Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Magnetic Resonance

MRI in acute muscle tears in athletes: can quantitative T2 and DTI predict return to play better than visual assessment?

Authors: J. D. Biglands, A. J. Grainger, P. Robinson, S. F. Tanner, A. L. Tan, T. Feiweier, R. Evans, P. Emery, P. O’Connor

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the ability of quantitative T2, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and radiologist’s scores to detect muscle changes following acute muscle tear in soccer and rugby players. To assess the ability of these parameters to predict return to play times.

Methods

In this prospective, longitudinal study, 13 male athletes (age 19 to 34 years; mean 25 years) underwent MRI within 1 week of suffering acute muscle tear. Imaging included measurements of T2 and DTI parameters. Images were also assessed using modified Peetrons and British athletics muscle injury classification (BAMIC) scores. Participants returned for a second scan within 1 week of being determined fit to return to play. MRI measurements were compared between visits. Pearson’s correlation between visit 1 measurements and return to play times was assessed.

Results

There were significant differences between visits in BAMIC scores (Z = − 2.088; p = 0.037), modified Peetrons (Z = − 2.530; p = 0.011) and quantitative MRI measurements; T2, 13.12 ms (95% CI, 4.82 ms, 21.42 ms; p = 0.01); mean diffusivity (0.22 (0.04, 0.39); p = 0.02) and fractional anisotropy (0.07 (0.01, 0.14); p = 0.03). BAMIC scores showed a significant correlation with return to play time (Rs = 0.64; p = 0.02), but modified Peetrons scores and quantitative parameters did not.

Conclusions

T2 and DTI measurements in muscle can detect changes due to healing following muscle tear. Although BAMIC scores correlated well with return to play times, in this small study, quantitative MRI values did not, suggesting that T2 and DTI measurements are inferior predictors of return to play time compared with visual scoring.

Key Points

Muscle changes following acute muscle tear can be measured using T2 and diffusion measurements on MRI.
Measurements of T2 and diffusion using MRI are not as good as a radiologist’s visual report at predicting return to play time after acute muscle tear.
Literature
13.
go back to reference Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, Tol JL, Whiteley R (2016) A combination of initial and follow-up physiotherapist examination predicts physician-determined time to return to play after hamstring injury, with no added value of MRI. Br J Sports Med 50:431–439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095073 Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, Tol JL, Whiteley R (2016) A combination of initial and follow-up physiotherapist examination predicts physician-determined time to return to play after hamstring injury, with no added value of MRI. Br J Sports Med 50:431–439. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bjsports-2015-095073
26.
go back to reference Ibáñez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J (2005) The ITK software guide, second. Kitware, Inc., New York Ibáñez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J (2005) The ITK software guide, second. Kitware, Inc., New York
27.
go back to reference Mattes D, Haynor DR, Vesselle H, Lewellyn TK, Eubank W (2001) Nonrigid multimodality image registration. In: Sonka M, Hanson KM (eds) SPIE medical imaging. SPIE, pp 1609–1620 Mattes D, Haynor DR, Vesselle H, Lewellyn TK, Eubank W (2001) Nonrigid multimodality image registration. In: Sonka M, Hanson KM (eds) SPIE medical imaging. SPIE, pp 1609–1620
Metadata
Title
MRI in acute muscle tears in athletes: can quantitative T2 and DTI predict return to play better than visual assessment?
Authors
J. D. Biglands
A. J. Grainger
P. Robinson
S. F. Tanner
A. L. Tan
T. Feiweier
R. Evans
P. Emery
P. O’Connor
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06999-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

European Radiology 12/2020 Go to the issue