Top

World Journal of Urology

Published in:

01-07-2019 | Original Article

Versatile algorithmic midline approach to perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures

Authors: Maxim J. McKibben, Alexander T. Rozanski, Joceline S. Fuchs, Varun Sundaram, Allen F. Morey

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 7/2019

Abstract

Purpose

To present results of an algorithmic approach to perineal urethrostomy (PU) based on a midline perineal incision among men with complex urethral strictures.

Methods

A single surgeon retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent PU between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Patient demographics and outcomes were collected via medical record review. After a midline perineal incision, the PU was matured either by (a) mobilization of the urethral plate (loop) alone in cases with distal strictures or low body mass index (BMI), or (b) with creation of a lateral perineal skin flap (7-flap) for those with longer urethra-to-skin distances. Success was defined as functional voiding without the need for further procedures. Patients were contacted by phone and administered validated questionnaires.

Results

Of 62 PU patients, 20 (32.3%) underwent the loop technique, and 42 (67.7%) had the 7-flap procedure, 7 of which were reoperative for prior failed PU. Median age was 61.9 years (range 23–85) and the median stricture length was 8.0 cm (range 2.5–18 cm). Mean BMI was greater among 7-flap compared to loop patients (34.9 vs. 30.0 kg/m², p = 0.01). Success rates were 92.9% (39/42) in the 7-flap group and 100% (20/20) in the loop PU cohort during a median follow-up of 30.7 months. Among 62 PU patients, 19 (30.6%) responded to the survey—median PGI-I score was 1.0 (range 1–2) indicating that symptoms were “very much improved”.

Conclusions

The algorithmic midline approach to PU offers a standardized, versatile solution with excellent surgical outcomes and high patient satisfaction, even in obese or refractory stricture patients.

Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Romano G, Lazzeri M (2009) Clinical outcome and quality of life assessment in patients treated with perineal urethrostomy for anterior urethral stricture disease. J Urol 182(2):548–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.012 CrossRefPubMed

Peterson AC, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, Guanzoni G, Barbagli G, Webster GD (2004) Heroic measures may not always be justified in extensive urethral stricture due to lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). Urology 64(3):565–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.035 CrossRefPubMed

Blandy JP, Singh M, Tresidder GC (1968) Urethroplasty by scrotal flap for long urethral strictures. Br J Urol 40(3):261–267CrossRefPubMed

French D, Hudak SJ, Morey AF (2011) The “7-flap” perineal urethrostomy. Urology 77(6):1487–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.053 CrossRefPubMed

Parker DC, Morey AF, Simhan J (2015) 7-flap perineal urethrostomy. Transl Androl Urol 4(1):51–55. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.03 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101CrossRef

Hudson DA (2000) Some thoughts on choosing a Z-plasty: the Z made simple. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(3):665–671CrossRefPubMed

Bascom A, Ghosh S, Fairey AS, Rourke KF (2016) Assessment of wound complications after bulbar urethroplasty: the impact of a lambda perineal incision. Urology 90:184–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.047 CrossRefPubMed

Bugeja S, Andrich DE, Mundy AR (2015) Non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty. Transl Androl Urol 4(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.07 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Gomez RG, Campos RA, Velarde LG (2016) Reconstruction of pelvic fracture urethral injuries with sparing of the bulbar arteries. Urology 88:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.032 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Barbagli G, Sansalone S, Romano G, Lazzeri M (2012) Bulbar urethroplasty: transecting vs. nontransecting techniques. Curr Opin Urol 22(6):474–477. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835749be CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jordan GH, Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R (2007) The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction. J Urol 177(5):1799–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.036 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Myers JB, Porten SP, McAninch JW (2011) The outcomes of perineal urethrostomy with preservation of the dorsal urethral plate and urethral blood supply. Urology 77(5):1223–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.041 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Mokhless I, Youssif M, Eltayeb M, Hanna M (2011) Z-plasty for sculpturing of the bifid scrotum in severe hypospadias associated with penoscrotal transposition. J Pediatr Urol 7(3):305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.023 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Xu JG, Lv C, Wang YC, Zhu J, Xue CY (2015) Management of concealed penis with modified penoplasty. Urology 85(3):698–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.044 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Venn SN, Mundy AR (1998) Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol 81(5):735–737CrossRefPubMed

17.

Potts BA, Belsante MJ, Peterson AC (2016) Intraurethral steroids are a safe and effective treatment for stricture disease in patients with biopsy proven lichen sclerosus. J Urol 195(6):1790–1796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.067 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Granieri MA, Peterson AC, Madden-Fuentes RJ (2017) Effect of lichen sclerosis on success of urethroplasty. Urol Clin North Am 44(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.08.004 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Patel CK, Buckley JC, Zinman LN, Vanni AJ (2016) Outcomes for management of lichen sclerosus urethral strictures by 3 different techniques. Urology 91:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.057 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Kirpekar D, Mirri F, Lazzeri M (2009) Lichen sclerosus of the male genitalia and urethra: surgical options and results in a multicenter international experience with 215 patients. Eur Urol 55(4):945–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.046 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Belsante MJ, Selph JP, Peterson AC (2015) The contemporary management of urethral strictures in men resulting from lichen sclerosus. Transl Androl Urol 4(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Tausch TJ, Peterson AC (2012) Early aggressive treatment of lichen sclerosus may prevent disease progression. J Urol 187(6):2101–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.071 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Morey AF, Tran LK, Zinman LM (2000) Q-flap reconstruction of panurethral strictures. BJU Int 86(9):1039–1042CrossRefPubMed

24.

Fuchs JS, Shakir N, McKibben MJ (2018) Changing trends in reconstruction of complex anterior urethral strictures: from skin flap to perineal urethrostomy. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.009 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Versatile algorithmic midline approach to perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures
Authors: Maxim J. McKibben
Alexander T. Rozanski
Joceline S. Fuchs
Varun Sundaram
Allen F. Morey
Publication date: 01-07-2019
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: World Journal of Urology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2522-1

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Versatile algorithmic midline approach to perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging characterize CT-indeterminate renal masses? A prospective evaluation with histological confirmation

From indecision to precision: advances in imaging in metastatic prostate cancer

Survival effect of perioperative systemic chemotherapy on overall mortality in locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

Comparison of < 100 cc prostates and > 100 cc prostates undergoing aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Aquablation of the prostate: single-center results of a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort

Cholecalciferol for the prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infection among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, comparative study