Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019 | Original Article

Treating benign ureteroenteric strictures: 27-year experience comparing endourological techniques with open surgical approach

Authors: M. J. van Son, M. T. W. T. Lock, M. Peters, E. E. Fransen van de Putte, R. P. Meijer

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare open surgical anastomotic revision with endourological techniques for the treatment of ureteroenteric strictures in patients with urinary diversions.

Methods

All records of patients treated for ureteroenteric strictures in our clinic between 1989 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. In 76 patients, 161 completed procedures were analyzed: 26 open revisions vs. 135 endourological treatments, including balloon dilation, Wallstent and/or laser vaporization.

Results

Median follow-up was 34 months. At 60 months, patency rates were 69% (95% CI 52–92%) after open vs. 27% (95% CI 19–39%) after endo-treatment (p = 0.003); median patency duration was 15.5 vs. 5 months, respectively (p = 0.014). Eventually, 15% of patients required open surgery after primary endo-treatment and 21% received endoscopic re-treatment after primary open surgery. Cox regression analysis revealed no confounding factors among the risk factors added to the model. Complication rates were higher after open surgery (27% Clavien 2, 12% Clavien 3–4 vs. 5% Clavien 1–2, 3% Clavien 3, p = 0.528). Median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (open) vs. 2 days (endo), p < 0.001. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate improved with + 17 (open) vs. + 8.1 (endo), p = 0.024. Renal function was compromised in 8% of patients in the open surgery group vs. 6% in the endo-treatment group.

Conclusions

In these patients, in terms of patency and patency duration, open surgery was superior to endourology. Nevertheless, endourological treatments offer a safe and less-invasive alternative to delay or avoid open surgery, especially in patients who are unfit for open surgery.
Literature
13.
go back to reference DiMarco DS, LeRoy AJ, Thieling S, Bergstralh EJ, Segura JW (2001) Long-term results of treatment for ureteroenteric strictures. Urology 58(6):909–913CrossRefPubMed DiMarco DS, LeRoy AJ, Thieling S, Bergstralh EJ, Segura JW (2001) Long-term results of treatment for ureteroenteric strictures. Urology 58(6):909–913CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111 Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45(3):1–67CrossRef van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45(3):1–67CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Team RC (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Team RC (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
21.
go back to reference Rivera M, Viers B, Cockerill P et al (2015) Clinical outcomes of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture management. J Urol 193(4):E344–E345 Rivera M, Viers B, Cockerill P et al (2015) Clinical outcomes of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture management. J Urol 193(4):E344–E345
Metadata
Title
Treating benign ureteroenteric strictures: 27-year experience comparing endourological techniques with open surgical approach
Authors
M. J. van Son
M. T. W. T. Lock
M. Peters
E. E. Fransen van de Putte
R. P. Meijer
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2475-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

World Journal of Urology 6/2019 Go to the issue