Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-01-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Breast

Interobserver variability and likelihood of malignancy for fifth edition BI-RADS MRI descriptors in non-mass breast lesions

Authors: Magdalena Lunkiewicz, Serafino Forte, Bianka Freiwald, Gad Singer, Cornelia Leo, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Non-mass enhancement (NME) in breast MRI is the most common feature of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We sought to evaluate the interobserver variability and positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy of NME descriptors using the fifth edition BI-RADS lexicon focusing on the newly introduced “clustered ring enhancement” pattern.

Materials and methods

Breast MRIs of 129 patients who had undergone MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in our institution were reviewed. Studies assessed as NME were classified according to the fifth edition BI-RADS lexicon by two breast radiologists. Consensus was reached by involving a third radiologist. Interobserver variability and PPV for malignancy were assessed.

Results

Seventy-two of 129 studies were assessed as NME. The disagreement rate in the first assessment step (mass vs. NME) was low at 9.3% (ĸ = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.91). The disagreement rate for distribution patterns was 23.6% (ĸ = 0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.80) and 22.2% (ĸ = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.81) for internal enhancement patterns. Clustered ring enhancement (PPV 53.85, p = 0.038) and segmental distribution (PPV 62.5%, p = 0.028) had the highest malignancy rates among internal enhancement and distribution patterns with a significant result; the combination of clustered ring enhancement and segmental distribution raised the malignancy rate by approximately 4% (PPV 66.67%, p = 0.049).

Conclusion

There was a high agreement rate among readers when differentiating NME from mass lesions. The agreement rate was lower when assessing the distribution and internal enhancement pattern descriptors, but still substantial. The descriptors clustered ring enhancement and segmental distribution were significant predictors of malignancy.

Key Points

• Non-mass enhancement is a common morphological feature of non-invasive breast cancer (DCIS) in MRI. Differentiation between potentially malignant and benign changes may be very challenging.
• Since clustered ring enhancement and segmental distribution are both significant predictors of malignancy, the awareness of this important finding, combined with high-quality image interpretation skills, may improve the tumor detection rate.
• The combination of clustered ring enhancement and segmental distribution increases the positive predictive value for malignancy, which may be relevant for clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Esserman LJ, Joe BN (2016) Diagnostic evaluation of women with suspected breast cancer. UpToDate, Topic 808, Version 36.0 Esserman LJ, Joe BN (2016) Diagnostic evaluation of women with suspected breast cancer. UpToDate, Topic 808, Version 36.0
2.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849CrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gweon HM, Cho N, Seo M, Chu AJ, Moon WK (2014) Computer-aided evaluation as an adjunct to revised BI-RADS atlas: improvement in positive predictive value at screening breast MRI. Eur Radiol 24:1800–1807CrossRef Gweon HM, Cho N, Seo M, Chu AJ, Moon WK (2014) Computer-aided evaluation as an adjunct to revised BI-RADS atlas: improvement in positive predictive value at screening breast MRI. Eur Radiol 24:1800–1807CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kavanagh AM, Giles GG, Mitchell H, Cawson JN (2000) The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status. J Med Screen 7:105–110CrossRef Kavanagh AM, Giles GG, Mitchell H, Cawson JN (2000) The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status. J Med Screen 7:105–110CrossRef
5.
go back to reference LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861CrossRef LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861CrossRef
6.
go back to reference DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1128–1134CrossRef DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1128–1134CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN et al (2010) MR-directed (“second-look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. Am J Roentgenol 194:370–377CrossRef Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN et al (2010) MR-directed (“second-look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. Am J Roentgenol 194:370–377CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Spick C, Schernthaner M, Pinker K et al (2016) MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience. Eur Radiol 26:3908–3916CrossRef Spick C, Schernthaner M, Pinker K et al (2016) MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience. Eur Radiol 26:3908–3916CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Morris EACC, Lee CH et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology Morris EACC, Lee CH et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology
10.
go back to reference Howell A, Anderson AS, Clarke RB et al (2014) Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 16:446CrossRef Howell A, Anderson AS, Clarke RB et al (2014) Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 16:446CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1658–1663CrossRef Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA (2010) False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1658–1663CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:994–1000CrossRef Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:994–1000CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gity M, Ghazi Moghadam K, Jalali AH, Shakiba M (2014) Association of different MRI BIRADS descriptors with malignancy in non mass-like breast lesions. Iran Red Crescent Med J 16 Gity M, Ghazi Moghadam K, Jalali AH, Shakiba M (2014) Association of different MRI BIRADS descriptors with malignancy in non mass-like breast lesions. Iran Red Crescent Med J 16
14.
go back to reference Chadashvili T, Ghosh E, Fein-Zachary V et al (2014) Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:219–227CrossRef Chadashvili T, Ghosh E, Fein-Zachary V et al (2014) Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:219–227CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition. Radiographics 36:623–639CrossRef Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition. Radiographics 36:623–639CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K et al (2008) Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer 15(3):241–246CrossRef Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K et al (2008) Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer 15(3):241–246CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chikarmane SA, Michaels AY, Giess CS (2017) Revisiting nonmass enhancement in breast MRI: analysis of outcomes and follow-up using the updated BI-RADS atlas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:1178–1184CrossRef Chikarmane SA, Michaels AY, Giess CS (2017) Revisiting nonmass enhancement in breast MRI: analysis of outcomes and follow-up using the updated BI-RADS atlas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:1178–1184CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Asada T, Yamada T, Kanemaki Y, Fujiwara K, Okamoto S, Nakajima Y (2017) Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy. Jpn J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0717-9 Asada T, Yamada T, Kanemaki Y, Fujiwara K, Okamoto S, Nakajima Y (2017) Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy. Jpn J Radiol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11604-017-0717-9
20.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Fukuda K (2006) High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:330–337CrossRef Tozaki M, Fukuda K (2006) High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:330–337CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K (2006) Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:313–321CrossRef Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K (2006) Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:313–321CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Imschweiler T, Haueisen H, Kampmann G et al (2014) MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques. Eur Radiol 24:128–135CrossRef Imschweiler T, Haueisen H, Kampmann G et al (2014) MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques. Eur Radiol 24:128–135CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kurtz C, Kubik-Huch RA, Kampmann G, Rageth C, Öhlschlegel C (2014) Interdisziplinäre Konsensus-Guidelines für dei Durchführung von MRT-gestützten Vakkumbiopsien der Schweizer Gesellschaft für Senologie (SGS) - erarbeitet durch die MIBB Arbeitsgruppe. Senologie 11:1–10 Kurtz C, Kubik-Huch RA, Kampmann G, Rageth C, Öhlschlegel C (2014) Interdisziplinäre Konsensus-Guidelines für dei Durchführung von MRT-gestützten Vakkumbiopsien der Schweizer Gesellschaft für Senologie (SGS) - erarbeitet durch die MIBB Arbeitsgruppe. Senologie 11:1–10
24.
go back to reference Saladin C, Haueisen H, Kampmann G et al (2016) Lesions with unclear malignant potential (B3) after minimally invasive breast biopsy: evaluation of vacuum biopsies performed in Switzerland and recommended further management. Acta Radiol 57:815–821CrossRef Saladin C, Haueisen H, Kampmann G et al (2016) Lesions with unclear malignant potential (B3) after minimally invasive breast biopsy: evaluation of vacuum biopsies performed in Switzerland and recommended further management. Acta Radiol 57:815–821CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Toernberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast screening and diagnosis. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 221–256 Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Toernberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast screening and diagnosis. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 221–256
26.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
27.
go back to reference R Core Team (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria R Core Team (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
28.
go back to reference Yang QX, Ji X, Feng LL et al (2017) Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement. J Xray Sci Technol 25:1033–1044PubMed Yang QX, Ji X, Feng LL et al (2017) Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement. J Xray Sci Technol 25:1033–1044PubMed
29.
go back to reference Uematsu T, Kasami M (2012) High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1223–1230CrossRef Uematsu T, Kasami M (2012) High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1223–1230CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Milosevic ZC, Nadrljanski MM, Milovanovic ZM, Gusic NZ, Vucicevic SS, Radulovic OS (2017) Breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: fibrocystic changes presenting as a non-mass enhancement mimicking malignancy. Radiol Oncol 51:130–136CrossRef Milosevic ZC, Nadrljanski MM, Milovanovic ZM, Gusic NZ, Vucicevic SS, Radulovic OS (2017) Breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: fibrocystic changes presenting as a non-mass enhancement mimicking malignancy. Radiol Oncol 51:130–136CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interobserver variability and likelihood of malignancy for fifth edition BI-RADS MRI descriptors in non-mass breast lesions
Authors
Magdalena Lunkiewicz
Serafino Forte
Bianka Freiwald
Gad Singer
Cornelia Leo
Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06312-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Radiology 1/2020 Go to the issue