Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 3/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery using a laparoendoscopic training box: the sandwich model

Authors: Stephan Jutzi, Florian Imkamp, Markus A. Kuczyk, Ute Walcher, Udo Nagele, Thomas R. W. Herrmann

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Percutaneous renal surgery (PRS) is a challenging procedure for urologic surgeons and requires a large variety of different skills. Our objective was to improve the preexisting porcine kidney-training model for percutaneous renal access and PRS.

Methods

For our biologic training model, we use porcine kidneys with preserved ureter. The ureter was dissected, stones were placed into the collecting system using a 16, 5F Amplatz sheath, and a 12Ch indwelling catheter was placed in the ureter for further irrigation with blue-dyed saline. The kidney was placed between two porcine full-thickness skin lobes in an existing laparoscopy trainer (SITUS Box). The kidney was punctured with ultrasound guidance, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) was then performed as previously described. The model was evaluated in MIP training courses, which are regularly held at the Hannover Medical School.

Results

All trainees were urologists with experience in endourologic surgery. Eleven participants were trained in this model. Percutaneous puncture under ultrasonographic guidance and following intrarenal surgery was successful in all 11 (100 %) cases. Therefore, all participants rated the model useful for simulating percutaneous renal surgery.

Conclusion

Compared to recently published models, this new porcine kidney model is easy to prepare and is cost-effective by using standard material. Moreover, it provides realistic and reproducible practice for PRS in the laboratory. Unfavorably, the described organ model requires an existing laparoscopy training system. Comprehensively, the presented organ model approximates the natural retroperitoneal circumstances precisely by using the two full-thickness skin flaps with the fatty subcutaneous tissue.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hesse A, Brandle E, Wilbert D, Kohrmann KU, Alken P (2003) Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 44:709–713PubMedCrossRef Hesse A, Brandle E, Wilbert D, Kohrmann KU, Alken P (2003) Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 44:709–713PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Michel M. S., Trojan L., Rassweiler J. J. (2007). Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51, 899–906; discussion 906 Michel M. S., Trojan L., Rassweiler J. J. (2007). Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51, 899–906; discussion 906
3.
go back to reference Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878PubMedCrossRef Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lahme S, Zimmermanns V, Hochmuth A, Janitzki V (2008) Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL? Urol A 47:563–568CrossRef Lahme S, Zimmermanns V, Hochmuth A, Janitzki V (2008) Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL? Urol A 47:563–568CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nagele U, Knoll T, Schilling D, Michel MS, Stenzl A (2008) Lower pole calyceal stones. Urol A 47:875–884CrossRef Nagele U, Knoll T, Schilling D, Michel MS, Stenzl A (2008) Lower pole calyceal stones. Urol A 47:875–884CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urol A 47(1066):1068–1073 Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urol A 47(1066):1068–1073
7.
go back to reference Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol 24:1075–1079PubMedCrossRef Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol 24:1075–1079PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptaft R, Glass J (2005) Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 19:279–282PubMedCrossRef Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptaft R, Glass J (2005) Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 19:279–282PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P (2008) Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy—a critical review. Eur Urol 54:994–1001PubMedCrossRef de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P (2008) Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy—a critical review. Eur Urol 54:994–1001PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C (2007) The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 52:206–211PubMedCrossRef Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C (2007) The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 52:206–211PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Imkamp F, von Klot C, Nagele U, Herrmann TR (2011) New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery. Int Br J Urol 37:388–394CrossRef Imkamp F, von Klot C, Nagele U, Herrmann TR (2011) New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery. Int Br J Urol 37:388–394CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Knudsen BE, Matsumoto ED, Chew BH, Johnson B, Margulis V, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS, Pautler SE, Denstedt JD (2006) A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I. J Urol 176:2173–2178PubMedCrossRef Knudsen BE, Matsumoto ED, Chew BH, Johnson B, Margulis V, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS, Pautler SE, Denstedt JD (2006) A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I. J Urol 176:2173–2178PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Earp PP (2003) Percutaneous renal surgery—new model for learning and training. Int Br J Urol 29:151–154CrossRef Earp PP (2003) Percutaneous renal surgery—new model for learning and training. Int Br J Urol 29:151–154CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hacker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T (2007) A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol 21:545–550PubMedCrossRef Hacker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T (2007) A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol 21:545–550PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF (2004) A new approach to urology training: a laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 172:1950–1952PubMedCrossRef Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF (2004) A new approach to urology training: a laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 172:1950–1952PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Qiu Z, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Sun YC (2011) Modified biological training model for percutaneous renal surgery with ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:1286–1289 Qiu Z, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Sun YC (2011) Modified biological training model for percutaneous renal surgery with ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:1286–1289
17.
go back to reference Strohmaier WL, Giese A (2005) Ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res 33:191–193PubMedCrossRef Strohmaier WL, Giese A (2005) Ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res 33:191–193PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Strohmaier WL, Giese A (2009) Improved ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res 37:107–110PubMedCrossRef Strohmaier WL, Giese A (2009) Improved ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res 37:107–110PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Ou TW, Jia JG, Gao W, Cui X, Wu JT, Wang G (2008) Novel biologic model for percutaneous renal surgery learning and training in the laboratory. Urology 72:513–516PubMedCrossRef Zhang Y, Ou TW, Jia JG, Gao W, Cui X, Wu JT, Wang G (2008) Novel biologic model for percutaneous renal surgery learning and training in the laboratory. Urology 72:513–516PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery using a laparoendoscopic training box: the sandwich model
Authors
Stephan Jutzi
Florian Imkamp
Markus A. Kuczyk
Ute Walcher
Udo Nagele
Thomas R. W. Herrmann
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1151-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

World Journal of Urology 3/2014 Go to the issue