Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 8/2009

01-08-2009 | Original Article

Duodenal atresia: associated anomalies, prenatal diagnosis and outcome

Authors: M. S. Choudhry, N. Rahman, P. Boyd, K. Lakhoo

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of duodenal atresia is commonly made prenatally, either as an isolated lesion or due to its association with other chromosomal abnormalities (Robertson et al. in Semin Perinatol 18:182–195, 1994; Hemming and Rankin in J Prenat Diagn 27:1205–1211, 2007). The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of associated anomalies, prenatal diagnostic accuracy and survival of cases of congenital duodenal atresia in our institution.

Methods

All cases of duodenal atresia registered with our local congenital anomaly register over a 10-year period, 1995–2004 inclusive, were studied, including those resulting in termination of pregnancies, stillbirths, intrauterine deaths and neonatal deaths. To ensure high-case ascertainment, data were cross checked with prenatal ultrasound, cytogenetic laboratory, pathology department and neonatal surgical data base. Data were analysed for associated anomalies, accuracy of prenatal diagnosis and neonatal outcomes.

Results

A total of 65 patients were initially diagnosed as having duodenal atresia, of these 4 were subsequently excluded (1 postnatal normal bowel and 3 high jejunal atresias). In the remaining 61 cases, 35 (57%) had an association with other congenital abnormalities and 26 (43%) were isolated anomalies. Thirty-five were male and 26 female (M:F = 1.4:1). Twenty-one out of 29 (72%) patients prenatally diagnosed, compared with 14 out of 32 (44%) patients diagnosed postnatally had associated anomalies. Duodenal atresia was suspected on routine prenatal ultrasonography at 20-week gestation in 33 cases and confirmed in 29 (48%) cases with 4 false-positive diagnoses (1 normal bowel and 3 high jejunal atresias). No prenatal diagnosis was made in 32 (52%) babies. Of the 61 cases, 53 were live births with 2 early neonatal deaths (1 cardiac and 1 VACTERL), 5 terminations, 2 intrauterine deaths and 1 stillbirth (Fig. 3). Overall neonatal survival was 96% (51 cases). Mortality in the group diagnosed prenatally was 34 % (10 cases).

Conclusion

This study shows an overall increased association of duodenal atresia with Down’s syndrome. In the group diagnosed prenatally, mortality as well as the association with other congenital anomalies was found to be higher. We have demonstrated a greater prenatal diagnostic accuracy, but confirm postnatal outcomes similar to previous studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robertson FM, Crombleholme TM, Paidas M et al (1994) Prenatal diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal anomalies. Semin Perinatol 18:182–195PubMed Robertson FM, Crombleholme TM, Paidas M et al (1994) Prenatal diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal anomalies. Semin Perinatol 18:182–195PubMed
2.
go back to reference Hemming V, Rankin J (2007) Small intestinal atresia in a defined population: occurrence, prenatal diagnosis and survival. Prenat Diagn 27:1205–1211PubMedCrossRef Hemming V, Rankin J (2007) Small intestinal atresia in a defined population: occurrence, prenatal diagnosis and survival. Prenat Diagn 27:1205–1211PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fonkalsrud EW, de Lorimer AA, Hays DM (1969) Congenital atresia and stenosis of the duodenum: a review compiled from the members of the surgical section. Am Acad Pediatr 43:79–83 Fonkalsrud EW, de Lorimer AA, Hays DM (1969) Congenital atresia and stenosis of the duodenum: a review compiled from the members of the surgical section. Am Acad Pediatr 43:79–83
4.
go back to reference O’Rahilly R, Muller F (1996) Human embryology and teratology. Wiley-Liss, New York, p 229 O’Rahilly R, Muller F (1996) Human embryology and teratology. Wiley-Liss, New York, p 229
5.
go back to reference Zimmer EZ, Bronshtein M (1996) Early diagnosis of duodenal atresia and possible sonographic pitfalls. Prenat Diagn 16:564–566PubMedCrossRef Zimmer EZ, Bronshtein M (1996) Early diagnosis of duodenal atresia and possible sonographic pitfalls. Prenat Diagn 16:564–566PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Phelps S, Fisher R, Partington A, Dykes E (1997) Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of gastrointestinal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 32:438–440PubMedCrossRef Phelps S, Fisher R, Partington A, Dykes E (1997) Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of gastrointestinal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 32:438–440PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Malone FD, Crombleholme TM, Nores JA, D’Alton ME (1997) Pitfalls of the ‘double bubble’ sign: a case of congenital duodenal duplication. Fetal Diag Ther 12:298–300CrossRef Malone FD, Crombleholme TM, Nores JA, D’Alton ME (1997) Pitfalls of the ‘double bubble’ sign: a case of congenital duodenal duplication. Fetal Diag Ther 12:298–300CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dewbury KC, Aluwihare APR, Birch SJ (1980) Prenatal ultrasound demonstration of a choledochal cyst. Br J Radiol 53:906PubMedCrossRef Dewbury KC, Aluwihare APR, Birch SJ (1980) Prenatal ultrasound demonstration of a choledochal cyst. Br J Radiol 53:906PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lawrence MJ, Ford WDA, Furness ME, Hayward T, Wilson T (2000) Congenital duodenal obstruction: early antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int 16:342–345PubMedCrossRef Lawrence MJ, Ford WDA, Furness ME, Hayward T, Wilson T (2000) Congenital duodenal obstruction: early antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int 16:342–345PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hertzberg BS (1994) Sonography of the fetal gastrointestinal tract: anatomic variants, diagnostic pitfalls and abnormalities. AJR 162:1175–1182PubMed Hertzberg BS (1994) Sonography of the fetal gastrointestinal tract: anatomic variants, diagnostic pitfalls and abnormalities. AJR 162:1175–1182PubMed
Metadata
Title
Duodenal atresia: associated anomalies, prenatal diagnosis and outcome
Authors
M. S. Choudhry
N. Rahman
P. Boyd
K. Lakhoo
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2406-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

Pediatric Surgery International 8/2009 Go to the issue