Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Article

First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study

Authors: Steeve Doizi, Guido Kamphuis, Guido Giusti, Kim Hovgaard Andreassen, Thomas Knoll, Palle Jörn Osther, Cesare Scoffone, Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Silvia Proietti, Oliver Wiseman, Jean de la Rosette, Olivier Traxer

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

We evaluated a new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope, LithoVue™ with respect to deflection, image quality and maneuverability.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted in eight tertiary reference centers in Europe in December 2015 and January 2016. All consecutive patients included underwent flexible ureteroscopy and were 18 years or older. Deflection and image quality pre- and post-use and maneuverability were rated with a Likert scale.

Results

A total of 40 procedures were performed (five per institution). The indication for FURS was treatment of renal stones in 92.5 % of the cases. Before LithoVue™ usage, the median measured upward and downward deflections were both 270°. Image quality was rated as “very good” in 65 % of cases and “good” in 30 %. Maneuverability was “very good” in 77.5 % and “good” in 17.5 %. At the final evaluation, median upward and downward deflections were both 270°. Image quality was still “very good” in 65 % of cases and “good” in 30 % with no significant difference compared with preoperative data (p = 1). Maneuverability was “very good” in 72.5 % and “good” in 17.5 %, with no significant difference compared with preoperative data (p = 0.92). Two LithoVue™ broke during surgery (5 %): one occurring in extreme deflection with acute infundibulopelvic angle and spontaneous loss of vision for the second one.

Conclusion

The LithoVue™ displayed good image quality, active deflection and maneuverability. Further evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis will help to present the best utility of this single-use FURS in current practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T, Go T (1971) Clinical application of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscope. Urol Int 26(2):97–104CrossRefPubMed Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T, Go T (1971) Clinical application of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscope. Urol Int 26(2):97–104CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol 138(2):280–285PubMed Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol 138(2):280–285PubMed
3.
go back to reference Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMed Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O, CROES URS Study Group (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139CrossRefPubMed de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O, CROES URS Study Group (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, Sundaram CP, Dunn MD, Shalhav AL, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164(4):1164–1168CrossRefPubMed Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, Sundaram CP, Dunn MD, Shalhav AL, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164(4):1164–1168CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2002) Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology 60(5):784–788CrossRefPubMed Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Delvecchio FC, Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2002) Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology 60(5):784–788CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, Ames C, Lee C, Kuskowski M, Schwartz S, Vanlangendock R, Skenazy J, Landman J (2006) Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 176(1):137–141CrossRefPubMed Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, Ames C, Lee C, Kuskowski M, Schwartz S, Vanlangendock R, Skenazy J, Landman J (2006) Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 176(1):137–141CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K, Gattegno B, Thibault P (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68(2):276–279CrossRefPubMed Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K, Gattegno B, Thibault P (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68(2):276–279CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, Lynne CM, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG (2006) Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol 176(2):607–610CrossRefPubMed Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, Lynne CM, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG (2006) Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol 176(2):607–610CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, Holden T, Turk TM, Pedro RN, Kriedberg C, Hinck B, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Monga M (2010) Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology 75(3):534–538CrossRefPubMed Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, Holden T, Turk TM, Pedro RN, Kriedberg C, Hinck B, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Monga M (2010) Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology 75(3):534–538CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Defidio L, De Dominicis M, Di Gianfrancesco L, Fuchs G, Patel A (2012) Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. J Endourol 26(10):1329–1334CrossRefPubMed Defidio L, De Dominicis M, Di Gianfrancesco L, Fuchs G, Patel A (2012) Improving flexible ureterorenoscope durability up to 100 procedures. J Endourol 26(10):1329–1334CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Karaolides T, Bach C, Kachrilas S, Goyal A, Masood J, Buchholz N (2013) Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 81(4):717–722CrossRefPubMed Karaolides T, Bach C, Kachrilas S, Goyal A, Masood J, Buchholz N (2013) Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 81(4):717–722CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Carey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR (2014) Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Urology 84(1):42–45CrossRefPubMed Carey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR (2014) Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Urology 84(1):42–45CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Multescu R, Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Geavlete P (2014) Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: how long can you expect it to last? Urology 84(1):32–35CrossRefPubMed Multescu R, Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Geavlete P (2014) Improved durability of flex-Xc digital flexible ureteroscope: how long can you expect it to last? Urology 84(1):32–35CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shah K, Monga M, Knudsen B (2015) Prospective randomized trial comparing 2 flexible digital ureteroscopes: aCMI/Olympus invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Urology 85(6):1267–1271CrossRefPubMed Shah K, Monga M, Knudsen B (2015) Prospective randomized trial comparing 2 flexible digital ureteroscopes: aCMI/Olympus invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Urology 85(6):1267–1271CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M (2003) Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62(2):218–222CrossRefPubMed Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, Monga M (2003) Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology 62(2):218–222CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kramolowsky E, McDowell Z, Moore B, Booth B, Wood N (2016) Cost analysis of flexible ureteroscope repairs: evaluation of 655 procedures in a community-based practice. J Endourol 30(3):254–256CrossRefPubMed Kramolowsky E, McDowell Z, Moore B, Booth B, Wood N (2016) Cost analysis of flexible ureteroscope repairs: evaluation of 655 procedures in a community-based practice. J Endourol 30(3):254–256CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR (2009) Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol 23(6):903–905CrossRefPubMed Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR (2009) Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs. J Endourol 23(6):903–905CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, L’Esperance JO, Tan YH, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2005) Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology 66(5):958–963CrossRefPubMed Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, L’Esperance JO, Tan YH, Albala DM, Preminger GM (2005) Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology 66(5):958–963CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Abraham JB, Abdelshehid CS, Lee HJ, Box GN, Deane LA, Le T, Jellison F, Borin JF, Manipon A, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2007) Rapid communication: effects of steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol 21(9):985–992CrossRefPubMed Abraham JB, Abdelshehid CS, Lee HJ, Box GN, Deane LA, Le T, Jellison F, Borin JF, Manipon A, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (2007) Rapid communication: effects of steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol 21(9):985–992CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Al-Qahtani SM, Geavlete B, de Medina SG, Traxer OP (2011) The new Olympus digital flexible ureteroscope (URF-V): initial experience. Urol Ann 3(3):133–137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Qahtani SM, Geavlete B, de Medina SG, Traxer OP (2011) The new Olympus digital flexible ureteroscope (URF-V): initial experience. Urol Ann 3(3):133–137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Tosoian JJ, Ludwig W, Sopko N, Mullins JK, Matlaga BR (2015) The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program. J Endourol 29(4):406–409CrossRefPubMed Tosoian JJ, Ludwig W, Sopko N, Mullins JK, Matlaga BR (2015) The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program. J Endourol 29(4):406–409CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cone EB, Eisner BH, Ursiny M, Pareek G (2014) Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 28(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed Cone EB, Eisner BH, Ursiny M, Pareek G (2014) Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 28(6):639–643CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bagley DH (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology 29(3):296–300CrossRefPubMed Bagley DH (1987) Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology 29(3):296–300CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351CrossRefPubMed Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The Polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24(7):1061–1066CrossRefPubMed Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocaoglu Y, Sroka R, Stief CG, Reich O (2010) The Polyscope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoscope system. J Endourol 24(7):1061–1066CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25(2):317–321CrossRefPubMed Bansal H, Swain S, Sharma GK, Mathanya M, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB (2011) Polyscope: a new era in flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 25(2):317–321CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, Huang T, Zhu Y, Huang K, Chen Y, Liang C, Qi J, Huang Y (2015) Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones. Urology 86(2):224–229CrossRefPubMed Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, Huang T, Zhu Y, Huang K, Chen Y, Liang C, Qi J, Huang Y (2015) Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the management of renal stones. Urology 86(2):224–229CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Noronha AM, Brozak S (2014) A 21st century nosocomial issue with endoscopes. BMJ 19(348):g2047CrossRef Noronha AM, Brozak S (2014) A 21st century nosocomial issue with endoscopes. BMJ 19(348):g2047CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Chang CL, Su LH, Lu CM, Tai FT, Huang YC, Chang KK (2013) Outbreak of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae urinary tract infections due to a contaminated ureteroscope. J Hosp Infect 85(2):118–124CrossRefPubMed Chang CL, Su LH, Lu CM, Tai FT, Huang YC, Chang KK (2013) Outbreak of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae urinary tract infections due to a contaminated ureteroscope. J Hosp Infect 85(2):118–124CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study
Authors
Steeve Doizi
Guido Kamphuis
Guido Giusti
Kim Hovgaard Andreassen
Thomas Knoll
Palle Jörn Osther
Cesare Scoffone
Daniel Pérez-Fentes
Silvia Proietti
Oliver Wiseman
Jean de la Rosette
Olivier Traxer
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

World Journal of Urology 5/2017 Go to the issue