Top

World Journal of Urology

Published in:

01-09-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Suprapubic versus urethral catheter drainage in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: advancing systematic review quality

Authors: Eu Chang Hwang, Michael C. Risk, Philipp Dahm

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 9/2018

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …

Bertolo R, Tracey A, Dasgupta P, Rocco B, Micali S, Bianchi G et al (2018) Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2275-x CrossRefPubMed

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J et al (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Clark HD, Wells GA, Huet C, McAlister FA, Salmi LR, Fergusson D et al (1999) Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 20(5):448–452CrossRefPubMed

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):1–173CrossRef

Prasad SM, Large MC, Patel AR et al (2014) Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 192(1):89–95CrossRefPubMed

Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (2011) Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (ed), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed Mar 2011

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ et al (2008) What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336(7651):995–998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yang CJ, Ou YC, Yang CK (2015) Percutaneous cystostomy drainage for early removing urethral catheter in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: improving on patients’ discomfort. Urol Sci 26:240–242CrossRef

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D et al (2011) GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293CrossRefPubMed

10.

Martinschek A, Pfalzgraf D, Rafail B, Ritter M, Heinrich E, Trojan L (2016) Transurethral versus suprapubic catheter at robotassisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up. World J Urol 34(3):407–411CrossRefPubMed

Title: Suprapubic versus urethral catheter drainage in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: advancing systematic review quality
Authors: Eu Chang Hwang
Michael C. Risk
Philipp Dahm
Publication date: 01-09-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: World Journal of Urology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2372-x

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Suprapubic versus urethral catheter drainage in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: advancing systematic review quality

Excerpt

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Urologists’ attitudes to sexual complications of LUTS/BPH treatments

Contemporary rates of adherence to international guidelines for pelvic lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy: a population-based study

The relationship between HPV status and chemoradiotherapy in the locoregional control of penile cancer

Cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis for children in the RIVUR trial

Local staging with multiparametric MRI in daily clinical practice: diagnostic accuracy and evaluation of a radiologic learning curve

Epidemiology and screening for renal cancer