Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy

Authors: Hakmin Lee, Chan Kyo Kim, Byung Kwan Park, Hyun Hwan Sung, Deok Hyun Han, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Han Yong Choi, Hyun Moo Lee

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

We investigated the accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for preoperative staging and its influence on the determination of neurovascular bundle sparing and disease prognosis in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Methods

We reviewed 1045 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with preoperative mpMRI at a single institution. Clinical local stages determined from mpMRI were correlated with preoperative and postoperative pathological outcomes.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity to diagnose seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) on mpMRI were 43.8 and 95.4 %, respectively. The negative predictive value was 78.9 %. The sensitivity and specificity to diagnose extracapsular extension (ECE) were 54.5 and 80.5 %, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing pathological T3 or higher were 52.6 and 82.1 %, respectively. Non-organ-confined disease determined by mpMRI was significantly associated with positive surgical margin and pathological T3 disease on multivariate analysis. Preoperative adverse findings on mpMRI were significantly associated with performance of the non-nerve-sparing technique.

Conclusion

mpMRI did not show outstanding diagnostic accuracy relative to our expectations in predicting SVI or ECE preoperatively. However, adverse findings on preoperative mpMRI were significantly related to worse postoperative pathological outcomes as well as postoperative biochemical recurrence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M et al (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68:8–19CrossRefPubMed Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M et al (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68:8–19CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Park SY, Jung DC, Oh YT, Cho NH, Choi YD, Rha KH, Hong SJ, Han K (2016) Prostate cancer: PI-RADS version 2 helps preoperatively predict clinically significant cancers. Radiology 2:151133 Park SY, Jung DC, Oh YT, Cho NH, Choi YD, Rha KH, Hong SJ, Han K (2016) Prostate cancer: PI-RADS version 2 helps preoperatively predict clinically significant cancers. Radiology 2:151133
5.
go back to reference Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Fossati N, Salonia A, Mottrie A, Catto J, Montorsi F (2016) The problem is not what to do with indolent and harmless prostate cancer—the problem is how to avoid finding these cancers. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.032 Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Fossati N, Salonia A, Mottrie A, Catto J, Montorsi F (2016) The problem is not what to do with indolent and harmless prostate cancer—the problem is how to avoid finding these cancers. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2016.​02.​032
6.
go back to reference Grenabo Bergdahl A, Wilderäng U, Aus G et al (2015) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer SCREENING: a pilot study within the Göteborg randomised screening trial. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.006 Grenabo Bergdahl A, Wilderäng U, Aus G et al (2015) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer SCREENING: a pilot study within the Göteborg randomised screening trial. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2015.​12.​006
7.
go back to reference Ito H, Kamoi K, Yokoyama K, Yamada K, Nishimura T (2003) Visualization of prostate cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with transrectal power Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol 76(909):617–624CrossRefPubMed Ito H, Kamoi K, Yokoyama K, Yamada K, Nishimura T (2003) Visualization of prostate cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with transrectal power Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol 76(909):617–624CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Johnson LM, Turkbey B, Figg WD, Choyke PL (2014) Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:346–353CrossRefPubMed Johnson LM, Turkbey B, Figg WD, Choyke PL (2014) Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:346–353CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Abdi H, Pourmalek F, Zargar H et al (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of significant tumor in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Urology 85(2):423–428CrossRefPubMed Abdi H, Pourmalek F, Zargar H et al (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of significant tumor in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Urology 85(2):423–428CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450CrossRefPubMed Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Billing A, Buchner A, Stief C, Roosen A (2015) Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice. World J Urol 33:923–928CrossRefPubMed Billing A, Buchner A, Stief C, Roosen A (2015) Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice. World J Urol 33:923–928CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Johnston R, Wong LM, Warren A, Shah N, Neal D (2013) The role of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostate cancer. ANZ J Surg 83:234–238CrossRefPubMed Johnston R, Wong LM, Warren A, Shah N, Neal D (2013) The role of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostate cancer. ANZ J Surg 83:234–238CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2015) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol S0302-2838(15):00674 de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2015) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol S0302-2838(15):00674
14.
go back to reference Roethke MC, Lichy MP, Kniess M et al (2013) Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and inXuence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 31:1111–1116CrossRefPubMed Roethke MC, Lichy MP, Kniess M et al (2013) Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and inXuence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 31:1111–1116CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC et al (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100:2655–2663CrossRefPubMed Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC et al (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100:2655–2663CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jeong IG, Lim JH, You D et al (2013) Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for clinically high risk prostate cancer in 922 radical prostatectomies. J Urol 190:2054–2060CrossRefPubMed Jeong IG, Lim JH, You D et al (2013) Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for clinically high risk prostate cancer in 922 radical prostatectomies. J Urol 190:2054–2060CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy
Authors
Hakmin Lee
Chan Kyo Kim
Byung Kwan Park
Hyun Hwan Sung
Deok Hyun Han
Hwang Gyun Jeon
Byong Chang Jeong
Seong Il Seo
Seong Soo Jeon
Han Yong Choi
Hyun Moo Lee
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1948-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

World Journal of Urology 6/2017 Go to the issue