Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2020

Open Access 01-03-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Breast

Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI

Authors: G. J. Wengert, F. Pipan, J. Almohanna, H. Bickel, S. Polanec, P. Kapetas, P. Clauser, K. Pinker, T. H. Helbich, P. A. T. Baltzer

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether the application of the Kaiser score for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might downgrade breast lesions that present as mammographic calcifications and avoid unnecessary breast biopsies

Methods

This IRB-approved, retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study included 167 consecutive patients with suspicious mammographic calcifications and histopathologically verified results. These patients underwent a pre-interventional breast MRI exam for further diagnostic assessment before vacuum-assisted stereotactic-guided biopsy (95 malignant and 72 benign lesions). Two breast radiologists with different levels of experience independently read all examinations using the Kaiser score, a machine learning–derived clinical decision-making tool that provides probabilities of malignancy by a formalized combination of diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and inter-reader agreement by the calculation of Cohen’s kappa coefficients.

Results

Application of the Kaiser score revealed a large area under the ROC curve (0.859–0.889). Rule-out criteria, with high sensitivity, were applied to mass and non-mass lesions alike. The rate of potentially avoidable breast biopsies ranged between 58.3 and 65.3%, with the lowest rate observed with the least experienced reader.

Conclusions

Applying the Kaiser score to breast MRI allows stratifying the risk of breast cancer in lesions that present as suspicious calcifications on mammography and may thus avoid unnecessary breast biopsies.

Key Points

• The Kaiser score is a helpful clinical decision tool for distinguishing malignant from benign breast lesions that present as calcifications on mammography.
• Application of the Kaiser score may obviate 58.3–65.3% of unnecessary stereotactic biopsies of suspicious calcifications.
• High Kaiser scores predict breast cancer with high specificity, aiding clinical decision-making with regard to re-biopsy in case of negative results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology. 265(3):707–714CrossRef Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology. 265(3):707–714CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hofvind S, Iversen BF, Eriksen L, Styr BM, Kjellevold K, Kurz KD (2011) Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Acta Radiol 52(5):481–487CrossRef Hofvind S, Iversen BF, Eriksen L, Styr BM, Kjellevold K, Kurz KD (2011) Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Acta Radiol 52(5):481–487CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Castronovo V, Bellahcene A (1998) Evidence that breast cancer associated microcalcifications are mineralized malignant cells. Int J Oncol 12(2):305–308PubMed Castronovo V, Bellahcene A (1998) Evidence that breast cancer associated microcalcifications are mineralized malignant cells. Int J Oncol 12(2):305–308PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18(7):1307–1318CrossRef Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18(7):1307–1318CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rominger M, Wisgickl C, Timmesfeld N (2012) Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications. Rofo 184(12):1144–1152CrossRef Rominger M, Wisgickl C, Timmesfeld N (2012) Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications. Rofo 184(12):1144–1152CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1723–1732 Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1723–1732
7.
go back to reference Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, Oestmann JW (1998) MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology. 207(3):675–681CrossRef Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, Oestmann JW (1998) MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology. 207(3):675–681CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat 103(3):269–281CrossRef Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat 103(3):269–281CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dietzel M, Baltzer PAT (2018) How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 9(3):325–335CrossRef Dietzel M, Baltzer PAT (2018) How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 9(3):325–335CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA (2013) A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography. Eur Radiol 23(8):2051–2060CrossRef Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA (2013) A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography. Eur Radiol 23(8):2051–2060CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marino MA, Clauser P, Woitek R et al (2016) A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol 26(8):2529–2537 Marino MA, Clauser P, Woitek R et al (2016) A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol 26(8):2529–2537
12.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46(8):1296–1316 Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46(8):1296–1316
14.
go back to reference Schrading S, Distelmaier M, Dirrichs T et al (2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 274(3):654–662 Schrading S, Distelmaier M, Dirrichs T et al (2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 274(3):654–662
16.
go back to reference Pasquini L, Napolitano A, Visconti E, et al (2018) Gadolinium-based contrast agent-related toxicities. CNS Drugs 32(3):229–240CrossRef Pasquini L, Napolitano A, Visconti E, et al (2018) Gadolinium-based contrast agent-related toxicities. CNS Drugs 32(3):229–240CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hobbs MM, Taylor DB, Buzynski S, Peake RE (2015) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): patient preferences and tolerance. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 59(3):300–305CrossRef Hobbs MM, Taylor DB, Buzynski S, Peake RE (2015) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): patient preferences and tolerance. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 59(3):300–305CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Woitek R, Spick C, Schernthaner M et al (2017) A simple classification system (the Tree flowchart) for breast MRI can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in MRI-only lesions. Eur Radiol 27(9):3799–3809 Woitek R, Spick C, Schernthaner M et al (2017) A simple classification system (the Tree flowchart) for breast MRI can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in MRI-only lesions. Eur Radiol 27(9):3799–3809
19.
go back to reference Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA (2017) MR imaging for diagnosis of malignancy in mammographic microcalcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 283(3):692–701CrossRef Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA (2017) MR imaging for diagnosis of malignancy in mammographic microcalcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 283(3):692–701CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1658–1663CrossRef Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1658–1663CrossRef
21.
go back to reference DeMartini WB, Liu F, Peacock S, Eby PR, Gutierrez RL, Lehman CD (2012) Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(4):W373–W380CrossRef DeMartini WB, Liu F, Peacock S, Eby PR, Gutierrez RL, Lehman CD (2012) Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(4):W373–W380CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI
Authors
G. J. Wengert
F. Pipan
J. Almohanna
H. Bickel
S. Polanec
P. Kapetas
P. Clauser
K. Pinker
T. H. Helbich
P. A. T. Baltzer
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06444-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

European Radiology 3/2020 Go to the issue