Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Original Article

Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report

Authors: Takashi Yoshida, Takaaki Inoue, Makoto Taguchi, Naoto Omura, Hidefumi Kinoshita, Tadashi Matsuda

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical significance of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) for predicting spontaneous passage (SP) of uncomplicated ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 418 patients with a diagnosis of uncomplicated ureteral stones who presented to Kori Hospital from 2011 to 2018. The maximum stone diameter and UWT at the stone site were measured from axial computed tomography images. Clinical predictors of 4-week SP were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to evaluate the accuracy of factors in predicting SP of ureteral stones.

Results

Of the 418 patients, 202 (48.3%) spontaneously passed their stones within 4 weeks of their initial visit. Multivariate analysis showed that stone location, stone size, and UWT (odds ratio, 0.40; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of 4-week SP. ROC analysis showed that 2.71 mm was the optimal cut-off value for UWT, with a predictive accuracy of 0.83. Low UWT had a significantly higher 4-week SP rate than high UWT (76.4% vs. 14.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). In addition, high UWT was associated with a higher risk of stone-related complications within 4 weeks compared with low UWT (16.4% vs. 7.2%, respectively; P = 0.0044).

Conclusions

UWT can serve as a potential predictive factor for 4-week SP and may help physicians to select patients who require immediate interventions among those with ≤ 10-mm ureteral stones.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elton TJ, Roth CS, Berquist TH, Silverstein MD (1993) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of ureteral calculi in emergency departments. J Gen Intern Med 8:57–62CrossRef Elton TJ, Roth CS, Berquist TH, Silverstein MD (1993) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of ureteral calculi in emergency departments. J Gen Intern Med 8:57–62CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stewart C (1988) Nephrolithiasis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 6:617–630PubMed Stewart C (1988) Nephrolithiasis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 6:617–630PubMed
3.
go back to reference Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol 196:1161–1169CrossRef Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol 196:1161–1169CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRef Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC (2002) Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:101–103CrossRef Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC (2002) Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:101–103CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mugiya S, Ito T, Maruyama S, Hadano S, Nagae H (2004) Endoscopic features of impacted ureteral stones. J Urol 171:89–91CrossRef Mugiya S, Ito T, Maruyama S, Hadano S, Nagae H (2004) Endoscopic features of impacted ureteral stones. J Urol 171:89–91CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Albanis S, Serafetinides E, Varkarakis J, Protogerou V (2003) Management and follow-up of impacted ureteral stones. Urol Int 70:269–272CrossRef Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Albanis S, Serafetinides E, Varkarakis J, Protogerou V (2003) Management and follow-up of impacted ureteral stones. Urol Int 70:269–272CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sarica K, Kafkasli A, Yazici Ö et al (2015) Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL. Urolithiasis 43:83–88CrossRef Sarica K, Kafkasli A, Yazici Ö et al (2015) Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL. Urolithiasis 43:83–88CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yoshida T, Inoue T, Omura N et al (2017) Ureteral wall thickness as a preoperative indicator of impacted stones in patients with ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urology 106:45–49CrossRef Yoshida T, Inoue T, Omura N et al (2017) Ureteral wall thickness as a preoperative indicator of impacted stones in patients with ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urology 106:45–49CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480CrossRef Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kaneko T, Matsushima H, Morimoto H, Tsuzaka Y, Homma Y (2010) Efficacy of low dose tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones in Japanese male patients: a randomized controlled study. Int J Urol 17:462–465CrossRefPubMed Kaneko T, Matsushima H, Morimoto H, Tsuzaka Y, Homma Y (2010) Efficacy of low dose tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones in Japanese male patients: a randomized controlled study. Int J Urol 17:462–465CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Li J, Tang Z, Gao L, Qin F, Yuan J (2017) Efficacy and safety of naftopidil in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 31:427–437CrossRefPubMed Li J, Tang Z, Gao L, Qin F, Yuan J (2017) Efficacy and safety of naftopidil in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 31:427–437CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sur RL, Shore N, L’Esperance J et al (2015) Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 67:959–964CrossRefPubMed Sur RL, Shore N, L’Esperance J et al (2015) Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 67:959–964CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bensalah K, Pearle M, Lotan Y (2008) Cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. Eur Urol 53:411–418CrossRefPubMed Bensalah K, Pearle M, Lotan Y (2008) Cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. Eur Urol 53:411–418CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Skolarikos A, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G, Kural AR, de la Rosette JJ (2010) The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol 24:923–930CrossRefPubMed Skolarikos A, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G, Kural AR, de la Rosette JJ (2010) The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol 24:923–930CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nazim SM, Ather MH, Khan N (2014) Measurement of ureteric stone diameter in different planes on multidetector computed tomography–impact on the clinical decision making. Urology 83:288–292CrossRefPubMed Nazim SM, Ather MH, Khan N (2014) Measurement of ureteric stone diameter in different planes on multidetector computed tomography–impact on the clinical decision making. Urology 83:288–292CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Metser U, Ghai S, Ong YY, Lockwood G, Radomski SB (2009) Assessment of urinary tract calculi with 64-MDCT: the axial versus coronal plane. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1509–1513CrossRefPubMed Metser U, Ghai S, Ong YY, Lockwood G, Radomski SB (2009) Assessment of urinary tract calculi with 64-MDCT: the axial versus coronal plane. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1509–1513CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kadihasanoglu M, Marien T, Miller NL (2017) Ureteral stone diameter on computerized tomography coronal reconstructions is clinically important and under-reported. Urology 102:54–60CrossRefPubMed Kadihasanoglu M, Marien T, Miller NL (2017) Ureteral stone diameter on computerized tomography coronal reconstructions is clinically important and under-reported. Urology 102:54–60CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sfoungaristos S, Kavouras A, Katafigiotis I, Perimenis P (2012) Role of white blood cell and neutrophil counts in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic. BJU Int 110:E339–E345CrossRef Sfoungaristos S, Kavouras A, Katafigiotis I, Perimenis P (2012) Role of white blood cell and neutrophil counts in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic. BJU Int 110:E339–E345CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Özcan C, Aydoğdu O, Senocak C et al (2015) Predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage and the potential role of serum C-reactive protein in patients with 4 to 10 mm distal ureteral stones: a prospective clinical study. J Urol 194:1009–1013CrossRef Özcan C, Aydoğdu O, Senocak C et al (2015) Predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage and the potential role of serum C-reactive protein in patients with 4 to 10 mm distal ureteral stones: a prospective clinical study. J Urol 194:1009–1013CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report
Authors
Takashi Yoshida
Takaaki Inoue
Makoto Taguchi
Naoto Omura
Hidefumi Kinoshita
Tadashi Matsuda
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2461-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

World Journal of Urology 5/2019 Go to the issue