Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Artificial Intelligence | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Differentiating kidney stones from phleboliths in unenhanced low-dose computed tomography using radiomics and machine learning

Authors: Thomas De Perrot, Jeremy Hofmeister, Simon Burgermeister, Steve P. Martin, Gregoire Feutry, Jacques Klein, Xavier Montet

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Distinguishing between kidney stones and phleboliths can constitute a diagnostic challenge in patients undergoing unenhanced low-dose CT (LDCT) for acute flank pain. We sought to investigate the accuracy of radiomics and a machine-learning classifier in differentiating between kidney stones and phleboliths on LDCT.

Methods

Radiomics features were extracted following a semi-automatic segmentation of kidney stones and phleboliths for two independent consecutive cohorts of patients undergoing LDCT for acute flank pain.
Radiomics features from the first cohort of patients (n = 369) were ultimately used to train a machine-learning model designed to distinguish kidney stones (n = 211) from phleboliths (n = 201). Classification performance was assessed on the second independent cohort (i.e., testing set) (kidney stones n = 24; phleboliths n = 23) using positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), area under the receiver operating curves (AUC), and permutation testing.

Results

Our machine-learning classification model trained on radiomics features achieved an overall accuracy of 85.1% on the independent testing set, with an AUC of 0.902, PPV of 81.5%, and NPV of 90.0%. Classification accuracy was significantly better than chance on permutation testing (p < 0.05, permutation p value).

Conclusion

Radiomics and machine learning enable accurate differentiation between kidney stones and phleboliths on LDCT in patients presenting with acute flank pain.

Key Points

Combining a machine-learning algorithm with radiomics features extracted for abdominopelvic calcification on LDCT offers a highly accurate method for discriminating phleboliths from kidney stones.
Our radiomics and machine-learning model proved robust for CT acquisition and reconstruction protocol when tested in comparison with an external independent cohort of patients with acute flank pain.
The high performance of the radiomics-based automatic classification model in differentiating phleboliths from kidney stones indicates its potential as a future diagnostic tool for equivocal abdominopelvic calcifications in the setting of suspected renal colic.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933CrossRefPubMed Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Luk AC, Cleaveland P, Olson L, Neilson D, Srirangam SJ (2017) Pelvic phlebolith: a trivial pursuit for the urologist? J Endourol 31:342–347CrossRefPubMed Luk AC, Cleaveland P, Olson L, Neilson D, Srirangam SJ (2017) Pelvic phlebolith: a trivial pursuit for the urologist? J Endourol 31:342–347CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Traubici J, Neitlich JD, Smith RC (1999) Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center? AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:13–17CrossRefPubMed Traubici J, Neitlich JD, Smith RC (1999) Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center? AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:13–17CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Williams JC Jr, McAteer JA, Evan AP, Lingeman JE (2010) Micro-computed tomography for analysis of urinary calculi. Urol Res 38:477–484CrossRefPubMed Williams JC Jr, McAteer JA, Evan AP, Lingeman JE (2010) Micro-computed tomography for analysis of urinary calculi. Urol Res 38:477–484CrossRefPubMed
7.
10.
go back to reference Larue RT, Defraene G, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P, van Elmpt W (2017) Quantitative radiomics studies for tissue characterization: a review of technology and methodological procedures. Br J Radiol 90:20160665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Larue RT, Defraene G, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P, van Elmpt W (2017) Quantitative radiomics studies for tissue characterization: a review of technology and methodological procedures. Br J Radiol 90:20160665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006CrossRefPubMed Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3:610–621 Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3:610–621
13.
14.
go back to reference Cawley GC, Talbot NLC (2010) On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J Mach Learn Res 11:2079–2107 Cawley GC, Talbot NLC (2010) On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J Mach Learn Res 11:2079–2107
15.
go back to reference Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830 Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
16.
go back to reference Kim JC (2001) Central lucency of pelvic phleboliths: comparison of radiographs and noncontrast helical CT. Clin Imaging 25:122–125CrossRefPubMed Kim JC (2001) Central lucency of pelvic phleboliths: comparison of radiographs and noncontrast helical CT. Clin Imaging 25:122–125CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Williams JC Jr, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, Worcester EM, Evan AP (2015) Micro-CT imaging of Randall’s plaques. Urolithiasis 43(Suppl 1):13–17CrossRefPubMed Williams JC Jr, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, Worcester EM, Evan AP (2015) Micro-CT imaging of Randall’s plaques. Urolithiasis 43(Suppl 1):13–17CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Tann M et al (2004) Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. Urology 63:828–833CrossRefPubMed Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Tann M et al (2004) Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. Urology 63:828–833CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Boridy IC, Nikolaidis P, Kawashima A, Goldman SM, Sandler CM (1999) Ureterolithiasis: value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 211:619–621CrossRefPubMed Boridy IC, Nikolaidis P, Kawashima A, Goldman SM, Sandler CM (1999) Ureterolithiasis: value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 211:619–621CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Heneghan JP, Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1997) Soft-tissue “rim” sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 202:709–711CrossRefPubMed Heneghan JP, Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1997) Soft-tissue “rim” sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 202:709–711CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Beig N, Patel J, Prasanna P et al (2018) Radiogenomic analysis of hypoxia pathway is predictive of overall survival in glioblastoma. Sci Rep 8(7) Beig N, Patel J, Prasanna P et al (2018) Radiogenomic analysis of hypoxia pathway is predictive of overall survival in glioblastoma. Sci Rep 8(7)
22.
go back to reference Thawani R, McLane M, Beig N et al (2018) Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: a review for the clinician. Lung Cancer 115:34–41CrossRefPubMed Thawani R, McLane M, Beig N et al (2018) Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: a review for the clinician. Lung Cancer 115:34–41CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Parmar C, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar R et al (2014) Robust Radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation. PLoS One 9:e102107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parmar C, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar R et al (2014) Robust Radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation. PLoS One 9:e102107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Incoronato M, Aiello M, Infante T et al (2017) Radiogenomic analysis of oncological data: a technical survey. Int J Mol Sci 18 Incoronato M, Aiello M, Infante T et al (2017) Radiogenomic analysis of oncological data: a technical survey. Int J Mol Sci 18
Metadata
Title
Differentiating kidney stones from phleboliths in unenhanced low-dose computed tomography using radiomics and machine learning
Authors
Thomas De Perrot
Jeremy Hofmeister
Simon Burgermeister
Steve P. Martin
Gregoire Feutry
Jacques Klein
Xavier Montet
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-6004-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

European Radiology 9/2019 Go to the issue