Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 2/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Article

The bone-anchor sub-urethral sling for the treatment of iatrogenic male incontinence: subjective and objective assessment after 41 months of mean follow-up

Authors: Claudio Giberti, Fabrizio Gallo, Maurizio Schenone, Pierluigi Cortese

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate retrospectively the objective and subjective parameters in 42 male patients who underwent bone anchored sub-urethral sling positioning (BAUS) for SUI (stress urinary incontinence) due to ISD (intrinsic sphincter deficiency).

Methods

Patients with SUI due to radical retropubic prostatectomy (36 patients), transurethral resection of prostate (5 patients) and open simple prostatectomy (1 patient) underwent BAUS positioning between July 1999 and September 2005 (mean FU = 41 months). Before and after surgery, the patients were evaluated by physical examination, urethrocystoscopy, urodynamics, 1 h pad test and QoL questionnaire. Surgical technique involved perineal implantation to the pubic rami using four anchors of a sub-urethral sling made of synthetic (26 patients), biological (4 patients) or mixed (12 patients) material. Patients were stratified into three groups: (1) Cured: dry patients at stress test, pad weight 0–1 g. (2) Improved: patients with mild-moderate incontinence, pad weight 2–50 g. (3) Failed: unchanged patients, pad weight > 50 g.

Results

At the final follow-up visit cured, improved and failed patients were 26 (62%), 4 (8%) and 12 (30%), respectively. Mean pad weight significantly decreased from 104.6 to 47.3 g (55%) and mean total questionnaire score significantly increased to 50.7 (66%). Mean ALPP significantly increased to 50.4 cmH2O (44.8%). Better results were seen with synthetic slings. Main complications were perineal pain (76%), detrusor overactivity (12%) and sling infection (4.8%).

Conclusions

BAUS implantation is a safe, effective, minimally invasive option for iatrogenic male incontinence due to ISD. It compares favourably with AUS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Geary ES, Dendinger TE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1995) Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 45:1000–1006PubMedCrossRef Geary ES, Dendinger TE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1995) Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 45:1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalona WJ (2004) Potency, continence and complications in 3477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 172:2227–2231PubMedCrossRef Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalona WJ (2004) Potency, continence and complications in 3477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 172:2227–2231PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gomha MA, Boone TB (2003) Voiding patterns in patients with post prostatectomy incontinence: urodinamic and demographic analisys. J Urol 168:1766–1768CrossRef Gomha MA, Boone TB (2003) Voiding patterns in patients with post prostatectomy incontinence: urodinamic and demographic analisys. J Urol 168:1766–1768CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP (1998) Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 51:67–72PubMedCrossRef Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP (1998) Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 51:67–72PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Braslis KG, Petsch M, Lim A, Civantos F, Soloway MS (1995) Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 28:202–208PubMed Braslis KG, Petsch M, Lim A, Civantos F, Soloway MS (1995) Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 28:202–208PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cambio AJ, Evans CP (2006) Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50:903–913PubMedCrossRef Cambio AJ, Evans CP (2006) Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. Eur Urol 50:903–913PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55:58–60PubMedCrossRef Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55:58–60PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Leach GE, Brook RH (1995) Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 273:129–131PubMedCrossRef Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Leach GE, Brook RH (1995) Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 273:129–131PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Marzocco M, Tosto A, Nicita G (2005) Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 48:734–738PubMedCrossRef Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Marzocco M, Tosto A, Nicita G (2005) Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 48:734–738PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hunter KF, Moore KN, Cody DJ, Glazener CM (2004) Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:1843–1845 Hunter KF, Moore KN, Cody DJ, Glazener CM (2004) Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:1843–1845
11.
go back to reference Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Villari D, Marzocco M, Nicita G (2006) Pharmacologic treatment in postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 15:1850–1852 Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Villari D, Marzocco M, Nicita G (2006) Pharmacologic treatment in postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 15:1850–1852
12.
go back to reference Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Reich O, Schorsch I, Seitz M, Stief CG (2006) Preliminary results on the off-label use of duloxetine for the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. Eur Urol 49:1075–1078PubMedCrossRef Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Reich O, Schorsch I, Seitz M, Stief CG (2006) Preliminary results on the off-label use of duloxetine for the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. Eur Urol 49:1075–1078PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Clemens JQ, Schuster TG, Konnak JW, McGuire EG, Faerber GJ (2001) Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analisys. J Urol 166:1372–1374PubMedCrossRef Clemens JQ, Schuster TG, Konnak JW, McGuire EG, Faerber GJ (2001) Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analisys. J Urol 166:1372–1374PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schneider T, Sperling H, Rossi R (2005) Do early injections of bulking agents following radical prostatectomy improve early continence? World J Urol 23:338–342PubMedCrossRef Schneider T, Sperling H, Rossi R (2005) Do early injections of bulking agents following radical prostatectomy improve early continence? World J Urol 23:338–342PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Madjar S, Raz S, Gousse AE (2001) Fixed and dynamic urethral compression for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: is history repeating itself? J Urol 166:411–415PubMedCrossRef Madjar S, Raz S, Gousse AE (2001) Fixed and dynamic urethral compression for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: is history repeating itself? J Urol 166:411–415PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ullrich NFE, Comiter CV (2004) The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: 24-months follow-up with questionnaire based assessment. J Urol 172:207–209PubMedCrossRef Ullrich NFE, Comiter CV (2004) The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: 24-months follow-up with questionnaire based assessment. J Urol 172:207–209PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Madjar S, Jacoby K, Giberti C, Wald M, Halachmi S, Issaq E, Moskovitz B, Beyar M, Nativ O (2001) Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 165:72–76PubMedCrossRef Madjar S, Jacoby K, Giberti C, Wald M, Halachmi S, Issaq E, Moskovitz B, Beyar M, Nativ O (2001) Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 165:72–76PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG (1996) Quality of life in persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 47:67–72PubMedCrossRef Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG (1996) Quality of life in persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 47:67–72PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Agresti A (ed) (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 59–66 Agresti A (ed) (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 59–66
21.
go back to reference Grise P, Thurman S (2002) Urinary incontinence following treatment of localized prostate cancer. Cancer Control 8:532–539 Grise P, Thurman S (2002) Urinary incontinence following treatment of localized prostate cancer. Cancer Control 8:532–539
22.
go back to reference Bosch JL, Klijn AJ, Schroder FH, Hop WC (2000) The artificial urinary sphincter in 86 patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: satisfactory actuarial adequate function rates. Eur Urol 38:156–160PubMedCrossRef Bosch JL, Klijn AJ, Schroder FH, Hop WC (2000) The artificial urinary sphincter in 86 patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: satisfactory actuarial adequate function rates. Eur Urol 38:156–160PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long term subjective results. J Urol 166:1755–1757PubMedCrossRef Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long term subjective results. J Urol 166:1755–1757PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cespedes RD (2000) Collagen injection of artificial sphincter for postprostatectomy incontinence: collagen. Urology 55:5–6PubMedCrossRef Cespedes RD (2000) Collagen injection of artificial sphincter for postprostatectomy incontinence: collagen. Urology 55:5–6PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mizuo T, Tanizawa A, Yamada T, Ando M, Oshima H (1992) Sling operation for male stress incontinence by utilizing modified Stamey technique. Urology 39:211–214PubMedCrossRef Mizuo T, Tanizawa A, Yamada T, Ando M, Oshima H (1992) Sling operation for male stress incontinence by utilizing modified Stamey technique. Urology 39:211–214PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stern JA, Clemens JQ, Tiplitsky SI, Matschke HM, Jain PM, Schaeffer AJ (2005) Long term results of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol 173:1654–1656PubMedCrossRef Stern JA, Clemens JQ, Tiplitsky SI, Matschke HM, Jain PM, Schaeffer AJ (2005) Long term results of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol 173:1654–1656PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Comiter CV (2005) The male perineal sling: intermidiate-term results. Neurourol Urodyn 24:648–653PubMedCrossRef Comiter CV (2005) The male perineal sling: intermidiate-term results. Neurourol Urodyn 24:648–653PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Clemens JQ, Bushman W, Schaeffer AJ (1999) Urodynamic analysis of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol 162:1977–82PubMedCrossRef Clemens JQ, Bushman W, Schaeffer AJ (1999) Urodynamic analysis of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol 162:1977–82PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dikranian AH, Chang JH, Rhee EY, Aboseif SR (2004) The male perineal sling: comparison of sling materials. J Urol 172:608–610PubMedCrossRef Dikranian AH, Chang JH, Rhee EY, Aboseif SR (2004) The male perineal sling: comparison of sling materials. J Urol 172:608–610PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The bone-anchor sub-urethral sling for the treatment of iatrogenic male incontinence: subjective and objective assessment after 41 months of mean follow-up
Authors
Claudio Giberti
Fabrizio Gallo
Maurizio Schenone
Pierluigi Cortese
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0222-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

World Journal of Urology 2/2008 Go to the issue