Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2021

Open Access 01-08-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Musculoskeletal

Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study

Authors: Markus M. Schreiner, Marcus Raudner, Sebastian Röhrich, Martin Zalaudek, Michael Weber, Georg Kaiser, Silke Aldrian, Catharina Chiari, Reinhard Windhager, Siegfried Trattnig

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the reliability of the MOCART 2.0 knee score in the radiological assessment of repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures.

Methods

A total of 114 patients (34 females) who underwent cartilage repair of a femoral cartilage lesion with at least one postoperative MRI examination were selected, and one random postoperative MRI examination was retrospectively included. Mean age was 32.5 ± 9.6 years at time of surgery. Overall, 66 chondral and 48 osteochondral lesions were included in the study. Forty-eight patients were treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), 27 via osteochondral autologous transplantation, five using an osteochondral scaffold, and 34 underwent microfracture (MFX). The original MOCART and MOCART 2.0 knee scores were assessed by two independent readers. After a minimum 4-week interval, both readers performed a second reading of both scores. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

The MOCART 2.0 knee score showed higher interrater reliability than the original MOCART score with an ICC of 0.875 versus 0.759, ranging from 0.863 in the MFX group to 0.878 in the ACI group. Intrarater reliability was good with an overall ICC of 0.860 and 0.866, respectively. Overall, interrater reliability was higher for osteochondral lesions than for chondral lesions, with ICCs of 0.906 versus 0.786.

Conclusions

The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX), as well as for different lesion types with good intra- and interrater reliability.

Key Points

The MOCART 2.0 knee score provides improved intra- and interrater reliability when compared to the original MOCART score.
The MOCART 2.0 knee score enables the assessment of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair techniques (ACI, osteochondral repair techniques, MFX) with similarly good intra- and interrater reliability.
The assessment of osteochondral lesions demonstrated better intra- and interrater reliability than the assessment of chondral lesions in this study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460CrossRef Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aroen A, Loken S, Heir S et al (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32:211–215CrossRef Aroen A, Loken S, Heir S et al (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32:211–215CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bay-Jensen AC, Hoegh-Madsen S, Dam E et al (2010) Which elements are involved in reversible and irreversible cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis? Rheumatol Int 30:435–442CrossRef Bay-Jensen AC, Hoegh-Madsen S, Dam E et al (2010) Which elements are involved in reversible and irreversible cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis? Rheumatol Int 30:435–442CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Wang Y et al (2008) The natural history of cartilage defects in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:337–342CrossRef Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Wang Y et al (2008) The natural history of cartilage defects in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:337–342CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Muller B, Kohn D (1999) Indication for and performance of articular cartilage drilling using the Pridie method. Orthopade 28:4–10PubMed Muller B, Kohn D (1999) Indication for and performance of articular cartilage drilling using the Pridie method. Orthopade 28:4–10PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kish G, Modis L, Hangody L (1999) Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Rationale, indications, techniques, and results. Clin Sports Med 18:45–66 viCrossRef Kish G, Modis L, Hangody L (1999) Osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee and talus in the athlete. Rationale, indications, techniques, and results. Clin Sports Med 18:45–66 viCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G et al (2010) A novel nano-composite multi-layered biomaterial for treatment of osteochondral lesions: technique note and an early stability pilot clinical trial. Injury 41:693–701CrossRef Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G et al (2010) A novel nano-composite multi-layered biomaterial for treatment of osteochondral lesions: technique note and an early stability pilot clinical trial. Injury 41:693–701CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brix M, Kaipel M, Kellner R et al (2016) Successful osteoconduction but limited cartilage tissue quality following osteochondral repair by a cell-free multilayered nano-composite scaffold at the knee. Int Orthop 40:625–632CrossRef Brix M, Kaipel M, Kellner R et al (2016) Successful osteoconduction but limited cartilage tissue quality following osteochondral repair by a cell-free multilayered nano-composite scaffold at the knee. Int Orthop 40:625–632CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895CrossRef Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69CrossRef Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):58–69CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Blackman AJ, Smith MV, Flanigan DC, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Brophy RH (2013) Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41:1426–1434CrossRef Blackman AJ, Smith MV, Flanigan DC, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Brophy RH (2013) Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41:1426–1434CrossRef
14.
go back to reference de Windt TS, Welsch GH, Brittberg M et al (2013) Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41:1695–1702CrossRef de Windt TS, Welsch GH, Brittberg M et al (2013) Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41:1695–1702CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ebert JR, Smith A, Fallon M, Wood DJ, Ackland TR (2014) Correlation between clinical and radiological outcomes after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the femoral condyles. Am J Sports Med 42:1857–1864CrossRef Ebert JR, Smith A, Fallon M, Wood DJ, Ackland TR (2014) Correlation between clinical and radiological outcomes after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the femoral condyles. Am J Sports Med 42:1857–1864CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Marlovits S, Singer P, Zeller P, Mandl I, Haller J, Trattnig S (2006) Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol 57:16–23CrossRef Marlovits S, Singer P, Zeller P, Mandl I, Haller J, Trattnig S (2006) Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol 57:16–23CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stone KR, Pelsis JR, Crues JV 3rd, Walgenbach AW, Turek TJ (2014) Osteochondral grafting for failed knee osteochondritis dissecans repairs. Knee 21:1145–1150CrossRef Stone KR, Pelsis JR, Crues JV 3rd, Walgenbach AW, Turek TJ (2014) Osteochondral grafting for failed knee osteochondritis dissecans repairs. Knee 21:1145–1150CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ebert JR, Schneider A, Fallon M, Wood DJ, Janes GC (2017) A comparison of 2-year outcomes in patients undergoing tibiofemoral or patellofemoral matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sports Med 45:3243–3253CrossRef Ebert JR, Schneider A, Fallon M, Wood DJ, Janes GC (2017) A comparison of 2-year outcomes in patients undergoing tibiofemoral or patellofemoral matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sports Med 45:3243–3253CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:2053–2063CrossRef Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:2053–2063CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zbyn S, Stelzeneder D, Welsch GH et al (2012) Evaluation of native hyaline cartilage and repair tissue after two cartilage repair surgery techniques with 23Na MR imaging at 7 T: initial experience. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20:837–845CrossRef Zbyn S, Stelzeneder D, Welsch GH et al (2012) Evaluation of native hyaline cartilage and repair tissue after two cartilage repair surgery techniques with 23Na MR imaging at 7 T: initial experience. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20:837–845CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olivos Meza A, Cortes Gonzalez S, Ferniza Garza JJ, Perez Jimenez FJ, Enrique VC, Ibarra C (2019) Arthroscopic treatment of patellar and trochlear cartilage lesions with matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture: quantitative assessment with MRI T2-mapping and MOCART at 4-year follow-up. Cartilage. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603519835909:1947603519835909 Olivos Meza A, Cortes Gonzalez S, Ferniza Garza JJ, Perez Jimenez FJ, Enrique VC, Ibarra C (2019) Arthroscopic treatment of patellar and trochlear cartilage lesions with matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture: quantitative assessment with MRI T2-mapping and MOCART at 4-year follow-up. Cartilage. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1947603519835909​:​1947603519835909​
23.
go back to reference Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK (2002) Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. J Knee Surg 15:170–176PubMed Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK (2002) Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. J Knee Surg 15:170–176PubMed
24.
go back to reference Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Alizai H et al (2015) State of the art: MR imaging after knee cartilage repair surgery. Radiology 277:23–43CrossRef Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Alizai H et al (2015) State of the art: MR imaging after knee cartilage repair surgery. Radiology 277:23–43CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163CrossRef Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Albano D, Martinelli N, Bianchi A, Giacalone A, Sconfienza LM (2017) Evaluation of reproducibility of the MOCART score in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus repaired using the autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis technique. Radiol Med 122:909–917CrossRef Albano D, Martinelli N, Bianchi A, Giacalone A, Sconfienza LM (2017) Evaluation of reproducibility of the MOCART score in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus repaired using the autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis technique. Radiol Med 122:909–917CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Niemeyer P, Albrecht D, Andereya S et al (2016) Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for cartilage defects of the knee: a guideline by the working group “Clinical Tissue Regeneration” of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Knee 23:426–435CrossRef Niemeyer P, Albrecht D, Andereya S et al (2016) Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for cartilage defects of the knee: a guideline by the working group “Clinical Tissue Regeneration” of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Knee 23:426–435CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques—a retrospective observational study
Authors
Markus M. Schreiner
Marcus Raudner
Sebastian Röhrich
Martin Zalaudek
Michael Weber
Georg Kaiser
Silke Aldrian
Catharina Chiari
Reinhard Windhager
Siegfried Trattnig
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07688-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

European Radiology 8/2021 Go to the issue