Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Article

Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases

Authors: Feng Ye, Yanxia Feng, Jianjiang Lin

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Retrieving colorectal polyp after endoscopic snare polypectomy is time consuming and possibly incurs a failure. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the multiple-suction (M-S) technique for retrieving a variety of polyps.

Materials and methods

Four hundred and nine cases received endoscopic snare polypectomy from January 2003 to January 2007 were reviewed. The resected polyps were retrieved by M-S technique, in which suction regarded as the leading technique, was taken in combination with channel occlusion, trap, snare, and grasping forcep. Time of cecal intubation and of polypectomy, total examination time, shape, size, location, and number of polyp(s) were recorded. Retrieval time and polyp lost rate were also noted.

Results

A total of 602 polyps more than 3 mm in diameter underwent snare polypectomy. There were 96.7% (582/602) of polyps retrieved by the M-S technique. The mean retrieval time was 1.5 ± 0.6 min. Time of polypectomy, retrieval time, and total examination time were significantly positive correlative with the number of polyps (P < 0.05). In a univariate analysis, longer retrieval time was significantly associated with larger polyps, more distant polyps from the anus, and a greater number of polyps, while higher polyp lost rate was significantly associated with sessile polyp, smaller polyps, and a greater number of polyps. In a multivariate analysis, retrieval time level (≤2.0 or >2.0 min) was linked to the number of polyps.

Conclusions

The M-S technique is proved to be reliable when used in the majority cases of colorectal polyp retrieval. In retrieving too many polyps, the M-S technique is time consuming, and hence, additional methods should be applied to improve its retrieval effectiveness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stergiou N, Riphaus A, Lange P, Menke D, Kockerling F, Wehrmann T (2003) Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps: how far can we go. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:131–135PubMedCrossRef Stergiou N, Riphaus A, Lange P, Menke D, Kockerling F, Wehrmann T (2003) Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps: how far can we go. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:131–135PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, Blanchi S, Dumas R, Filiberti R (2004) EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 60:234–241PubMedCrossRef Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, Blanchi S, Dumas R, Filiberti R (2004) EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 60:234–241PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G, Lelong B, Moutardier V, Delpero JR, Giovannini M (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopy 38:231–235PubMedCrossRef Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G, Lelong B, Moutardier V, Delpero JR, Giovannini M (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopy 38:231–235PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Conio M, Ponchon T, Blanchi S, Filiberti R (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Am J Gastroenterol 101:653–663PubMedCrossRef Conio M, Ponchon T, Blanchi S, Filiberti R (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Am J Gastroenterol 101:653–663PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Waye JD, Lewis BS, Atchison MA, Talbott M (1988) The lost polyp: a guide to retrieval during colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:229–231PubMedCrossRef Waye JD, Lewis BS, Atchison MA, Talbott M (1988) The lost polyp: a guide to retrieval during colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:229–231PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wolff WI, Shinya H (1974) Modern endoscopy of the alimentary tract. Curr Probl Surg 11:1–62CrossRef Wolff WI, Shinya H (1974) Modern endoscopy of the alimentary tract. Curr Probl Surg 11:1–62CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Webb WA, McDaniel L, Jones L (1985) Experience with 1000 colonoscopic polypectomies. Ann Surg 201:626–632PubMedCrossRef Webb WA, McDaniel L, Jones L (1985) Experience with 1000 colonoscopic polypectomies. Ann Surg 201:626–632PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chey WD (2000) The channel occlusion technique: a novel method of retrieving polyps following snare resection. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1608–1609PubMedCrossRef Chey WD (2000) The channel occlusion technique: a novel method of retrieving polyps following snare resection. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1608–1609PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Miller K, Waye JD (2001) Polyp retrieval after colonoscopic polypectomy: use of the Roth retrieval net. Gastrointest Endosc 54:505–507PubMedCrossRef Miller K, Waye JD (2001) Polyp retrieval after colonoscopic polypectomy: use of the Roth retrieval net. Gastrointest Endosc 54:505–507PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Deenadayalu VP, Rex DK (2005) Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc 62:253–256PubMedCrossRef Deenadayalu VP, Rex DK (2005) Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc 62:253–256PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Massick DD, Khanduja KS (1999) Revised technique for retrieving small polyps from the colon and rectum after snare polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 42:543PubMedCrossRef Massick DD, Khanduja KS (1999) Revised technique for retrieving small polyps from the colon and rectum after snare polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 42:543PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Nishio A (2002) Retrieval of multiple colonic polyps remains to have problems. Am J Gastroenterol 97:3206–3207PubMedCrossRef Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Nishio A (2002) Retrieval of multiple colonic polyps remains to have problems. Am J Gastroenterol 97:3206–3207PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nakao NL (1996) Combined cautery and retrieval snares for gastrointestinal polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 44:602–605PubMedCrossRef Nakao NL (1996) Combined cautery and retrieval snares for gastrointestinal polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 44:602–605PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M (2001) Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Italian Multicentre Study Group Gut 48:812–815PubMedCrossRef Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M (2001) Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Italian Multicentre Study Group Gut 48:812–815PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Menges M, Fischinger J, Gartner B, Georg T, Woerdehoff D, Maier M, Harloff M, Stegmaier C, Raedle J, Zeitz M (2006) Screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is efficient: a controlled multicentre study. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:301–307PubMedCrossRef Menges M, Fischinger J, Gartner B, Georg T, Woerdehoff D, Maier M, Harloff M, Stegmaier C, Raedle J, Zeitz M (2006) Screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is efficient: a controlled multicentre study. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:301–307PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nelson DB, Bosco JJ, Curtis WD, Faigel DO, Kelsey PB, Leung JW, Mills MR, Smith P, Tarnasky PR, VanDam J, Wassef WY (1999) ASGE technology status evaluation report. Endoscopic retrieval devices. February. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 50:932–934PubMedCrossRef Nelson DB, Bosco JJ, Curtis WD, Faigel DO, Kelsey PB, Leung JW, Mills MR, Smith P, Tarnasky PR, VanDam J, Wassef WY (1999) ASGE technology status evaluation report. Endoscopic retrieval devices. February. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 50:932–934PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases
Authors
Feng Ye
Yanxia Feng
Jianjiang Lin
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0429-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2008 Go to the issue