Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 7/2004

01-07-2004 | Original Article

MACE or caecostomy button for idiopathic constipation in children: a comparison of complications and outcomes

Authors: S. Cascio, M. E. Flett, M. De la Hunt, A. M. Barrett, B. Jaffray

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 7/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The Malone antegrade enema (MACE) and the caecostomy button (CB) are two methods of achieving colonic lavage in constipated children with faecal soiling. We reviewed our experience with the MACE and CB, aiming to compare results, complications, and outcomes. Between June 1998 and August 2002, 37 children (15 boys) underwent MACE and 12 children (9 boys) underwent CB for idiopathic constipation that had failed conventional treatment. Rectal biopsy was ganglionic in all cases. Mean age at surgery was 9.9 years for the MACE patients and 9.8 years for the CB patients. All children are under continuous review, and mean follow-up is 18 months. Statistical analysis of proportions used Fisher’s exact test. Soiling stopped completely in 30 children with MACE and in 9 with CB. Occasional soiling is still present in two children with a CB and in one with MACE. One child with a CB had resumed regular bowel activity, and the CB was removed. MACE failed in 5 (14%) patients because of ineffective colonic lavage, and in one patient (3%) the appendix was replaced by a CB because of perforation of the appendicostomy. CB failed in one patient (8%) because of faecal leak around the button; the child was subsequently converted to MACE (P=>0.5). Complications requiring operative intervention were seen in 9 (24%) of the 37 patients who underwent MACE and none of the 12 patients who underwent CB (P=0.09). The main complication requiring surgical intervention was stoma stenosis (11%). Complications not requiring operative intervention were seen in 7 (19%) patients after MACE and 11 (92%) of the 12 patients who underwent CB (P<0.001). The MACE and CB procedures are reliable and effective with high success rates. The MACE has a higher incidence of complications requiring operative intervention. Conversely, complications not requiring operative intervention are more frequent with CB. CB is a safe and effective alternative to MACE in children with faecal soiling.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malone PSJ, Ransley PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1218PubMed Malone PSJ, Ransley PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1218PubMed
2.
go back to reference Squire R, Kiely EM, Carr B, Ransley PG, Duffy PG (1993) The clinical application of the Malone antegrade continence enema. J Paediatr Surg 28:1012–1015 Squire R, Kiely EM, Carr B, Ransley PG, Duffy PG (1993) The clinical application of the Malone antegrade continence enema. J Paediatr Surg 28:1012–1015
3.
go back to reference Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PSJ (1998) How to achieve a successful Malone antegrade continence enema. J Paediatr Surg 33:138–141 Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PSJ (1998) How to achieve a successful Malone antegrade continence enema. J Paediatr Surg 33:138–141
4.
go back to reference Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PSJ (1999) The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J Paediatr Surg 34:338–340 Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PSJ (1999) The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J Paediatr Surg 34:338–340
5.
go back to reference Marshall J, Hutson JM, Anticich N, Stanton MP (2001) Antegrade continence enema in the treatment of slow transit constipation. J Paediatr Surg 36:1227–1230CrossRef Marshall J, Hutson JM, Anticich N, Stanton MP (2001) Antegrade continence enema in the treatment of slow transit constipation. J Paediatr Surg 36:1227–1230CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilcox DT, Kiely EM (1998) The Malone (antegrade continence enema) procedure: early experience. J Paediatr Surg 33:204–206 Wilcox DT, Kiely EM (1998) The Malone (antegrade continence enema) procedure: early experience. J Paediatr Surg 33:204–206
7.
go back to reference Shandling B, Chait PG, Richards HF (1996) Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of faecal incontinence. J Paediatr Surg 31:534–537 Shandling B, Chait PG, Richards HF (1996) Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of faecal incontinence. J Paediatr Surg 31:534–537
8.
go back to reference Chait PG, Shandling B, Richards HF (1997) The cecostomy button. J Paediatr Surg 32:849–851 Chait PG, Shandling B, Richards HF (1997) The cecostomy button. J Paediatr Surg 32:849–851
9.
go back to reference Fukunaga K, Kimura K, Lawrence JP, Soper RT, Phearman LA (1996) Button device for antegrade enema in the treatment of incontinence and constipation. J Paediatr Surg 31:1038–1039CrossRef Fukunaga K, Kimura K, Lawrence JP, Soper RT, Phearman LA (1996) Button device for antegrade enema in the treatment of incontinence and constipation. J Paediatr Surg 31:1038–1039CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ellsworth P., Webb HW, Crump JM, Barraza MA, Stevens PS, Mesrobian HGJ (1996) The Malone antegrade colonic enema enhances the quality of life in children undergoing urological incontinence procedure. J Urol 155:1416PubMed Ellsworth P., Webb HW, Crump JM, Barraza MA, Stevens PS, Mesrobian HGJ (1996) The Malone antegrade colonic enema enhances the quality of life in children undergoing urological incontinence procedure. J Urol 155:1416PubMed
11.
go back to reference Graf JL, Strear C, Bratton B, Housley TH, Jennings RW (1998) The antegrade continence enema procedure: a review of the literature. J Paediatr Surg 33:1294–1296 Graf JL, Strear C, Bratton B, Housley TH, Jennings RW (1998) The antegrade continence enema procedure: a review of the literature. J Paediatr Surg 33:1294–1296
12.
go back to reference Loening-Baucke V (1993) Constipation in early childhood: patient characteristics, treatment and long term follow up. Gut 34:1400–1404PubMed Loening-Baucke V (1993) Constipation in early childhood: patient characteristics, treatment and long term follow up. Gut 34:1400–1404PubMed
13.
go back to reference Loening-Baucke V (2000) Clinical approach to faecal soiling in children. Clin Paediatr 39:603–607 Loening-Baucke V (2000) Clinical approach to faecal soiling in children. Clin Paediatr 39:603–607
15.
go back to reference Griffiths DM (2002) The physiology of continence: idiopathic fecal constipation and soiling. Semin Ped Surg 11:67–74CrossRef Griffiths DM (2002) The physiology of continence: idiopathic fecal constipation and soiling. Semin Ped Surg 11:67–74CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Webb H, Barrazza M, Crump J (1997) Laparoscopic appendicostomy for management of faecal incontinence. J Paediatr Surg 32:457–458 Webb H, Barrazza M, Crump J (1997) Laparoscopic appendicostomy for management of faecal incontinence. J Paediatr Surg 32:457–458
17.
go back to reference Van Savage JG, Yohannes P (2000) Laparoscopic antegrade continent enema in situ appendix procedure for refractory constipation and overflow fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida. J Urol 164:1084–1087PubMed Van Savage JG, Yohannes P (2000) Laparoscopic antegrade continent enema in situ appendix procedure for refractory constipation and overflow fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida. J Urol 164:1084–1087PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lynch AC, Beasley SW, Robertson RW, Morreau PN (1999) Comparison of results of laparoscopic and open antegrade continence enema procedures. Pediatr Surg Int 15:343–346CrossRefPubMed Lynch AC, Beasley SW, Robertson RW, Morreau PN (1999) Comparison of results of laparoscopic and open antegrade continence enema procedures. Pediatr Surg Int 15:343–346CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stanton MP, Shin YM, Hutson JM (2002) Laparoscopic placement of the Chait cecostomy device via appendicostomy. J Paediatr Surg 37:1766–1767CrossRef Stanton MP, Shin YM, Hutson JM (2002) Laparoscopic placement of the Chait cecostomy device via appendicostomy. J Paediatr Surg 37:1766–1767CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Clark T, Pope JC, Adams MC, Wells N, Brock JW (2002) Factors that influence outcomes of the Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstructive procedure in children. J Urol 168:1537–1540CrossRefPubMed Clark T, Pope JC, Adams MC, Wells N, Brock JW (2002) Factors that influence outcomes of the Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstructive procedure in children. J Urol 168:1537–1540CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MACE or caecostomy button for idiopathic constipation in children: a comparison of complications and outcomes
Authors
S. Cascio
M. E. Flett
M. De la Hunt
A. M. Barrett
B. Jaffray
Publication date
01-07-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 7/2004
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1220-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2004

Pediatric Surgery International 7/2004 Go to the issue