Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 4/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Article

Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children

Authors: Rajendra B. Nerli, Mallikarjun Reddy, Vikram Prabha, Ashish Koura, Praveen Patne, M. K. Ganesh

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children has been proven to be safe and effective, with comparable results to open surgery. Due to the extension of laparoscopic indications from ablative to reconstructive procedures requiring endoscopic suturing, most centres have plateaued within their learning curve. Based on our own experience with a little more than 100 cases, we focus on the complications and the definitive learning curve of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Materials and methods

A total of 103 laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed during the period January 2002 to June 2008. Of these, 102 underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and one underwent laparoscopic vascular hitch for crossing lower pole vessels. Intraoperative incidents/complications were analysed using the Satava classification, and the postoperative complications according to the Clavien classification.

Results

Intraoperative incidents occurred in 2.91% of the cases, mostly without consequences for the child including faulty port placement needing placement of an extra port and umbilical port side bleed. Postoperative complications occurred in 11.65% children and included prolonged ileus, prolonged urinary leak, fever, haematuria and recurrent ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stenosis. Recurrent UPJ stenosis occurred in 4.85% of children needing reoperation.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children is not only feasible, but safe and effective. Intraoperative incidents occur in up to 3% of the cases, and complications in 12.9–15.8%. Increased experience, training and knowledge regarding the incidence and management of complications will be able to further reduce these in the future.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nguyen DH, Alibadi H, Ercole CJ, Gonzalez R (1989) Nonintubated Anderson-Hynes repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients. J Urol 142:704–706PubMed Nguyen DH, Alibadi H, Ercole CJ, Gonzalez R (1989) Nonintubated Anderson-Hynes repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients. J Urol 142:704–706PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kavoussi LR, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150:1891PubMed Kavoussi LR, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150:1891PubMed
11.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–522PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–522PubMed
14.
go back to reference Lam PN, Wong C, Mulholland TL, Campbell JB, Kropp BP (2007) Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4 year experience. J Endourol 21:1467–1471PubMedCrossRef Lam PN, Wong C, Mulholland TL, Campbell JB, Kropp BP (2007) Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4 year experience. J Endourol 21:1467–1471PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T (2008) Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 26(6):539–547PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T (2008) Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 26(6):539–547PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sugiono M, Teber D, Anghel G, Gozen AS, Stock C, Hruza M, Frede T, Klein J, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Assessing the predictive validity and efficacy of a multimodal training programme for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51:1332–1340. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.029 PubMedCrossRef Sugiono M, Teber D, Anghel G, Gozen AS, Stock C, Hruza M, Frede T, Klein J, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Assessing the predictive validity and efficacy of a multimodal training programme for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51:1332–1340. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2006.​11.​029 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Frede T, Stock C, Renner C, Budair Z, Abdel-Salem Y, Rassweiler JJ (1999) Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques. J Endourol 13:191–198PubMedCrossRef Frede T, Stock C, Renner C, Budair Z, Abdel-Salem Y, Rassweiler JJ (1999) Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques. J Endourol 13:191–198PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Olsen H, Jorgensen T (2003) Robotic versus standard retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty in children. BJU Int 91(s1):74 Olsen H, Jorgensen T (2003) Robotic versus standard retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty in children. BJU Int 91(s1):74
Metadata
Title
Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children
Authors
Rajendra B. Nerli
Mallikarjun Reddy
Vikram Prabha
Ashish Koura
Praveen Patne
M. K. Ganesh
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2341-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Pediatric Surgery International 4/2009 Go to the issue