Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Child's Nervous System 6/2005

01-06-2005 | Original Paper

Selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy to improve functional abilities: evaluation of criteria for selection

Authors: Petra E. M. van Schie, R. Jeroen Vermeulen, Willem J. R. van Ouwerkerk, Gert Kwakkel, Jules G. Becher

Published in: Child's Nervous System | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) on functional abilities in a well-defined group of ambulatory children with spastic diplegia.

Methods

Nine children were selected for SDR (mean age 65 months, range 43–82 months). Gross motor function was measured with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88). Self-care was assessed with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and gait pattern was measured with the Edinburgh Visual Gait Score (EGS). There were nine single-case research designs with a 12-month follow-up after surgery.

Results

After 12 months the mean improvement in the total GMFM-88 scores was 8.8%. On an individual level, all patients improved significantly in comparison with baseline. Functional skills and care-giver assistance measured with the PEDI showed significant improvement. Improvement in gait was also found; in particular, better initial contact and heel-lift resulted in an increased EGS.

Conclusion

In this well-defined group of ambulatory children SDR had a small but significant positive effect on gross motor function, self-care and gait pattern.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams J, Cahan LD, Perry J, Beeler LM (1995) Foot contact pattern following selective dorsal rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:76–81 Adams J, Cahan LD, Perry J, Beeler LM (1995) Foot contact pattern following selective dorsal rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:76–81
2.
go back to reference Backman CL, Harris SR (1999) Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: comparisons and contrasts. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78:170–176CrossRef Backman CL, Harris SR (1999) Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: comparisons and contrasts. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78:170–176CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Becher JG, Lankhorst GJ, van Bennekom CAM, Vogelaar TW (1999) Measurement of the effect of a bolus dose of intrathecal baclofen by a repetitive movement test. J Neurol 246:1080–1085CrossRef Becher JG, Lankhorst GJ, van Bennekom CAM, Vogelaar TW (1999) Measurement of the effect of a bolus dose of intrathecal baclofen by a repetitive movement test. J Neurol 246:1080–1085CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Damiano DL, Quinlivan JM, Owen BF, Payne P, Nelson KC, Abel MF (2002) What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? Dev Med Child Neurol 44:112–118 Damiano DL, Quinlivan JM, Owen BF, Payne P, Nelson KC, Abel MF (2002) What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? Dev Med Child Neurol 44:112–118
5.
go back to reference Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J (1990) Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther 70:602–610 Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J (1990) Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther 70:602–610
6.
go back to reference Graubert C, Song KM, McLaughling JF, Bjornson KF (2000) Changes in gait at 1 year post-selective dorsal rhizotomy: results of a prospective randomised study. J Pediatr Orthop 20:496–500 Graubert C, Song KM, McLaughling JF, Bjornson KF (2000) Changes in gait at 1 year post-selective dorsal rhizotomy: results of a prospective randomised study. J Pediatr Orthop 20:496–500
7.
go back to reference Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJ (1982) Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI): version 1. Development, standardization and administration manual. New England Center Hospital, Boston Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJ (1982) Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI): version 1. Development, standardization and administration manual. New England Center Hospital, Boston
8.
go back to reference Harlaar J, Redmeijer RA, Tump P, Peters R, Hautus E (2000) The SYBAR system: integrated recording and display of video, EMG, and force plate data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:11–16 Harlaar J, Redmeijer RA, Tump P, Peters R, Hautus E (2000) The SYBAR system: integrated recording and display of video, EMG, and force plate data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:11–16
9.
go back to reference Kazdin AE (1982) Single-care research design: methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press, New York Kazdin AE (1982) Single-care research design: methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press, New York
10.
go back to reference McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, Price R, Temkin N (1998) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomised clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:220–232 McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, Price R, Temkin N (1998) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomised clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:220–232
11.
go back to reference McLaughlin JF, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright V, Reiner A, Roberts R, Drake J, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Barber J, Ferrel A (2002) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:17–25 McLaughlin JF, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright V, Reiner A, Roberts R, Drake J, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Barber J, Ferrel A (2002) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:17–25
12.
go back to reference Mittal S, Farmer JP, Al-Atassi B, Gibis J, Kennedy E, Galli C, Courchesnes G, Poulin C, Cantin MA, Benaroch TE (2002) Long-term functional outcome after selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 97:315–325 Mittal S, Farmer JP, Al-Atassi B, Gibis J, Kennedy E, Galli C, Courchesnes G, Poulin C, Cantin MA, Benaroch TE (2002) Long-term functional outcome after selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 97:315–325
13.
go back to reference Nordmark E, Jarnlo G, Hägglund G (2000) Comparison of the gross motor function measure and paediatric evaluation of disability inventory in assessing motor function in children undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:245–252CrossRef Nordmark E, Jarnlo G, Hägglund G (2000) Comparison of the gross motor function measure and paediatric evaluation of disability inventory in assessing motor function in children undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:245–252CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pandyan AD, Johnson GR (1999) A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil 13:373–383CrossRef Pandyan AD, Johnson GR (1999) A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil 13:373–383CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Read HS, Hazlewood ME, Hillman SJ, Prescott RJ, Robb JE (2003) Edinburgh Visual Gait Score for use in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 23:296–301CrossRefPubMed Read HS, Hazlewood ME, Hillman SJ, Prescott RJ, Robb JE (2003) Edinburgh Visual Gait Score for use in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 23:296–301CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S (1989) The gross motor function measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 31:341–352 Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S (1989) The gross motor function measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 31:341–352
17.
go back to reference Steinbok P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong TW, Chochrane DD, Kestle J (1997) A randomised clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:178–184 Steinbok P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong TW, Chochrane DD, Kestle J (1997) A randomised clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:178–184
18.
go back to reference Thomas SS, Aiona MD, Pierce R, Piatt JH (1996) Gait changes in children with spastic diplegia after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 16:747–752 Thomas SS, Aiona MD, Pierce R, Piatt JH (1996) Gait changes in children with spastic diplegia after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 16:747–752
19.
go back to reference Wichers MJ, van der Schouw YT, Moons KG, Stam HJ, van Nieuwenhuizen O (2001) Prevalence of cerebral palsy in the Netherlands (1977–1988). Eur J Epidemiol 17:527–532CrossRef Wichers MJ, van der Schouw YT, Moons KG, Stam HJ, van Nieuwenhuizen O (2001) Prevalence of cerebral palsy in the Netherlands (1977–1988). Eur J Epidemiol 17:527–532CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wright FV, Sheil EMH, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S (1998) Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:239–247 Wright FV, Sheil EMH, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S (1998) Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:239–247
Metadata
Title
Selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy to improve functional abilities: evaluation of criteria for selection
Authors
Petra E. M. van Schie
R. Jeroen Vermeulen
Willem J. R. van Ouwerkerk
Gert Kwakkel
Jules G. Becher
Publication date
01-06-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Child's Nervous System / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0256-7040
Electronic ISSN: 1433-0350
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-1105-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

Child's Nervous System 6/2005 Go to the issue