Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Child's Nervous System 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Focus Session

Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients—a systematic review

Authors: Vita M. Klieverik, Kai J. Miller, Ash Singhal, Kuo Sen Han, Peter A Woerdeman

Published in: Child's Nervous System | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Complications following cranioplasty with either autografts or cranial implants are commonly reported in pediatric patients. However, data regarding cranioplasty strategies, complications and long-term outcomes are not well described. This study systematically reviews the literature for an overview of current cranioplasty practice in children.

Methods

A systematic review of articles published from inception to July 2018 was performed. Studies were included if they reported the specific use of cranioplasty materials following craniectomy in patients younger than 18 years of age, and had a minimum follow-up of at least 1 year.

Results

Twenty-four manuscripts, describing a total of 864 cranioplasty procedures, met the inclusion criteria. The age of patients in this aggregate ranged from 1 month to 20 years and the weighted average was 8.0 years. The follow-up ranged from 0.4 months to 18 years and had a weighted average of 40.4 months. Autologous bone grafts were used in 484 cases (56.0%). Resorption, infection and/or hydrocephalus were the most frequently mentioned complications. In this aggregate group, 61 patients needed a revision cranioplasty. However, in 6/13 (46%) papers studying autologous cranioplasties, no data was provided on resorption, infection and revision cranioplasty rates. Cranial implants were used in 380 cases (44.0%), with custom-made porous hydroxyapatite being the most commonly used material (100/380, 26.3%). Infection and migration/fracturing/loosening were the most frequently documented complications. Eleven revision cranioplasties were reported. Again, no data was reported on infection and revision cranioplasty rates, in 7/16 (44%) and 9/16 (56%) of papers, respectively.

Conclusion

Our systematic review illuminates that whether autografts or cranial implants are used, postcranioplasty complications are quite common. Beyond this, the existing literature does not contain well documented and comparable outcome parameters, suggesting that prospective, long-term multicenter cohort studies are needed to be able to optimize cranioplasty strategies in children who will undergo cranioplasty following craniectomy.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Artico M, Ferrante L, Pastore FS, Ramundo EO, Cantarelli D, Scopelliti D (2003) Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 60:71–79CrossRefPubMed Artico M, Ferrante L, Pastore FS, Ramundo EO, Cantarelli D, Scopelliti D (2003) Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 60:71–79CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cohen AJ, Dickerman RD, Schneider SJ (2004) New method of pediatric cranioplasty for skull defect utilizing polyactic acid absorbable plates and carbonated apatite bone cement. J Craniofac Surg 15:469–472CrossRefPubMed Cohen AJ, Dickerman RD, Schneider SJ (2004) New method of pediatric cranioplasty for skull defect utilizing polyactic acid absorbable plates and carbonated apatite bone cement. J Craniofac Surg 15:469–472CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ducic Y (2002) Titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty: a report of 20 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:272–276CrossRefPubMed Ducic Y (2002) Titanium mesh and hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty: a report of 20 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:272–276CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Edwards MSB, Ousterhout DK (1987) Autogeneic skull bone grafts to reconstruct large or complex skull defects in children and adolescents. Neurosurgery 20:273–280CrossRefPubMed Edwards MSB, Ousterhout DK (1987) Autogeneic skull bone grafts to reconstruct large or complex skull defects in children and adolescents. Neurosurgery 20:273–280CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Eppley BL, Hollier L, Stal S (2003) Hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: II. Clinical experience with a new quick-setting material. J Craniofac Surg 14:209–214CrossRefPubMed Eppley BL, Hollier L, Stal S (2003) Hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: II. Clinical experience with a new quick-setting material. J Craniofac Surg 14:209–214CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB (1984) Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:933–938CrossRef Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB (1984) Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:933–938CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V (2003) Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critital review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 14:144–153CrossRefPubMed Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V (2003) Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critital review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 14:144–153CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Ozerdem OR, Sen O, Anlatici R, Erdoğan B, Aydin V (2002) Osteogaleal flaps in pediatric cranioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:127–132CrossRefPubMed Ozerdem OR, Sen O, Anlatici R, Erdoğan B, Aydin V (2002) Osteogaleal flaps in pediatric cranioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:127–132CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Posnick JC, Goldstein JA, Armstrong D, Rutka JT (1993) Reconstruction of skull defects in children and adolescents by the use of fixed cranial bone grafts: long-term results. Neurosurgery 32:785-791CrossRef Posnick JC, Goldstein JA, Armstrong D, Rutka JT (1993) Reconstruction of skull defects in children and adolescents by the use of fixed cranial bone grafts: long-term results. Neurosurgery 32:785-791CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Rocque BG, Agee BS, Thompson EM, Piedra M, Baird LC, Selden NR, Greene S, Deibert CP, Hankinson TC, Lew SM, Iskandar BJ, Bragg TM, Frim D, Grant G, Gupta N, Auguste KI, Nikas DC, Vassilyadi M, Muh CR, Wetjen NM, Lam SK (2018) Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.3.PEDS17234 CrossRef Rocque BG, Agee BS, Thompson EM, Piedra M, Baird LC, Selden NR, Greene S, Deibert CP, Hankinson TC, Lew SM, Iskandar BJ, Bragg TM, Frim D, Grant G, Gupta N, Auguste KI, Nikas DC, Vassilyadi M, Muh CR, Wetjen NM, Lam SK (2018) Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:1–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3171/​2018.​3.​PEDS17234 CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Sanan A, Haines SJ (1997) Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 40:588–603PubMed Sanan A, Haines SJ (1997) Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 40:588–603PubMed
Metadata
Title
Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients—a systematic review
Authors
Vita M. Klieverik
Kai J. Miller
Ash Singhal
Kuo Sen Han
Peter A Woerdeman
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Child's Nervous System / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Electronic ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-4025-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Child's Nervous System 9/2019 Go to the issue