Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2022

15-06-2022 | Kidney Cancer | Urogenital

Nyquist sampling theorem and Bosniak classification, version 2019: effect of thin axial sections on categorization and agreement

Authors: Justin R. Tse, Luyao Shen, Jody Shen, Luke Yoon, Aya Kamaya

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine if CT axial images reconstructed at current standard of care (SOC; 2.5–3 mm) or thin (≤ 1 mm) sections affect categorization and inter-rater agreement of cystic renal masses assessed with Bosniak classification, version 2019.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center study, 3 abdominal radiologists reviewed 131 consecutive cystic renal masses from 100 patients performed with CT renal mass protocol from 2015 to 2021. Images were reviewed in two sessions: first with SOC and then the addition of thin sections. Individual and overall categorizations are reported, latter of which is based on majority opinion with 3-way discrepancies resolved by a fourth reader. Major categorization changes were defined as differences between classes I–II, IIF, or III–IV.

Results

Thin sections led to a statistically significant major category change with class II for all readers individually (p = 0.004–0.041; McNemar test), upgrading 10–17% of class II masses, most commonly to class IIF followed by III. Modal reason for upgrades was due to identification of additional septa followed by larger measurement of enhancing features. Masses categorized as class I, III, or IV on SOC sections were unaffected, as were identification of protrusions. Inter-rater agreements using weighted Cohen’s kappa were 0.679 for SOC and 0.691 for thin sections (both substantial).

Conclusion

Thin axial sections upgraded up to one in six class II masses to IIF or III through identification of additional septa or larger feature. Other classes, including III–IV, were unaffected. Inter-rater agreements were substantial regardless of section thickness.

Key Points

• Thin axial sections (≤ 1 mm) compared to standard of care sections (2.5–3 mm) led to identification of additional septa but did not affect identification of protrusions.
• Thin axial sections (≤ 1 mm) compared to standard of care sections (2.5–3 mm) can upgrade a small proportion of cystic renal masses from class II to IIF or III when applying Bosniak classification, version 2019.
• Inter-rater agreements were substantial regardless of section thickness.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Bosniak MA (1997) The use of Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. J Urol 5(157):1852–1853CrossRef Bosniak MA (1997) The use of Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. J Urol 5(157):1852–1853CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen PCMS (2017) Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol 198(1):12–21CrossRefPubMed Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen PCMS (2017) Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol 198(1):12–21CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part I. J Urol 206(2):199–208CrossRefPubMed Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part I. J Urol 206(2):199–208CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part II. J Urol 206(2):209–218CrossRefPubMed Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: Part II. J Urol 206(2):209–218CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Pedrosa IP, Ellis JH et al (2019) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: an update proposal and needs assessment. Radiology 292(2):475–488CrossRefPubMed Silverman SG, Pedrosa IP, Ellis JH et al (2019) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: an update proposal and needs assessment. Radiology 292(2):475–488CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Shannon CE (1998) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc IEEE 86(2):447–457CrossRef Shannon CE (1998) Communication in the presence of noise. Proc IEEE 86(2):447–457CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6(7):655–663CrossRefPubMed Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6(7):655–663CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zigeuner R, Hutterer G, Chromecki T et al (2010) External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57(1):102–109CrossRefPubMed Zigeuner R, Hutterer G, Chromecki T et al (2010) External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57(1):102–109CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beddy P, Genega EM, Ngo L (2014) Tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging correlates with aggressive histology and disease progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 12:55–62CrossRefPubMed Beddy P, Genega EM, Ngo L (2014) Tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging correlates with aggressive histology and disease progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 12:55–62CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tse JR, Shen L, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2021) Prevalence of malignancy and histopathologic association of Bosniak classification, version 2019 class III and IV cystic renal masses. J Urol 205(4):1031–1038CrossRefPubMed Tse JR, Shen L, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2021) Prevalence of malignancy and histopathologic association of Bosniak classification, version 2019 class III and IV cystic renal masses. J Urol 205(4):1031–1038CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Parker WP, Cheville JC, Frank I et al (2017) Application of the stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contemporary patients. Eur Urol 71(4):665–673CrossRefPubMed Parker WP, Cheville JC, Frank I et al (2017) Application of the stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contemporary patients. Eur Urol 71(4):665–673CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK (2000) Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(3):39–342 Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK (2000) Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(3):39–342
15.
go back to reference Bosniak MA (1997) Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:819–821CrossRefPubMed Bosniak MA (1997) Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:819–821CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371CrossRefPubMed Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA (2004) Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 231:365–371CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rankin SC, Webb JA, Reznek RH (2000) Spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of renal masses. BJU Int 86:48–57CrossRefPubMed Rankin SC, Webb JA, Reznek RH (2000) Spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of renal masses. BJU Int 86:48–57CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:813–818CrossRefPubMed Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP (1997) CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:813–818CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bertolotto M, Zappetti R, Cavallaro M, Perrone R, Perretti L, Cova MA (2010) Characterization of atypical cystic renal masses with MDCT: comparison of 5-mm axial images and thin multiplanar reconstructed images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:693–700CrossRefPubMed Bertolotto M, Zappetti R, Cavallaro M, Perrone R, Perretti L, Cova MA (2010) Characterization of atypical cystic renal masses with MDCT: comparison of 5-mm axial images and thin multiplanar reconstructed images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:693–700CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Yan JH, Chan J, Osman H et al (2021) Bosniak classification version 2019: validation and comparison to original classification in pathologically confirmed cystic masses. Eur Radiol 31(12):9579–9587CrossRefPubMed Yan JH, Chan J, Osman H et al (2021) Bosniak classification version 2019: validation and comparison to original classification in pathologically confirmed cystic masses. Eur Radiol 31(12):9579–9587CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tse JR, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2020) Bosniak classification version 2019 of cystic renal masses assessed with MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 215:413–419CrossRefPubMed Tse JR, Shen J, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2020) Bosniak classification version 2019 of cystic renal masses assessed with MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 215:413–419CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bai X, Sun SM, Xu W et al (2020) MRI-based Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: interobserver agreement, impact of readers’ experience, and diagnostic performance. Radiology 297(3):597–605CrossRefPubMed Bai X, Sun SM, Xu W et al (2020) MRI-based Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: interobserver agreement, impact of readers’ experience, and diagnostic performance. Radiology 297(3):597–605CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chan J, Yan JH, Munir J et al (2021) Comparison of Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019 assessed by CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:5268–6276 Chan J, Yan JH, Munir J et al (2021) Comparison of Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019 assessed by CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:5268–6276
24.
go back to reference Tse JR, Shen J, Shen L, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2021) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019: comparison of categorization using CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 216:412–420CrossRefPubMed Tse JR, Shen J, Shen L, Yoon L, Kamaya A (2021) Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019: comparison of categorization using CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 216:412–420CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Nyquist sampling theorem and Bosniak classification, version 2019: effect of thin axial sections on categorization and agreement
Authors
Justin R. Tse
Luyao Shen
Jody Shen
Luke Yoon
Aya Kamaya
Publication date
15-06-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08876-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2022

European Radiology 12/2022 Go to the issue