Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

National trends in therapeutic approaches and outcomes for pediatric appendicitis: a Taiwanese nationwide cohort study

Authors: Chih-Cheng Luo, Wen-Kuei Chien, Chen-Sheng Huang, Hung-Chang Huang, Carlos Lam, Chin-Wang Hsu, Ray-Jade Chen, Kuang-Fu Cheng

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To define the pattern of therapeutic approaches for pediatric appendicitis and compare their benefits in Taiwan, we analyzed a research-oriented dataset released by the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan through the Collaboration Center for Health Information Application (CCHIA) to document the impact of the rise of laparoscopic treatment on outcomes.

Methods

We identified 22,161 patients under 18 years who had been hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis between 2007 and 2012 in the CCHIA. Statistical comparisons between the Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA, control) groups were computed using a Chi squared test. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95  % confidence intervals (CIs) of risk factors for intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and postoperative bowel obstruction (PBO) were derived from multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

In each respective year, the incidence of LA increased from 29.17  % in 2007 to 57.4 % in 2012, while that of OA decreased from 70.83 % in 2007 to 42.60 % in 2012; incidences of non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis with LA or OA seemed similar. The length of hospitalization between an LA and OA for non-perforated appendicitis was the same, but that with an LA was shorter for perforated appendicitis. The adjusted ORs for IAA and PBO for those patients with perforated and non-perforated appendicitis were 6.30 (95 % CI = 5.09–7.78; p < 0.001) and 6.49 (95 % CI = 4.45–9.48; p < 0.001); while for those cases undergoing an LA and OA, they were 0.50 (95 % CI = 0.40–0.62; p < 0.001) and 2.07 (95 % CI = 1.45–2.95; p < 0.001), respectively. The ORs of IAA and PBO for those patients ≤6 and 7–12 years of age were 1.67 (95 % CI = 1.23–2.25; p = 0.001) and 1.20 (95 % CI = 0.97–1.49; p = 0.095), and 1.88 (95 % CI = 1.08–3.24; p = 0.025) and 1.47 (95 % CI = 1.01–2.14; p = 0.043), respectively, compared to those aged 13–18 years.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that young age and perforated appendicitis can affect postoperative IAA and PBO. LA appeared beneficial in reducing the length of hospitalization and postoperative IAA, but had an increasing risk of PBO. Although laparoscopic approach for pediatric appendectomy is increasing in our country, the different hospital levels and pediatric surgeon’s laparoscopic experience must be evaluated in further study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Varlet F, Tardieu D, Limonne B et al (1994) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children-comparative study of 403 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg 43:333–337CrossRef Varlet F, Tardieu D, Limonne B et al (1994) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children-comparative study of 403 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg 43:333–337CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee SL, Yaghoubian A, Kaji A (2011) Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on age, sex, and perforation status. Arch Surg 146:1118–1121PubMedCrossRef Lee SL, Yaghoubian A, Kaji A (2011) Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on age, sex, and perforation status. Arch Surg 146:1118–1121PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Saba N, Saha D, Rahman M et al (2010) Comparison of postoperative morbidity between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. Mymensingh Med J 19:348–352 Saba N, Saha D, Rahman M et al (2010) Comparison of postoperative morbidity between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. Mymensingh Med J 19:348–352
4.
go back to reference Billingham MJ, Basterfield SJ (2010) Pediatric surgical technique: laparoscopic or open approach? A systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:348–352 Billingham MJ, Basterfield SJ (2010) Pediatric surgical technique: laparoscopic or open approach? A systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:348–352
5.
go back to reference Taqi E, Al Hadher S, Ryekman J et al (2008) Outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 43:73–77CrossRef Taqi E, Al Hadher S, Ryekman J et al (2008) Outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 43:73–77CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee C, Lin Y (2003) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in children: another opinion. Int Surg 88:92–94PubMed Lee C, Lin Y (2003) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in children: another opinion. Int Surg 88:92–94PubMed
7.
go back to reference Shalak F, Almulhim S, Ghantous S et al (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy: burden or benefit? A single-center experience. J Laparoendos Adv Surg Tech A 19:427–429CrossRef Shalak F, Almulhim S, Ghantous S et al (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy: burden or benefit? A single-center experience. J Laparoendos Adv Surg Tech A 19:427–429CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hermans B, Otte J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: pros & cons-literature review of 4190cases. Acta Chir Belg 97:110–117PubMed Hermans B, Otte J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: pros & cons-literature review of 4190cases. Acta Chir Belg 97:110–117PubMed
9.
go back to reference Serour F, Witzling M, Gorenstien A (2005) Is laparoscopic appendectomy in children associated with an uncommon postoperative complication? Surg Endosc 19:919–922PubMedCrossRef Serour F, Witzling M, Gorenstien A (2005) Is laparoscopic appendectomy in children associated with an uncommon postoperative complication? Surg Endosc 19:919–922PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Herman J, Duda M, Loveck M et al (2003) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1419–1421PubMed Herman J, Duda M, Loveck M et al (2003) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1419–1421PubMed
12.
go back to reference Esposito C, Borzi P, Valla JS et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases. World J Surg 31:750–755PubMedCrossRef Esposito C, Borzi P, Valla JS et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases. World J Surg 31:750–755PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yong JL, Law WL, Lo CY et al (2006) A comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. JSLS 10:188–192PubMedCentralPubMed Yong JL, Law WL, Lo CY et al (2006) A comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. JSLS 10:188–192PubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lin HF, Wu JM, Tseng LM et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointes Surg 10:906–910CrossRef Lin HF, Wu JM, Tseng LM et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointes Surg 10:906–910CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Acheson J, Banerjee J (2010) Management of suspected appendicitis in children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 95:9–13PubMedCrossRef Acheson J, Banerjee J (2010) Management of suspected appendicitis in children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 95:9–13PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrate database. Ann Surg 239:43–52PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrate database. Ann Surg 239:43–52PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nataraja RM, Teaque WJ, Galea J et al (2012) Comparison of intraabdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendectomies in children. J Pediatr Surg 47:317–321PubMedCrossRef Nataraja RM, Teaque WJ, Galea J et al (2012) Comparison of intraabdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendectomies in children. J Pediatr Surg 47:317–321PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Taso KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA et al (2007) Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children. Comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg 42:939–942CrossRef Taso KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA et al (2007) Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children. Comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg 42:939–942CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nataraja RM, Teaque WJ, Galea J et al (2012) Comparison of intraabdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendectomies in children. J Pediatr Surg 47:317–321PubMedCrossRef Nataraja RM, Teaque WJ, Galea J et al (2012) Comparison of intraabdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendectomies in children. J Pediatr Surg 47:317–321PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K et al (2002) Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:1317–1320PubMedCrossRef Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K et al (2002) Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:1317–1320PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Paterson HM, Qadan M, de Luca SM et al (2008) Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 95:363–368PubMedCrossRef Paterson HM, Qadan M, de Luca SM et al (2008) Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 95:363–368PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schmelzer TM, Rana AR, Walters KC et al (2007) Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg tech A 17:693–697PubMedCrossRef Schmelzer TM, Rana AR, Walters KC et al (2007) Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg tech A 17:693–697PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K et al (2002) Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:1317–1320PubMedCrossRef Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K et al (2002) Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 37:1317–1320PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kaselas C, Molinaro F, Lacreuse I et al (2009) Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 44:1581–1585PubMedCrossRef Kaselas C, Molinaro F, Lacreuse I et al (2009) Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 44:1581–1585PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ponsky TA, Huang ZJ, Kittle K et al (2004) Hospital- and patient-level level characteristics and the risk of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children. JAMA 292:1977–1982PubMedCrossRef Ponsky TA, Huang ZJ, Kittle K et al (2004) Hospital- and patient-level level characteristics and the risk of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children. JAMA 292:1977–1982PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Chau Z et al (2014) Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB 16:899–906PubMedCrossRef Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Chau Z et al (2014) Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits? HPB 16:899–906PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
National trends in therapeutic approaches and outcomes for pediatric appendicitis: a Taiwanese nationwide cohort study
Authors
Chih-Cheng Luo
Wen-Kuei Chien
Chen-Sheng Huang
Hung-Chang Huang
Carlos Lam
Chin-Wang Hsu
Ray-Jade Chen
Kuang-Fu Cheng
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3718-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

Pediatric Surgery International 7/2015 Go to the issue