Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2021

Open Access 01-03-2021 | Breast Cancer | Breast

Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence

Authors: Kristina Lång, Magnus Dustler, Victor Dahlblom, Anna Åkesson, Ingvar Andersson, Sophia Zackrisson

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to identify normal mammograms in a screening population.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 9581 double-read mammography screening exams including 68 screen-detected cancers and 187 false positives, a subcohort of the prospective population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, were analysed with a deep learning–based AI system. The AI system categorises mammograms with a cancer risk score increasing from 1 to 10. The effect on cancer detection and false positives of excluding mammograms below different AI risk thresholds from reading by radiologists was investigated. A panel of three breast radiologists assessed the radiographic appearance, type, and visibility of screen-detected cancers assigned low-risk scores (≤ 5). The reduction of normal exams, cancers, and false positives for the different thresholds was presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

If mammograms scored 1 and 2 were excluded from screen-reading, 1829 (19.1%; 95% CI 18.3–19.9) exams could be removed, including 10 (5.3%; 95% CI 2.1–8.6) false positives but no cancers. In total, 5082 (53.0%; 95% CI 52.0–54.0) exams, including 7 (10.3%; 95% CI 3.1–17.5) cancers and 52 (27.8%; 95% CI 21.4–34.2) false positives, had low-risk scores. All, except one, of the seven screen-detected cancers with low-risk scores were judged to be clearly visible.

Conclusions

The evaluated AI system can correctly identify a proportion of a screening population as cancer-free and also reduce false positives. Thus, AI has the potential to improve mammography screening efficiency.

Key Points

• Retrospective study showed that AI can identify a proportion of mammograms as normal in a screening population.
• Excluding normal exams from screening using AI can reduce false positives.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C et al (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis Fourth Edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C et al (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis Fourth Edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
14.
go back to reference Mordang J-J, Janssen T, Bria A, Kooi T, Gubern-Mérida A, Karssemeijer N (2016) Automatic microcalcification detection in multi-vendor mammography using convolutional neural networks. In: Tingberg A, Lång K, Timberg P (eds) Breast imaging. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 35–42CrossRef Mordang J-J, Janssen T, Bria A, Kooi T, Gubern-Mérida A, Karssemeijer N (2016) Automatic microcalcification detection in multi-vendor mammography using convolutional neural networks. In: Tingberg A, Lång K, Timberg P (eds) Breast imaging. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 35–42CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Karssemeijer N (1998) Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys Med Biol 43:365CrossRef Karssemeijer N (1998) Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys Med Biol 43:365CrossRef
21.
go back to reference D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (2013) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (2013) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
Metadata
Title
Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence
Authors
Kristina Lång
Magnus Dustler
Victor Dahlblom
Anna Åkesson
Ingvar Andersson
Sophia Zackrisson
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07165-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

European Radiology 3/2021 Go to the issue