Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8–10 prostatic adenocarcinoma

Authors: Naveen Pokala, Jerry J. Trulson, Majdee Islam

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Compared to low-grade disease, high-grade prostate cancers exhibit a higher rate of disease progression. As a result, there has been a trend to treat high-risk disease with methods other than surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term survival following radical prostatectomy (RRP) for non-metastatic Gleason 8–10 prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP).

Methods

All patients 75 years or less with Gleason 8–10 CaP that underwent RRP were identified from the SEER 18 database. Patients with metastatic disease, those who underwent other modalities of treatment, or with more than one primary cancer, were excluded. Data were analyzed for demographics, stage at presentation, treatment modality, and overall survival and cancer-specific survival.

Results

A total of 30,379 men met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62.5 years and 82.5 % of patients were white. A total of 52.8 % of patients had T2 disease, and 73.1 % had node-negative disease, 80.2 % of patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection, and 12.9 % underwent adjuvant radiation therapy. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 92.8, 78.6, 59.5, 38.6, and 20.0 % for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Cancer-specific survival was 96.4, 89.5, 82.0, 72.9, and 68.8 % for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively.

Conclusions

Although historically underutilized in patients with poorly differentiated disease, radical prostatectomy provides excellent long-term survival and should be offered to healthy patients.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G et al (1993) Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term follow-up. J Urol 150(1):135–141PubMed Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G et al (1993) Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term follow-up. J Urol 150(1):135–141PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sgrignoli AR, Walsh PC, Steinberg GD et al (1994) Prognostic factors in men with stage D1 prostate cancer: identification of patients less likely to have prolonged survival after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 152:1077–1081PubMed Sgrignoli AR, Walsh PC, Steinberg GD et al (1994) Prognostic factors in men with stage D1 prostate cancer: identification of patients less likely to have prolonged survival after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 152:1077–1081PubMed
4.
go back to reference Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Gleason DF et al (1998) Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:975PubMedCrossRef Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Gleason DF et al (1998) Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:975PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F et al (2002) Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167:528PubMedCrossRef Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F et al (2002) Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167:528PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sweat SD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak J, Blute ML, Zincke H (2002) Competing risk analysis after radical prostatectomy for clinically nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma according to clinical Gleason score and patient age. J Urol 168:525–529PubMedCrossRef Sweat SD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak J, Blute ML, Zincke H (2002) Competing risk analysis after radical prostatectomy for clinically nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma according to clinical Gleason score and patient age. J Urol 168:525–529PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Paulson DF, Piserchia PV, Gardner W (1980) Predictors of lymphatic spread in prostatic adenocarcinoma: uro-oncology research group study. J Urol 123:697PubMed Paulson DF, Piserchia PV, Gardner W (1980) Predictors of lymphatic spread in prostatic adenocarcinoma: uro-oncology research group study. J Urol 123:697PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sogani PC, Israel A, Lieberman PH et al (1985) Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a predictor of survival. Urology 25:223PubMedCrossRef Sogani PC, Israel A, Lieberman PH et al (1985) Gleason grading of prostate cancer: a predictor of survival. Urology 25:223PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meng MV, Elkin EP, Latini DM, Duchane J, Carroll PR (2005) Treatment of patients with high risk localized prostate cancer: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (CaPSURE). J Urol 173:1557–1561PubMedCrossRef Meng MV, Elkin EP, Latini DM, Duchane J, Carroll PR (2005) Treatment of patients with high risk localized prostate cancer: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (CaPSURE). J Urol 173:1557–1561PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Manoharan M, Bird VG, Kim SS, Civantos F, Soloway MS (2003) Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of ≥8. BJU Int 92:539–544PubMedCrossRef Manoharan M, Bird VG, Kim SS, Civantos F, Soloway MS (2003) Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of ≥8. BJU Int 92:539–544PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Sebo TJ et al (2009) The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 181:95–104PubMedCrossRef Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Sebo TJ et al (2009) The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 181:95–104PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Donohue J, Bianco F, Kuroiwa K et al (2006) Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading. J Urol 176(3):991–995PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Donohue J, Bianco F, Kuroiwa K et al (2006) Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading. J Urol 176(3):991–995PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S et al (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1708–1717PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S et al (2011) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1708–1717PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tewari A, Divine G, Chang P et al (2007) Long-term survival in men with high grade prostate cancer: a comparison between conservative treatment, radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy—a propensity scoring approach. J Urol 177(3):911–915PubMedCrossRef Tewari A, Divine G, Chang P et al (2007) Long-term survival in men with high grade prostate cancer: a comparison between conservative treatment, radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy—a propensity scoring approach. J Urol 177(3):911–915PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shao YH, Kim S, Moore D et al (2013) Cancer-specific survival after metastasis following primary radical prostatectomy compared with radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients: results of a population-based, propensity score–matched analysis. Eur Urol. Online 21 May 2013. ISSN 0302-2838. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.023 Shao YH, Kim S, Moore D et al (2013) Cancer-specific survival after metastasis following primary radical prostatectomy compared with radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients: results of a population-based, propensity score–matched analysis. Eur Urol. Online 21 May 2013. ISSN 0302-2838. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2013.​05.​023
16.
go back to reference Mian BM, Troncoso P, Okihara K et al (2002) Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone. J Urol 167:1675–1680PubMedCrossRef Mian BM, Troncoso P, Okihara K et al (2002) Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone. J Urol 167:1675–1680PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lughezzani G, Gallina A, Larcher A et al (2013) Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer. BJU Int 111(5):723–730PubMedCrossRef Lughezzani G, Gallina A, Larcher A et al (2013) Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer. BJU Int 111(5):723–730PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gerber GS, Thisted RA, Scardino PT et al (1996) Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 276:615PubMedCrossRef Gerber GS, Thisted RA, Scardino PT et al (1996) Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 276:615PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM et al (2000) Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 163:1171–1177PubMedCrossRef Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM et al (2000) Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 163:1171–1177PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Boorijan SA, Thompson RH, Siddiqui S et al (2007) Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 178(3):864–870CrossRef Boorijan SA, Thompson RH, Siddiqui S et al (2007) Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 178(3):864–870CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Brimo F, Partin AW, Epstein JI (2010) Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of prognosis. Urology 76(5):1206–1209PubMedCrossRef Brimo F, Partin AW, Epstein JI (2010) Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of prognosis. Urology 76(5):1206–1209PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pierorazio PM, Ross AE, Schaeffer EM et al (2011) A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185(5):1691–1697PubMedCrossRef Pierorazio PM, Ross AE, Schaeffer EM et al (2011) A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185(5):1691–1697PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hubanks M, Boorjian SA, Frank I et al (2013) The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes. Urol Oncol. Online 6 February 2013. ISSN 1078-1439. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.09.002 Hubanks M, Boorjian SA, Frank I et al (2013) The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes. Urol Oncol. Online 6 February 2013. ISSN 1078-1439. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urolonc.​2012.​09.​002
24.
go back to reference Lau WK, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML, Slezak JM, Zincke H (2002) Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables. J Urol 167:117PubMedCrossRef Lau WK, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML, Slezak JM, Zincke H (2002) Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables. J Urol 167:117PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schiavina R, Scattoni V, Castellucci P et al (2008) 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph-node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms. Eur Urol 54(2):392–401PubMedCrossRef Schiavina R, Scattoni V, Castellucci P et al (2008) 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph-node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms. Eur Urol 54(2):392–401PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cheng L, Zincke H, Blude M et al (2001) Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer 91(1):66–73PubMedCrossRef Cheng L, Zincke H, Blude M et al (2001) Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer 91(1):66–73PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Briganti A, Karnes J, Filippo Da Pozzo L et al (2009) Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol 55(2):261–270PubMedCrossRef Briganti A, Karnes J, Filippo Da Pozzo L et al (2009) Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol 55(2):261–270PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Daneshmand S, Quek M, Stein J et al (2004) Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long term results. J Urol 172(6):2252–2255PubMedCrossRef Daneshmand S, Quek M, Stein J et al (2004) Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long term results. J Urol 172(6):2252–2255PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8–10 prostatic adenocarcinoma
Authors
Naveen Pokala
Jerry J. Trulson
Majdee Islam
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1253-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

World Journal of Urology 6/2014 Go to the issue