Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Original Article

Laparoscopic or open surgery for the cancer of the middle and lower rectum short-term outcomes of a comparative non-randomised study

Authors: Nikolaos Gouvas, John Tsiaoussis, George Pechlivanides, Nikolaos Zervakis, Anastasios Tzortzinis, Costas Avgerinos, Christos Dervenis, Evaghelos Xynos

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The study compares the short-term results of the laparoscopic and open approach for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Consecutive cases with rectal cancer operated upon with laparoscopy from 2004 to 2007 were compared to open rectal cancer cases. Total mesorectal excision (TME) was attempted in all cases.

Patients and methods

Forty-two cases were included in the OPEN and 45 in the LAP group and were matched for age, gender, disease stage and operation type.

Surgical procedure

Duration of surgery was longer and blood transfusion requirements were less in the LAP group. Higher blood loss was observed in patients with neoadjuvant treatment in both groups. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment in the OPEN group had higher operation time, but that was not the case in the LAP group. There were three conversions (7%).

Results

Overall morbidity was higher in the OPEN group. LAP group patients were found to recover faster. R0 resection was achieved in 88% in the OPEN and 94% in the LAP group.

Discussion

Less morbidity and faster recovery is offered after laparoscopic TME. Quality of surgery assessed by histopathology is similar between the approaches. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation seems to have significant impact on blood loss but results in longer operation times of the OPEN group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference The COST Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef The COST Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe E et al (2005) Short-term end-points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC-CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe E et al (2005) Short-term end-points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC-CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) CoLon cancer laparoscopic or open resection study group (COLOR) Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) CoLon cancer laparoscopic or open resection study group (COLOR) Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:289–303CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:289–303CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe E et al (2007) Randomised trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3308PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe E et al (2007) Randomised trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3308PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Aziz O, Constandinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13(3):413–424PubMedCrossRef Aziz O, Constandinides V, Tekkis PP et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13(3):413–424PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Araujo SE, da Silva de Sousa AH Jr, de Campos FG et al (2003) Conventional approach versus abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paolo 58:133–140 Araujo SE, da Silva de Sousa AH Jr, de Campos FG et al (2003) Conventional approach versus abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paolo 58:133–140
10.
go back to reference Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89:1551–1556PubMedCrossRef Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89:1551–1556PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pechlivanides G, Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J et al (2007) Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach. Dig Dis 25:94–99PubMedCrossRef Pechlivanides G, Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J et al (2007) Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach. Dig Dis 25:94–99PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215PubMedCrossRef Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Marijen CAM, Kranenbarg K, van de Velde CJH, van Krieken JHJM (2002) Circumferential margin is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one mm but two mm is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, Marijen CAM, Kranenbarg K, van de Velde CJH, van Krieken JHJM (2002) Circumferential margin is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one mm but two mm is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Quirke P, Durdey R, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999PubMedCrossRef Quirke P, Durdey R, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedCrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G, Daniels IR (2004) Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is by dissection in front of Denonvilliers’ fascia. Br J Surg 91:121–123PubMedCrossRef Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G, Daniels IR (2004) Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is by dissection in front of Denonvilliers’ fascia. Br J Surg 91:121–123PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections of rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:7–13CrossRef Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM et al (2003) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections of rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 17:7–13CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morino M, PArinin U, Giraudo G et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237:335–342PubMedCrossRef Morino M, PArinin U, Giraudo G et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237:335–342PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRef Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L et al (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Law WL, Choi HK, Seto CL et al (2006) Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1–8CrossRef Law WL, Choi HK, Seto CL et al (2006) Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1–8CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F et al (2008) Results of anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases. Am J Surg 195:233–238PubMedCrossRef Pugliese R, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F et al (2008) Results of anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases. Am J Surg 195:233–238PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Marijnen CA, Kpiteijn E, van de Velde CJ et al (2002) Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 20:817–825PubMedCrossRef Marijnen CA, Kpiteijn E, van de Velde CJ et al (2002) Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 20:817–825PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jansson-Frykholm G, Glimelius B (2001) Combined chemo-radiotherapy vs radiotherapy in the treatment of primary non-resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 50:427–434CrossRef Jansson-Frykholm G, Glimelius B (2001) Combined chemo-radiotherapy vs radiotherapy in the treatment of primary non-resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 50:427–434CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2001) Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer a systemic overview of 8507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet 358:1291–1304CrossRef Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2001) Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer a systemic overview of 8507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet 358:1291–1304CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska A et al (2004) Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomized trial comparing short-term vs fractionated radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 72:15–24PubMedCrossRef Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska A et al (2004) Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomized trial comparing short-term vs fractionated radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 72:15–24PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L et al (2005) Enhanced tumouricidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Preliminary results of EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol 23:5620–5627PubMedCrossRef Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L et al (2005) Enhanced tumouricidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Preliminary results of EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol 23:5620–5627PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Folkesson J, Birgisson H, Palhman L et al (2005) Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapyon survival and local recurrence rate. Clin Oncol 23:5644–5650CrossRef Folkesson J, Birgisson H, Palhman L et al (2005) Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapyon survival and local recurrence rate. Clin Oncol 23:5644–5650CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Friso ML et al (2004) Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for better outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 47:798–807CrossRef Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Friso ML et al (2004) Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for better outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 47:798–807CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Heis MM, Tarabichi A, Delanoff C et al (1996) Perisurgical erythropoietin application in anemic patients with colorectal cancer: A double-blind randomized study. Surgery 119:523–527CrossRef Heis MM, Tarabichi A, Delanoff C et al (1996) Perisurgical erythropoietin application in anemic patients with colorectal cancer: A double-blind randomized study. Surgery 119:523–527CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bretagnol F, Rullier Couderc P et al (2003) Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch colorectal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5:451–453PubMedCrossRef Bretagnol F, Rullier Couderc P et al (2003) Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch colorectal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5:451–453PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lelong B, Bege T, Esterni B et al (2006) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:176–183CrossRef Lelong B, Bege T, Esterni B et al (2006) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:176–183CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE et al (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44:315–321PubMedCrossRef Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE et al (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44:315–321PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Rose J, Huegel O et al (2004) Results of the laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 cases. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):22–24CrossRef Scheidbach H, Rose J, Huegel O et al (2004) Results of the laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 cases. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):22–24CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Laurent C, Leblanc F, Gineste C, Saric J, Rullier E (2007) Laparoscopic approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:1555–1561PubMedCrossRef Laurent C, Leblanc F, Gineste C, Saric J, Rullier E (2007) Laparoscopic approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:1555–1561PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wu FP, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, van Leeuween PA, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (2003) Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46:147–155PubMedCrossRef Wu FP, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, van Leeuween PA, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (2003) Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46:147–155PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic or open surgery for the cancer of the middle and lower rectum short-term outcomes of a comparative non-randomised study
Authors
Nikolaos Gouvas
John Tsiaoussis
George Pechlivanides
Nikolaos Zervakis
Anastasios Tzortzinis
Costas Avgerinos
Christos Dervenis
Evaghelos Xynos
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0671-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2009 Go to the issue