Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Topic Paper

Importance of metastatic volume in prognostic models to predict survival in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer

Authors: Sarah Buelens, Elise De Bleser, Bert Dhondt, Wesley Verla, Karel Decaestecker, Piet Ost, Valérie Fonteyne, Kathia De Man, Chloë Standaert, Sylvie Rottey, Nicolaas Lumen

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the prognostic importance of metastatic volume in a contemporary daily practice cohort of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer (mHNPC) and to develop a pragmatic prognostic model to predict survival for these patients.

Methods

Since 2014, 113 patients with newly diagnosed mHNPC were prospectively registered. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0™ with two-sided p value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic risk factors. Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank statistics was constructed to analyze difference in survival in the prognostic groups. Model performance was assessed using the Concordance-index (C-index) and cross-validated in R v3.4.1. High-volume mHNPC (HVD) was defined as the presence of visceral metastasis or ≥ 4 bone metastases with ≥ 1 appendicular lesion.

Results

Multivariate analysis identified HVD (p = 0.047) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (p = 0.018) as independent prognostic risk factors for overall survival (OS). Consequently, three prognostic groups were created: a good (no risk factors), intermediate (1 risk factor) and poor prognosis group (2 risk factors). Median OS for the good, intermediate and poor prognosis group was not reached, 73 and 20 months (95% CI 9–31 months with p < 0.001 and Correspondence-index of 0.78), respectively.

Conclusions

We developed a pragmatic and qualitative prognostic model consisting of three prognostic risk groups for OS in a daily practice cohort of patients with newly diagnosed mHNPC. Independent prognostic risk factors included in the model were HVD and abnormal ALP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
18.
go back to reference Efron B, Tibshirani R (1997) Improvements on cross-validation: the. 632 + Bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 92(438):548–560 Efron B, Tibshirani R (1997) Improvements on cross-validation: the. 632 + Bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 92(438):548–560
Metadata
Title
Importance of metastatic volume in prognostic models to predict survival in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer
Authors
Sarah Buelens
Elise De Bleser
Bert Dhondt
Wesley Verla
Karel Decaestecker
Piet Ost
Valérie Fonteyne
Kathia De Man
Chloë Standaert
Sylvie Rottey
Nicolaas Lumen
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2449-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

World Journal of Urology 12/2019 Go to the issue