Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Article

Outcome of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone with overnight ureteral catheterization: a propensity score-matching analysis

Authors: Mitsuru Komeya, Kimitsugu Usui, Takuo Asai, Takehiko Ogawa, Masataka Taguri, Koshi Kataoka, Masahiro Yao, Junichi Matsuzaki

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of overnight ureteral catheterization and determine if routine long-term post-stenting can be avoided in flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) procedure for kidney stone.

Methods

Three hundred ninety-three patients who underwent single fURS for kidney stone between January 2013 and June 2016 at a single institute were retrospectively analyzed. The stone-free (SF) and perioperative complication rates in patients with routine long-term post-stenting after fURS (long-term stent group) were compared with those of patients with overnight ureteral catheterization (short-term stent group). Propensity score-matching analysis was used to adjust the difference in baseline preoperative parameters between the two groups. All preoperative parameters were chosen to develop the propensity score, and 74 patients in the short-term stent group were retrospectively matched with the patients in the long-term stent group at a 1:1 ratio.

Results

Patient characteristics included age, sex, side of involvement, height, body weight, body mass index, number of stone(s), stone volume, Hounsfield units of stone, preoperative white blood cell count, preoperative C-reactive protein, preoperative creatinine, pretreatment, pre-stenting, stenosis of the ureter, and procedure duration. The SF rates were 91.9 and 93.2% in the short-term and long-term stent groups, respectively. Perioperative complications were 14.9 and 12.2%. No difference was noted between the two groups in terms of SF and perioperative complication rates.

Conclusions

Short-term post-stenting using overnight ureteral catheterization in uncomplicated cases after fURS for kidney stone was as effective as conventional long-term post-stenting in reducing postoperative complications. These preliminary data suggest the possibility that routine long-term post-stenting was unnecessary.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG (2009) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 55:1190–1197CrossRef Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG (2009) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 55:1190–1197CrossRef
2.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, Ibrahim HM, Youssef RF, Sheir KZ (2012) Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10–20 mm. BJU Int 110:898–902CrossRef El-Nahas AR, Ibrahim HM, Youssef RF, Sheir KZ (2012) Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10–20 mm. BJU Int 110:898–902CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M (2031) Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int 111(3 Pt B):E127–E131 Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M (2031) Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int 111(3 Pt B):E127–E131
4.
go back to reference Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier? J Urol 179:981–984CrossRef Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier? J Urol 179:981–984CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM, Nadler RB et al (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 179(Suppl):2005–2009 Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM, Nadler RB et al (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 179(Suppl):2005–2009
6.
go back to reference Papatsoris A, Sarica K (2012) Flexible ureterorenoscopic management of upper tract pathologies. Urol Res 40:639–646CrossRef Papatsoris A, Sarica K (2012) Flexible ureterorenoscopic management of upper tract pathologies. Urol Res 40:639–646CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T (2012) Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol 19:264–267CrossRef Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T (2012) Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol 19:264–267CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y et al (2012) The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. Urology 80:524–528CrossRef Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y et al (2012) The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. Urology 80:524–528CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y et al (2013) Utility and limitation of cumulative stone diameter in predicting urinary stone burden at flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. PLoS One 8:8–12 Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y et al (2013) Utility and limitation of cumulative stone diameter in predicting urinary stone burden at flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. PLoS One 8:8–12
10.
go back to reference Ito H, Sakamaki K, Kawahara T, Terao H, Yasuda K, Kuroda S et al (2015) Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. BJU Int 115:446–451CrossRef Ito H, Sakamaki K, Kawahara T, Terao H, Yasuda K, Kuroda S et al (2015) Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. BJU Int 115:446–451CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, De La Rosette J, Preminger G (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179:424–430CrossRef Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, De La Rosette J, Preminger G (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179:424–430CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nabi G, Cook J, N’Dow J, McClinton S (2007) Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334:572CrossRef Nabi G, Cook J, N’Dow J, McClinton S (2007) Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334:572CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125–1130CrossRef Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y et al (2012) Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 26:1125–1130CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S, Shore DM, Nadler RB (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21:1277–1280CrossRef Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S, Shore DM, Nadler RB (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21:1277–1280CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R, Gómez-Marín O (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768–2774CrossRef Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R, Gómez-Marín O (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768–2774CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jensen MP, McFarland CA (1993) Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 55:195–203CrossRef Jensen MP, McFarland CA (1993) Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 55:195–203CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRef Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A, Plothe KD, Thelen P, Ringert RH et al (2013) Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol 31:855–859CrossRef Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A, Plothe KD, Thelen P, Ringert RH et al (2013) Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol 31:855–859CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1219CrossRef Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1219CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Ishigaki H, Ogawa T, Uemura H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRef Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Ishigaki H, Ogawa T, Uemura H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhang J, Xu C, He D, Lu Y, Hu H, Qin B et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. PeerJ 4:e2728CrossRef Zhang J, Xu C, He D, Lu Y, Hu H, Qin B et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. PeerJ 4:e2728CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B (2008) Influence of pyelocaliceal anatomy on the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach. J Endourol 22:2235–2239CrossRef Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B (2008) Influence of pyelocaliceal anatomy on the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach. J Endourol 22:2235–2239CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wong MYC (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy is the ideal choice to manage a 1.5 cm diameter lower-pole stone. J Endourol 22:1845–1846 (discussion 1859) CrossRef Wong MYC (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy is the ideal choice to manage a 1.5 cm diameter lower-pole stone. J Endourol 22:1845–1846 (discussion 1859) CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S (2009) Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 23:1395–1398CrossRef Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S (2009) Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 23:1395–1398CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lim SH, Jeong BC, Il Seo S, Jeon SS, Han DH (2010) Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free. Korean J Urol 51:777–782CrossRef Lim SH, Jeong BC, Il Seo S, Jeon SS, Han DH (2010) Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free. Korean J Urol 51:777–782CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D, Xue W, Roelofs A, Duvdevani M et al (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) Ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRef Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D, Xue W, Roelofs A, Duvdevani M et al (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) Ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcome of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone with overnight ureteral catheterization: a propensity score-matching analysis
Authors
Mitsuru Komeya
Kimitsugu Usui
Takuo Asai
Takehiko Ogawa
Masataka Taguri
Koshi Kataoka
Masahiro Yao
Junichi Matsuzaki
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2328-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

World Journal of Urology 11/2018 Go to the issue