Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 3/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Article

Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy

Authors: Jun-Hang Luo, Fang-Jian Zhou, Dan Xie, Zhi-Ling Zhang, Bing Liao, Hong-Wei Zhao, Yu-Ping Dai, Ling-Wu Chen, Wei Chen

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the impact of surgical approaches and clinico-pathological parameters on the prognosis of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) or open radical nephrectomy (ORN).

Methods

Between 2002 and 2008, 336 patients with localized RCC were treated at our two institutions. Of these, 261 were classified as clinical stage pT1 and 75 as pT2, the mean age was 52.3 years. One hundred forty-two patients underwent LRN, and 194 underwent ORN. The medical records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The mean follow-up was 44 months (12–84 months). The 3-, 5-, and 7-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of LRN group (96.3, 94.6, and 92.5%, respectively) were equivalent to ORN (97.4, 94.2, and 91.4%, respectively). The mean CSS rates were not significantly different between LRN and ORN groups for either pT1 (82.3 vs. 81.6 months, P = 0.713) or pT2 (69.0 vs. 72.1 months, P = 0.729). Univariate analysis demonstrated significant impact of tumor stage (pT1 vs. pT2, P = 0.002) and tumor grade (G1/2 vs. G3/4, P = 0.045) on CSS. Surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) was not a statistically significant factor on CSS. Multivariate analysis identified that tumor stage was an independent prognostic factor for CSS of localized RCC (P = 0.007).

Conclusions

Based on the long-term follow-up, our evaluation suggests that LRN is oncologically equivalent to ORN for patients with pT1 or pT2 tumors. Among the clinical variables, tumor stage appears to be an independent prognostic factor of CSS of localized RCC patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282PubMed
2.
go back to reference Cadeddu JA, Ono Y, Clayman RV et al (1998) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multicenter experience. Urology 52:773–777CrossRefPubMed Cadeddu JA, Ono Y, Clayman RV et al (1998) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multicenter experience. Urology 52:773–777CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S et al (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 45:483–488CrossRefPubMed Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S et al (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 45:483–488CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Goel A, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2002) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy and comparison with open surgery. World J Urol 20:219–223PubMed Goel A, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2002) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy and comparison with open surgery. World J Urol 20:219–223PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Kumar A, Gupta NP et al (2007) Oncologic outcome of 132 cases of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with intact specimen removal for T1–2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 25:619–626CrossRefPubMed Hemal AK, Kumar A, Gupta NP et al (2007) Oncologic outcome of 132 cases of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with intact specimen removal for T1–2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 25:619–626CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225CrossRefPubMed Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE et al (2005) Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 174:1222–1225CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Larré S, Kanso C, De La Taille A et al (2008) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: intermediate oncological results. World J Urol 26:611–615CrossRefPubMed Larré S, Kanso C, De La Taille A et al (2008) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: intermediate oncological results. World J Urol 26:611–615CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Jelovsek JE et al (2008) Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 71:1149–1154CrossRefPubMed Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Jelovsek JE et al (2008) Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 71:1149–1154CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al (1999) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 161:1776–1780CrossRefPubMed Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al (1999) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 161:1776–1780CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159CrossRefPubMed Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al (2002) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:1257–1262CrossRefPubMed Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J et al (2002) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 167:1257–1262CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Aron M et al (2007) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer. Clinics 62:251–256PubMed Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Aron M et al (2007) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer. Clinics 62:251–256PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177:862–866CrossRefPubMed Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177:862–866CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lam JS, Belldegrun AS, Pantuck AJ (2006) Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 24:255–266CrossRefPubMed Lam JS, Belldegrun AS, Pantuck AJ (2006) Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 24:255–266CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Medeiros LJ, Gelb AB, Weiss LM (1988) Renal cell carcinoma—prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases. Cancer 61:1639–1651CrossRefPubMed Medeiros LJ, Gelb AB, Weiss LM (1988) Renal cell carcinoma—prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases. Cancer 61:1639–1651CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, de Fromont M et al (1995) Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 76:2543–2549CrossRefPubMed Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, de Fromont M et al (1995) Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 76:2543–2549CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn edn. Wiley-Liss, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn edn. Wiley-Liss, New York
18.
go back to reference Wittekind Ch, Meyer HJ, Bootz F (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn edn. Springer, Berlin Wittekind Ch, Meyer HJ, Bootz F (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn edn. Springer, Berlin
19.
go back to reference Minervini R, Minervini A, Fontana N et al (2000) Evaluation of the 1997 tumor, nodes and metastases classification of renal cell carcinoma: experience in 172 patients. BJU Int 86:199–202CrossRefPubMed Minervini R, Minervini A, Fontana N et al (2000) Evaluation of the 1997 tumor, nodes and metastases classification of renal cell carcinoma: experience in 172 patients. BJU Int 86:199–202CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bedke J, Pritsch M, Buse S et al (2008) Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size. J Urol 180:62–67CrossRefPubMed Bedke J, Pritsch M, Buse S et al (2008) Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size. J Urol 180:62–67CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zorn KC, Gong EM, Orvieto MA et al (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: effects on long-term serum creatinine. Urology 69:1035–1040CrossRefPubMed Zorn KC, Gong EM, Orvieto MA et al (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: effects on long-term serum creatinine. Urology 69:1035–1040CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM et al (2008) Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 179:468–471CrossRefPubMed Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM et al (2008) Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 179:468–471CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy
Authors
Jun-Hang Luo
Fang-Jian Zhou
Dan Xie
Zhi-Ling Zhang
Bing Liao
Hong-Wei Zhao
Yu-Ping Dai
Ling-Wu Chen
Wei Chen
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0487-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

World Journal of Urology 3/2010 Go to the issue