Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2006

01-10-2006 | Original Article

Gastrointestinal cancer web sites: how do they address patients’ concerns?

Authors: Christian Weissenberger, David Müller, Jan Beranek-Chiu, Marcus Neumann, Sinje Jonassen, Susanne Bartelt, Stefan Schulz, Gerlo Witucki, Karl Henne, Michael Geissler, Joshua Fogel

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 7/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We studied the quality of web sites containing information on gastrointestinal cancer, focusing on the way these web sites dealt with the special concerns of these patients.

Materials and methods

Searching the Internet for German-language gastroenterological cancer web sites, we collected 9,947 web pages from 14 search engines. Evaluation was done with a 36-item questionnaire. Information quality, availability of the web sites, and web site attributes considering patients’ concerns and potential embarrassment were analyzed using a scoring system.

Results

Belonging to 165 web sites, 1,763 of 9,947 (17.7%) web pages found by search engines provided relevant information. Five hundred forty-seven (5.5%) hits were partly relevant, and 7,637 (76.8%) were irrelevant or not available. Most web sites reported about surgery (92.1%), chemotherapy (88.5%), and radiotherapy (73.9%). Of the web sites, 46.7% (n=77), 34.6% (n=57), and 21.8% (n=36) gave information about the author(s) itself, their qualifications, and references of their information, respectively. Search engines ranked web sites giving no information on evidence-based medicine higher than other web sites, whereas web sites providing this information accurately showed higher link popularities. Patients’ concerns and potential embarrassment were best addressed by gastrointestinal web sites initiated by private individuals or web sites directed to both a patient and physician audience.

Conclusions

With regard to gastrointestinal cancer web sites, many search engines may be ineffective, and patient emotional needs and concerns are often disregarded. Also, physicians should guide their patients through the Internet to find high-quality information and use link-popularity-based search strategies.
Literature
6.
7.
go back to reference Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis CR, Fallowfield L (1996) Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients’ views. BMJ 313:724–726PubMed Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis CR, Fallowfield L (1996) Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients’ views. BMJ 313:724–726PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L (2004) How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ 328:564PubMedCrossRef Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L (2004) How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ 328:564PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bader JL, Theofanos MF (2003) Searching for cancer information on the internet: analyzing natural language search queries. J Med Internet Res 5:e31PubMed Bader JL, Theofanos MF (2003) Searching for cancer information on the internet: analyzing natural language search queries. J Med Internet Res 5:e31PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Fogel J, Albert SM, Schnabel F, Ditkoff BA, Neugut AI (2002) Use of the internet by women with breast cancer. J Med Internet Res 4:e9PubMedCrossRef Fogel J, Albert SM, Schnabel F, Ditkoff BA, Neugut AI (2002) Use of the internet by women with breast cancer. J Med Internet Res 4:e9PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hainer MI, Tsai N, Komura ST, Chiu CL (2000) Fatal hepatorenal failure associated with hydrazine sulfate. Ann Intern Med 133:877–880PubMed Hainer MI, Tsai N, Komura ST, Chiu CL (2000) Fatal hepatorenal failure associated with hydrazine sulfate. Ann Intern Med 133:877–880PubMed
14.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL (1999) Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol 135:151–156PubMedCrossRef Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL (1999) Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol 135:151–156PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Roscoe JA, Bushunow P, Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Kuebler PJ, Jacobs A, Banerjee TK (2004) Patient expectation is a strong predictor of severe nausea after chemotherapy: a University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program study of patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 101:2701–2708PubMedCrossRef Roscoe JA, Bushunow P, Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Kuebler PJ, Jacobs A, Banerjee TK (2004) Patient expectation is a strong predictor of severe nausea after chemotherapy: a University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program study of patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 101:2701–2708PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gagliardi A, Jadad AR (2002) Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ 324:569–573PubMedCrossRef Gagliardi A, Jadad AR (2002) Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ 324:569–573PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weissenberger C, Schultze-Seemann W (2004) Letter to the editor: bladder cancer facts: accuracy of information on the Internet. J Urol 172(4 Pt 1):1544PubMed Weissenberger C, Schultze-Seemann W (2004) Letter to the editor: bladder cancer facts: accuracy of information on the Internet. J Urol 172(4 Pt 1):1544PubMed
18.
go back to reference Gaisser A, Stamatiadis-Smidt H (2004) Significance of information for cancer patients and the experience of the German Cancer Information Service in Heidelberg. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 47:957–968PubMedCrossRef Gaisser A, Stamatiadis-Smidt H (2004) Significance of information for cancer patients and the experience of the German Cancer Information Service in Heidelberg. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 47:957–968PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gilliam AD, Speake WJ, Scholefield JH, Beckingham IJ (2003) Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:44–46PubMedCrossRef Gilliam AD, Speake WJ, Scholefield JH, Beckingham IJ (2003) Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:44–46PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Weissenberger C, Jonassen S, Beranek-Chiu J, Neumann M, Muller D, Bartelt S, Schulz S, Monting JS, Henne K, Gitsch G, Witucki G (2004) Breast cancer: patient information needs reflected in English and German web sites. Br J Cancer 91:1482–1487PubMed Weissenberger C, Jonassen S, Beranek-Chiu J, Neumann M, Muller D, Bartelt S, Schulz S, Monting JS, Henne K, Gitsch G, Witucki G (2004) Breast cancer: patient information needs reflected in English and German web sites. Br J Cancer 91:1482–1487PubMed
21.
go back to reference Bichakjian CK, Schwartz JL, Wang TS, Hall JM, Johnson TM, Biermann JS (2002) Melanoma information on the Internet: often incomplete—a public health opportunity? J Clin Oncol 20:134–141PubMedCrossRef Bichakjian CK, Schwartz JL, Wang TS, Hall JM, Johnson TM, Biermann JS (2002) Melanoma information on the Internet: often incomplete—a public health opportunity? J Clin Oncol 20:134–141PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Weissenberger C (2004) The Internet as an information source—establishing methods for the evaluation of information quality [Das Internet als Informationsquelle—Etablierung methodischer Verfahren zur Qualitätsevaluation]. In: Bartsch HH (ed) Information in Oncology [Information in der Onkologie]. Karger, Basel Weissenberger C (2004) The Internet as an information source—establishing methods for the evaluation of information quality [Das Internet als Informationsquelle—Etablierung methodischer Verfahren zur Qualitätsevaluation]. In: Bartsch HH (ed) Information in Oncology [Information in der Onkologie]. Karger, Basel
23.
go back to reference Hinds C, Streater A, Mood D (1995) Functions and preferred methods of receiving information related to radiotherapy. Perceptions of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 18:374–384PubMedCrossRef Hinds C, Streater A, Mood D (1995) Functions and preferred methods of receiving information related to radiotherapy. Perceptions of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 18:374–384PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Simunovic M, Gafni A, Levine M (2004) Economics of preoperative radiotherapy with total mesorectal excision: what can we learn from the Dutch experience? J Clin Oncol 22:217–219PubMedCrossRef Simunovic M, Gafni A, Levine M (2004) Economics of preoperative radiotherapy with total mesorectal excision: what can we learn from the Dutch experience? J Clin Oncol 22:217–219PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Soualmia LF, Darmoni SJ, Le DF, Douyere M, Thelwall M (2002) Web impact factor: a bibliometric criterion applied to medical informatics societies’ web sites. Stud Health Technol Inform 90:178–183PubMed Soualmia LF, Darmoni SJ, Le DF, Douyere M, Thelwall M (2002) Web impact factor: a bibliometric criterion applied to medical informatics societies’ web sites. Stud Health Technol Inform 90:178–183PubMed
27.
go back to reference Al-Bahrani A, Plusa S (2004) The quality of patient-orientated Internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 6:323–326PubMedCrossRef Al-Bahrani A, Plusa S (2004) The quality of patient-orientated Internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 6:323–326PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2004) Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ 328:1470PubMedCrossRef Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2004) Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ 328:1470PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J, Cowen ME, Carpenter D, Vijan S (2003) The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 163:1601–1605PubMedCrossRef Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J, Cowen ME, Carpenter D, Vijan S (2003) The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 163:1601–1605PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bykowski JL, Alora MB, Dover JS, Arndt KA (2000) Accessibility and reliability of cutaneous laser surgery information on the World Wide Web. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:784–786PubMedCrossRef Bykowski JL, Alora MB, Dover JS, Arndt KA (2000) Accessibility and reliability of cutaneous laser surgery information on the World Wide Web. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:784–786PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Trumbo CW (2004) Cancer information on the World Wide Web: gross characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:332–333PubMedCrossRef Trumbo CW (2004) Cancer information on the World Wide Web: gross characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:332–333PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Jitaru E, Moisil I, Jitaru M-C (1999) Criteria for evaluating the quality of health related sites on Internet. MEDINF 2000—The 23rd national conference on medical informatics: telemedicine and telematics, Iasi, 2–4 November 2000 Jitaru E, Moisil I, Jitaru M-C (1999) Criteria for evaluating the quality of health related sites on Internet. MEDINF 2000—The 23rd national conference on medical informatics: telemedicine and telematics, Iasi, 2–4 November 2000
38.
go back to reference Rustgi AK (2001) Entangled in a Web(site)? Gastroenterology 120:1321PubMed Rustgi AK (2001) Entangled in a Web(site)? Gastroenterology 120:1321PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gastrointestinal cancer web sites: how do they address patients’ concerns?
Authors
Christian Weissenberger
David Müller
Jan Beranek-Chiu
Marcus Neumann
Sinje Jonassen
Susanne Bartelt
Stefan Schulz
Gerlo Witucki
Karl Henne
Michael Geissler
Joshua Fogel
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 7/2006
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0046-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2006

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2006 Go to the issue