Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Article

Redefining the implications of nasogastric tube placement following radical cystectomy in the alvimopan era

Authors: Vignesh T. Packiam, Vijay A. Agrawal, Joseph J. Pariser, Andrew J. Cohen, Charles U. Nottingham, Shane M. Pearce, Norm D. Smith, Gary D. Steinberg

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Alvimopan has decreased ileus and need for nasogastric tube (NGT) after radical cystectomy (RC). However, the natural history of ileus versus intestinal obstruction in patients receiving alvimopan is not well defined. We sought to examine the implications of NGT placement before and after the introduction of alvimopan for RC patients.

Methods

Retrospective review identified 278 and 293 consecutive patients who underwent RC before and after instituting alvimopan between June 2009 and May 2014. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared by alvimopan status. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of alvimopan on rates of NGT placement and reoperation for bowel complications.

Results

The cohorts had similar age, stage, approach, and BMI. Patients receiving alvimopan had decreased ileus (16 vs 32 %, p < 0.01) but similar rates of reoperation for bowel complications (2.8 vs 2.7 %). On multivariate analysis, alvimopan was associated with lower risk of NGT placement (OR 0.30, p < 0.01). For patients requiring NGT placement, there was an increased rate of reoperation among patients receiving alvimopan compared with those who did not (28 vs 11 %, p = 0.03). Patients receiving alvimopan who needed NGT had significantly increased median length of stay (22 vs 7 days), need for TPN (66 vs 5.3 %), and readmission for ileus (10.3 vs 2.3 %) compared with those who did not require NGT.

Conclusions

Alvimopan significantly reduced the incidence of ileus and NGT placement following RC. NGT placement was associated with an increased need for reoperation for bowel complications in the setting of alvimopan.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
8.
go back to reference Viscusi ER, Goldstein S, Witkowski T, Andonakakis A, Jan R, Gabriel K et al (2006) Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Surg Endosc 20:64–70. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0104-y CrossRefPubMed Viscusi ER, Goldstein S, Witkowski T, Andonakakis A, Jan R, Gabriel K et al (2006) Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Surg Endosc 20:64–70. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-005-0104-y CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pariser JJ, Anderson BB, Pearce SM, Han Z, Rodriguez JA, Landon E et al (2015) The effect of broader, directed antimicrobial prophylaxis including fungal coverage on perioperative infectious complications after radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.10.007 Pariser JJ, Anderson BB, Pearce SM, Han Z, Rodriguez JA, Landon E et al (2015) The effect of broader, directed antimicrobial prophylaxis including fungal coverage on perioperative infectious complications after radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urolonc.​2015.​10.​007
11.
go back to reference Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL (1995) A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469–476 (discussion 476–478) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL (1995) A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469–476 (discussion 476–478) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Langevin JM, Kortbeek J (1992) A prospective randomized trial of routine postoperative nasogastric decompression in patients with bowel anastomosis. Can J Surg J Can Chir 35:629–632 Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Langevin JM, Kortbeek J (1992) A prospective randomized trial of routine postoperative nasogastric decompression in patients with bowel anastomosis. Can J Surg J Can Chir 35:629–632
16.
19.
go back to reference Kauf TL, Svatek RS, Amiel G, Beard TL, Chang SS, Fergany A et al (2014) Alvimopan, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, is associated with reduced costs after radical cystectomy: economic analysis of a phase 4 randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 191:1721–1727. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.015 CrossRefPubMed Kauf TL, Svatek RS, Amiel G, Beard TL, Chang SS, Fergany A et al (2014) Alvimopan, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, is associated with reduced costs after radical cystectomy: economic analysis of a phase 4 randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 191:1721–1727. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2013.​12.​015 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Vora A, Marchalik D, Nissim H, Kowalczyk K, Bandi G, McGeagh K et al (2014) Multi-institutional outcomes and cost effectiveness of using alvimopan to lower gastrointestinal morbidity after cystectomy and urinary diversion. Can J Urol 21:7222–7227PubMed Vora A, Marchalik D, Nissim H, Kowalczyk K, Bandi G, McGeagh K et al (2014) Multi-institutional outcomes and cost effectiveness of using alvimopan to lower gastrointestinal morbidity after cystectomy and urinary diversion. Can J Urol 21:7222–7227PubMed
Metadata
Title
Redefining the implications of nasogastric tube placement following radical cystectomy in the alvimopan era
Authors
Vignesh T. Packiam
Vijay A. Agrawal
Joseph J. Pariser
Andrew J. Cohen
Charles U. Nottingham
Shane M. Pearce
Norm D. Smith
Gary D. Steinberg
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1910-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

World Journal of Urology 4/2017 Go to the issue