Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Article

Rectopexy for paediatric rectal prolapse: good outcomes but not without postoperative problems

Authors: Antti I. Koivusalo, Mikko P. Pakarinen, Risto J. Rintala

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Rectopexy is a simple treatment of persisting complete rectal prolapse (RP) or related functional disorders in children. The results of rectopexy have been encouraging with few complications. We describe the postoperative complications and outcome of rectopexy in our institution from 2002 to 2013.

Methods

Ethical committee accepted the study. Hospital records of 27 successive patients (16 males), median age 7.2 (range 2.8–17) years, who underwent rectopexy (25 laparoscopic, 2 open) were reviewed. Indication for rectopexy included RP (n = 24), solitary rectal ulcer with enterocele (n = 2) and rectocele (n = 1). Nine patients (39 %) were healthy. In the remaining 14 patients, RP was secondary to anorectal malformation (n = 2), bladder exstrophy (n = 1), sacrococcygeal teratoma (n = 1) and myelomeningocele (n = 1) or associated with mental retardation (n = 8) and Asperger’s syndrome (n = 1). Five (18 %) patients had constipation. Unexpected postoperative events and complications were rated by Clavien–Dindo classification (Grades I–V).

Results

Seventeen (61 %) patients had postoperative complications (Grade I n = 5, II n = 2 and III n = 7). Readmission was required in 11 (41 %) and reoperation, endoscopy or other surgical procedure in 9 (33 %) patients. Complications included severe faecal obstruction (n = 2), constipation (n = 3), faecal soiling (n = 1) urinary retention (n = 2), enuresis (n = 1), infection (n = 2), residual mucosal prolapse (n = 5), discomfort at defecation (n = 1) and recurrent RP (n = 2). Reoperations included sigmoid resection with re-rectopexy (n = 1), resection of mucosal prolapse (n = 1), suprapubic urinary catheter (n = 2), evacuation of faecal impaction (n = 2), colonoscopy (n = 3), appendicostomy for antegrade continence enema (n = 1). Mental retardation or behavioural disorder increased the risk of postoperative faecal obstruction and constipation RR = 84 (95 % CI 4.3–1600), p = 0.0035. After median follow-up of 4.1 (range 0.6–11) years RP or related condition was cured in 26 patients. Constipation and faecal soiling require management in a total of seven patients.

Conclusions

Long-term results of rectopexy were good. Postoperative complications from mild to moderate grade were unexpectedly frequent. Preoperative neurobehavioural disorder and constipation increase the risk of postoperative problems and should be mentioned in patient counselling.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Potter DD, Bruny JL, Allshouse MJ et al (2010) Laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness anorectal prolapse in children: an effective outpatient procedure. J Pediatr Surg 45(10):2103–2107PubMedCrossRef Potter DD, Bruny JL, Allshouse MJ et al (2010) Laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness anorectal prolapse in children: an effective outpatient procedure. J Pediatr Surg 45(10):2103–2107PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vijay V, Halbert J, Zissimopoulos A et al (2008) Day case laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, safe, and cost effective for selected patients. Surg Endosc 22(5):1237–1240PubMedCrossRef Vijay V, Halbert J, Zissimopoulos A et al (2008) Day case laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, safe, and cost effective for selected patients. Surg Endosc 22(5):1237–1240PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Formijne Jonkers HA, Maya A, Draaisma WA et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol Feb 6. [Epub ahead of print] Formijne Jonkers HA, Maya A, Draaisma WA et al (2014) Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol Feb 6. [Epub ahead of print]
4.
go back to reference Koivusalo A, Pakarinen M, Rintala R (2006) Laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of persisting rectal prolapse in children: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc 20(6):960–963PubMedCrossRef Koivusalo A, Pakarinen M, Rintala R (2006) Laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of persisting rectal prolapse in children: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc 20(6):960–963PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ismail M, Gabr K, Shalaby R et al (2010) Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children. J Pediatr Surg 45(3):533–539 Ismail M, Gabr K, Shalaby R et al (2010) Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children. J Pediatr Surg 45(3):533–539
6.
go back to reference Laituri CA, Garey CL, Fraser JD et al (2010) 15-Year experience in the treatment of rectal in children. J Pediatr Surg 45(8):1607–1609PubMedCrossRef Laituri CA, Garey CL, Fraser JD et al (2010) 15-Year experience in the treatment of rectal in children. J Pediatr Surg 45(8):1607–1609PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA et al (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA et al (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koivusalo AI, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RI et al (2012) Dynamic defecography in the diagnosis of paediatric rectal prolapse and related disorders. Pediatr Surg Int 28(8):815–820PubMedCrossRef Koivusalo AI, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RI et al (2012) Dynamic defecography in the diagnosis of paediatric rectal prolapse and related disorders. Pediatr Surg Int 28(8):815–820PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wallner C, Lange MM, Bonsing BA et al. (2008) Causes of faecal and urinary incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on cadaveric surgery: a study from the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial. J Clin Oncol 26(27):4466–4472 Wallner C, Lange MM, Bonsing BA et al. (2008) Causes of faecal and urinary incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on cadaveric surgery: a study from the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial. J Clin Oncol 26(27):4466–4472
10.
go back to reference Steele SR, Goetz LH, Minami SETAL (2006) Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 49(4):440–445PubMedCrossRef Steele SR, Goetz LH, Minami SETAL (2006) Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 49(4):440–445PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rectopexy for paediatric rectal prolapse: good outcomes but not without postoperative problems
Authors
Antti I. Koivusalo
Mikko P. Pakarinen
Risto J. Rintala
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3534-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Pediatric Surgery International 8/2014 Go to the issue