Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Cardiac

Influence of contrast agent and spatial resolution on myocardial strain results using feature tracking MRI

Authors: Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Tobias Schunke, Stephanie Reiter, Roland Scheck, Berthold Höfling, Günter Pilz

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Feature tracking for assessing myocardial strain from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images detects myocardial deformation abnormalities with prognostic implication, e.g., in myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy. Standards for image acquisition and processing are not yet available. Study aim was analyzing the influence of spatial resolution and contrast agent on myocardial strain results.

Methods

Seventy-five patients underwent CMR for analyzing peak systolic circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strain. Group A included n = 50 with normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no wall motion abnormality, and no fibrosis on late enhancement imaging. Group B included n = 25 with chronic myocardial infarct. For feature tracking, steady-state free precession cine images were acquired repeatedly. (1) Native standard cine (spatial resolution 1.4 × 1.4 × 8 mm3). (2) Native cine with lower spatial resolution (2.0 × 2.0 × 8 mm3). (3) Cine equal to variant 1 acquired after administration of gadoteracid.

Results

Lower spatial resolution was associated with elevated longitudinal strain (− 21.7% vs. − 19.8%; p < 0.001) in viable myocardium in group A, and with elevated longitudinal (− 17.0% vs. − 14.3%; p = 0.001), circumferential (− 18.6% vs. − 14.6%; p = 0.002), and radial strain (36.8% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.013) in infarcted myocardium in group B. Gadolinium administration was associated with reduced circumferential (− 21.4% vs. − 22.3%; p = 0.001) and radial strain (44.4% vs. 46.9%; p = 0.016) in group A, whereas strain results of the infarcted tissue in group B did not change after contrast agent administration.

Conclusions

Variations in spatial resolution and the administration of contrast agent may influence myocardial strain results in viable and partly in infarcted myocardium. Standardized image acquisition seems important for CMR feature tracking.

Key Points

• Feature tracking is used for calculating myocardial strain from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images.
• This prospective study demonstrated that CMR strain results may be influenced by spatial resolution and by the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent.
• The results underline the need for standardized image acquisition for CMR strain analysis, with constant imaging parameters and without contrast agent.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M et al (2013) European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry--multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:9CrossRef Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M et al (2013) European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry--multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:9CrossRef
2.
go back to reference von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Pilz G, Schulz-Menger J (2017) Representation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the AHA / ACC guidelines. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:70CrossRef von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Pilz G, Schulz-Menger J (2017) Representation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the AHA / ACC guidelines. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:70CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pedrizzetti G, Claus P, Kilner PJ, Nagel E (2016) Principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and echocardiographic speckle tracking for informed clinical use. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:51CrossRef Pedrizzetti G, Claus P, Kilner PJ, Nagel E (2016) Principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and echocardiographic speckle tracking for informed clinical use. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:51CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schuster A, Hor KN, Kowallick JT, Beerbaum P, Kutty S (2016) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: concepts and clinical applications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:e004077CrossRef Schuster A, Hor KN, Kowallick JT, Beerbaum P, Kutty S (2016) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: concepts and clinical applications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:e004077CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bistoquet A, Oshinski J, Skrinjar O (2007) Left ventricular deformation recovery from cine MRI using an incompressible model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:1136–1153CrossRef Bistoquet A, Oshinski J, Skrinjar O (2007) Left ventricular deformation recovery from cine MRI using an incompressible model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:1136–1153CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bistoquet A, Oshinski J, Skrinjar O (2008) Myocardial deformation recovery from cine MRI using a nearly incompressible biventricular model. Med Image Anal 12:69–85CrossRef Bistoquet A, Oshinski J, Skrinjar O (2008) Myocardial deformation recovery from cine MRI using a nearly incompressible biventricular model. Med Image Anal 12:69–85CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Almutairi HM, Boubertakh R, Miquel ME, Petersen SE (2017) Myocardial deformation assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking technique. Br J Radiol 90:20170072CrossRef Almutairi HM, Boubertakh R, Miquel ME, Petersen SE (2017) Myocardial deformation assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking technique. Br J Radiol 90:20170072CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C et al (2010) Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:144–151CrossRef Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C et al (2010) Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:144–151CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wu L, Germans T, Guclu A, Heymans MW, Allaart CP, van Rossum AC (2014) Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16:10CrossRef Wu L, Germans T, Guclu A, Heymans MW, Allaart CP, van Rossum AC (2014) Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16:10CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cao JJ, Ngai N, Duncanson L, Cheng J, Gliganic K, Chen Q (2018) A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:26CrossRef Cao JJ, Ngai N, Duncanson L, Cheng J, Gliganic K, Chen Q (2018) A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:26CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Buss SJ, Breuninger K, Lehrke S et al (2015) Assessment of myocardial deformation with cardiac magnetic resonance strain imaging improves risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:307–315CrossRef Buss SJ, Breuninger K, Lehrke S et al (2015) Assessment of myocardial deformation with cardiac magnetic resonance strain imaging improves risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:307–315CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Andre F, Steen H, Matheis P et al (2015) Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:25CrossRef Andre F, Steen H, Matheis P et al (2015) Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:25CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Backhaus SJ, Metschies G, Billing M et al (2019) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility. PLoS One 14:e0210127CrossRef Backhaus SJ, Metschies G, Billing M et al (2019) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility. PLoS One 14:e0210127CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gertz RJ, Lange T, Kowallick JT et al (2018) Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking. PLoS One 13:e0193746CrossRef Gertz RJ, Lange T, Kowallick JT et al (2018) Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking. PLoS One 13:e0193746CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dobrovie M, Barreiro-Perez M, Curione D et al (2019) Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking. Eur Radiol 29:6846–6857CrossRef Dobrovie M, Barreiro-Perez M, Curione D et al (2019) Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking. Eur Radiol 29:6846–6857CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:35CrossRef Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:35CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2020) Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:19CrossRef Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2020) Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:19CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim RJ, Simonetti OP, Westwood M et al (2018) Guidelines for training in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:57CrossRef Kim RJ, Simonetti OP, Westwood M et al (2018) Guidelines for training in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:57CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Force on Standardized Protocols (2013) Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:91 Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Force on Standardized Protocols (2013) Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:91
21.
go back to reference Truong VT, Safdar KS, Kalra DK et al (2017) Cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in right ventricle: feasibility and normal values. Magn Reson Imaging 38:189–195CrossRef Truong VT, Safdar KS, Kalra DK et al (2017) Cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in right ventricle: feasibility and normal values. Magn Reson Imaging 38:189–195CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542CrossRef Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–270CrossRef Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–270CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM et al (2017) Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:75CrossRef Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM et al (2017) Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:75CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, Smiseth OA (2002) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans: validation against three-dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106:50–56CrossRef Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, Smiseth OA (2002) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans: validation against three-dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106:50–56CrossRef
26.
go back to reference von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Hennig P, Menza M et al (2016) Myocardial dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and hypertensive heart disease assessed by MR tissue phase mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:168–177CrossRef von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Hennig P, Menza M et al (2016) Myocardial dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and hypertensive heart disease assessed by MR tissue phase mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 44:168–177CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Barron J, Fleet D, Beauchemin S (1994) Performance of optical flow techniques. Int J Comput Vis 12:43–77CrossRef Barron J, Fleet D, Beauchemin S (1994) Performance of optical flow techniques. Int J Comput Vis 12:43–77CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP et al (2019) Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med 380:2418–2428CrossRef Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP et al (2019) Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med 380:2418–2428CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Moschetti K, Petersen SE, Pilz G et al (2016) Cost-minimization analysis of three decision strategies for cardiac revascularization: results of the “suspected CAD” cohort of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:3CrossRef Moschetti K, Petersen SE, Pilz G et al (2016) Cost-minimization analysis of three decision strategies for cardiac revascularization: results of the “suspected CAD” cohort of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:3CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Prati G, Vitrella G, Allocca G et al (2015) Right ventricular strain and dyssynchrony assessment in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003647 discussion e003647CrossRef Prati G, Vitrella G, Allocca G et al (2015) Right ventricular strain and dyssynchrony assessment in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003647 discussion e003647CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Chirinos JA, Sardana M, Ansari B et al (2018) Left atrial phasic function by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking is a strong predictor of incident cardiovascular events. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11:e007512CrossRef Chirinos JA, Sardana M, Ansari B et al (2018) Left atrial phasic function by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking is a strong predictor of incident cardiovascular events. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11:e007512CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of contrast agent and spatial resolution on myocardial strain results using feature tracking MRI
Authors
Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff
Tobias Schunke
Stephanie Reiter
Roland Scheck
Berthold Höfling
Günter Pilz
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06971-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

European Radiology 11/2020 Go to the issue