Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Topic Paper

The state and potential of social media in bladder cancer

Author: Michael J. Leveridge

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Social media sites and services have become intimately woven into our interpersonal communications and have begun to stake a visible place in healthcare. Disease-specific Twitter hashtags, online patient groups and participation by patients, practitioners and advocacy groups are emblematic of this new paradigm.

Methods

A literature review and summary of resources and publications on bladder cancer and social media.

Results

A majority of Western patients have access to and use the Internet for health information. Urologists and oncologists have used bladder-cancer-specific messaging at international meetings infrequently as compared to prostate and other non-urologic cancers. An active community does participate in online discussion, with differences between medical practitioners and patients/advocates. Advice is given with the aim of unifying this discussion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference File Thom, Ryan Camille (2014) “Computer and internet use in the United States: 2013”, American Community Survey Reports, ACS-28. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington File Thom, Ryan Camille (2014) “Computer and internet use in the United States: 2013”, American Community Survey Reports, ACS-28. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington
4.
go back to reference Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C, Davies BJ, Averch TD, Woo HH, Stork B, Cooperberg MR, Eggener SE (2014) Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association. BJU Int 113:993–998PubMedCrossRef Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C, Davies BJ, Averch TD, Woo HH, Stork B, Cooperberg MR, Eggener SE (2014) Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association. BJU Int 113:993–998PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fuoco M, Leveridge MJ (2014) Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists. BJU Int 2015(115):491–497 Fuoco M, Leveridge MJ (2014) Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists. BJU Int 2015(115):491–497
6.
go back to reference Matta R, Doiron C, Leveridge MJ (2014) The dramatic increase in social media in urology. J Urol 192:494–498PubMedCrossRef Matta R, Doiron C, Leveridge MJ (2014) The dramatic increase in social media in urology. J Urol 192:494–498PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nason GJ, O’Kelly F, Bouchier-Hayes D, Quinlan DM, Manecksha RP (2015) Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology. Ir J Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s11845-015-1277-6 Nason GJ, O’Kelly F, Bouchier-Hayes D, Quinlan DM, Manecksha RP (2015) Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology. Ir J Med Sci. doi:10.​1007/​s11845-015-1277-6
8.
go back to reference Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, Zheng K, Hollenbeck BK, Ghani KR (2015) The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology Meeting. J Endourol 29:615–620PubMedCrossRef Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, Zheng K, Hollenbeck BK, Ghani KR (2015) The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology Meeting. J Endourol 29:615–620PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chaudhry A, Glode LM, Gillman M, Miller RS (2012) Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract 8:173–178PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chaudhry A, Glode LM, Gillman M, Miller RS (2012) Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract 8:173–178PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nason GJ, O’Kelly F, Kelly ME, Phelan N, Manecksha RP, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG (2015) The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals. BJU Int 115:486–490PubMedCrossRef Nason GJ, O’Kelly F, Kelly ME, Phelan N, Manecksha RP, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG (2015) The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals. BJU Int 115:486–490PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thangasamy IA, Leveridge M, Davies BJ, Finelli A, Stork B, Woo HH (2014) International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience. Eur Urol 66:112–117PubMedCrossRef Thangasamy IA, Leveridge M, Davies BJ, Finelli A, Stork B, Woo HH (2014) International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience. Eur Urol 66:112–117PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Katz MS, Utengen A, Anderson PF et al (2015) Disease-specific hashtags for online communication about cancer care. J Clin Oncol 3(suppl; abstr6520) Katz MS, Utengen A, Anderson PF et al (2015) Disease-specific hashtags for online communication about cancer care. J Clin Oncol 3(suppl; abstr6520)
15.
go back to reference Thangasamy IA, Leveridge M, Davies BJ, Finelli A, Stork B, Loeb S, Woo HH (2015) International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: a growing educational forum Presented at the Canadian Urological Association annual meeting, Ottawa, Canada, June 2015. Can Urol Assoc J 9(5–6Suppl2):S74 Thangasamy IA, Leveridge M, Davies BJ, Finelli A, Stork B, Loeb S, Woo HH (2015) International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: a growing educational forum Presented at the Canadian Urological Association annual meeting, Ottawa, Canada, June 2015. Can Urol Assoc J 9(5–6Suppl2):S74
18.
go back to reference Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE (2009) Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology 74:1058–1063PubMedCrossRef Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE (2009) Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology 74:1058–1063PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sugawara Y, Narimatsu H, Hozawa A, Shao L, Otani K, Fukao A (2012) Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media. BMC Res Notes 5:699PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sugawara Y, Narimatsu H, Hozawa A, Shao L, Otani K, Fukao A (2012) Cancer patients on Twitter: a novel patient community on social media. BMC Res Notes 5:699PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frandsen M, Walters J, Ferguson SG (2014) Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine Tob Res 16:247–251PubMedCrossRef Frandsen M, Walters J, Ferguson SG (2014) Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine Tob Res 16:247–251PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fenner Y, Garland SM, Moore EE, Jayasinghe Y, Fletcher A, Tabrizi SN, Gunasekaran B, Wark JD (2012) Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res 14(1):e20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fenner Y, Garland SM, Moore EE, Jayasinghe Y, Fletcher A, Tabrizi SN, Gunasekaran B, Wark JD (2012) Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res 14(1):e20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The state and potential of social media in bladder cancer
Author
Michael J. Leveridge
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1725-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

World Journal of Urology 1/2016 Go to the issue