Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Ultrasound | Interventional

Ultrasound- versus fluoroscopy-guided injections in the lower back for the management of pain: a systematic review

Authors: Mark Hofmeister, Laura E. Dowsett, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Fiona Clement

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Ultrasound-guided spinal injections are less common than fluoroscopy-guided injections. Although unable to penetrate bones, ultrasound guidance has a number of advantages including convenience and reduced exposure to ionizing radiation. However, it is not known how ultrasound-guided injections compare to fluoroscopy-guided injections in the management of lower back pain. Our objective is to systematically review the literature comparing ultrasound-guided injections to fluoroscopy-guided injections for the management of lower back pain.

Methods

Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and NHSEED were searched from 2007 to September 26, 2017. Inclusion criteria included (1) randomized controlled trial design, (2) compared ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided injections for lower back pain, (3) dose and volume of medications injected were identical between trial arms, and (4) reported original data.

Results

One hundred one unique records were identified, and 21 studies were considered for full-text inclusion. Nine studies formed the final data set. Studies comparing ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided injections for lower back pain management reported no difference in pain relief, procedure time, number of needle passes, changes in disability indices, complications or adverse events, post-procedure opioid consumption, or patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

Fluoroscopic guidance of injections for the management of lower back pain is similar in efficacy to ultrasound guidance. The exact role of ultrasound guidance needs to be further studied, especially for nerve root injections, where safety is the major concern.

Key Points

• There were no differences in pain relief, procedure time, number of needle passes, changes in disability indices, complications or adverse events, post-procedure opioid consumption, or patient satisfaction between ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided injections for the management of lower back pain.
• Given the lack of evidence to demonstrate superior efficacy and the added harms with fluoroscopic guidance, ultrasound guidance may be the preferred method of guidance for injections to manage lower back pain in appropriate patients. Further study is required to understand the exact role of ultrasound in image-guided injections.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Andersson GB (1998) Epidemiology of low back pain. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 69:28–31CrossRef
2.
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P et al (2014) The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:968–974CrossRefPubMed
3.
Katz J (2006) Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:21–24PubMed
4.
Yoon SH, O'Brien SL, Tran M (2013) Ultrasound guided spine injections: advancement over fluoroscopic guidance? Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 1:104–113CrossRef
5.
Korbe S, Udoji EN, Ness TJ, Udoji MA (2015) Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for chronic pain management. Pain Manag 5:4650482CrossRef
6.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535
7.
8.
9.
Reulen RC, Winter DL, Frobisher C et al (2010) Long-term cause-specific mortality among survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 304:172–179CrossRefPubMed
10.
Yun DH, Kim HS, Yoo SD et al (2012) Efficacy of ultrasonography-guided injections in patients with facet syndrome of the low lumbar spine. Ann Rehabil Med 36:66–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Yang G, Liu J, Ma L et al (2016) Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-controlled lumbar transforaminal epidural injections: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin J Pain 32:103–108CrossRefPubMed
12.
Akkaya T, Ozkan D, Kertmen H, Sekerci Z (2017) Caudal epidural steroid injections in postlaminectomy patients: comparison of ultrasonography and fluoroscopy. Turk Neurosurg 27:420–425PubMed
13.
Park Y, Lee JH, Park K, Ahn J, Park J, Jee H (2013) Ultrasound-guided vs. fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of unilateral lower lumbar radicular pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92:575–586CrossRefPubMed
14.
Evansa I, Logina I, Vanags I, Borgeat A (2015) Ultrasound versus fluoroscopic-guided epidural steroid injections in patients with degenerative spinal diseases. Eur J Anaesthesiol 32:262–268CrossRefPubMed
15.
Hazra AK, Bhattacharya D, Mukherjee S, Ghosh S, Mitra M, Mandal M (2016) Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiculopathy: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Indian J Anaesth 60:388–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Soneji N, Bhatia A, Seib R, Tumber P, Dissanayake M, Peng PW (2016) Comparison of fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance for sacroiliac joint injection in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Pract 16:537–544CrossRefPubMed
17.
Jee H, Lee JH, Park KD, Ahn J, Park Y (2014) Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95:330–337CrossRefPubMed
18.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Smith HS, Hirsch J (2009) Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: a 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006. Pain Physician 12:9–34PubMed
19.
Kim KP, Miller DL, Berrington de Gonzalez A et al (2012) Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures. Health Phys 103:80–99
20.
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD (2004) Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232:735–738CrossRefPubMed
21.
Kim KP, Miller DL (2009) Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 133:227–233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Linet MS, Kitahara CM, Ntowe E et al (2017) Mortality in U.S. physicians likely to perform fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures compared with psychiatrists, 1979 to 2008. Radiology 284:482–494CrossRefPubMed
23.
Peng PWH, Samer N (2009) Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in pain medicine: a review of anatomy, sonoanatomy, and procedures: part I: nonaxial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:458–474CrossRefPubMed
24.
Krämer J, Blettner M, Hammer GP (2008) Image guided injection therapy in the lumbar spine. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105:596–598PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Gharries H (2018) Is ultrasound guided spine injection safe? J Anesth Crit Care Open Access 10:131–138
26.
Goodman BS, Posecion LW, Mallempati S, Bayazitoglu M (2008) Complications and pitfalls of lumbar interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1:212–222CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Gharaei H (2017) Spine sono-intervention warning & safety recommendations, 5th edn. International Conference and Exhibition on Pain Research and Management, London
28.
Wu T, Zhoa WH, Dong Y, Song HX, Li JH (2016) Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy or computed tomography scanning guidance in lumbar facet joint injections in adults with facet joint syndrome: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 97:1558–1563CrossRefPubMed
29.
Sartoris R, Orlandi D, Corazza A et al (2017) In vivo feasibility of real-time MR-US fusion imaging lumbar facet joint injections. J Ultrasound 20:23–31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Ultrasound- versus fluoroscopy-guided injections in the lower back for the management of pain: a systematic review
Authors
Mark Hofmeister
Laura E. Dowsett
Diane L. Lorenzetti
Fiona Clement
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06065-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

European Radiology 7/2019 Go to the issue

Breast

A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations

Cardiac

Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography?

Magnetic Resonance

Automated quantitative evaluation of brain MRI may be more accurate for discriminating preterm born adults

Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part II: convolutional neural network interpretation using radiologic imaging features

Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a convolutional neural network classifier for multi-phasic MRI

Computed Tomography

Objective and subjective comparison of virtual monoenergetic vs. polychromatic images in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma