Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Health Economy

Assessment of the safety climate in outpatient diagnostic services: Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire

Authors: Marianne Jossen, Fabio Valeri, Christina Heilmaier, David Schwappach

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Safe practice and safety culture are important issues in outpatient diagnostic imaging services. As questionnaires assessing safety culture through the measurement of safety climate in this setting are not yet available, the present study aimed to develop and validate such an instrument.

Materials and methods

After adaptation of an existing questionnaire and qualitative pretesting, the instrument was tested by collaborators from three outpatient imaging services in Switzerland. Results were first assessed using descriptive statistics. Scores of individual services were compared using a Wilcoxon test assessing differences between rank distributions. The final instrument was tested for validity using inter-rater agreement measures, such as reliability within groups (rWG), and an intraclass correlation coefficient measure (ICC(1)). These measures allowed the assessment of validity of aggregation into a total score (rWG(j)) and validated the instrument for its capacity to distinguish various safety climates of different groups by comparing inter-rater agreement in the overall sample to inter-rater agreement of individual services (rWG) and by measuring group effects (ICC(1)). Furthermore, the final instrument was tested for internal consistency and reliability using Cronbach’s Alpha.

Results

Safety climate scores vary significantly between services. Inter-rater agreement measures show that item aggregation is justified and that the instrument distinguishes various patterns of safety climate. The final instrument proves to be valid, consistent and reliable.

Conclusions

The final instrument presents a valid, consistent and reliable option to measure safety climate in outpatient diagnostic imaging services. Results can be used as a basis for quality improvement.

Key Points

• An adapted questionnaire that assesses safety climate in outpatient diagnostic imaging services was developed and tested in Switzerland.
• Psychometric evaluation showed the questionnaire to be a valid, consistent and reliable instrument.
• Results are of interest for imaging services as well as for stakeholders interested more globally in monitoring and quality improvement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Bundesamt für Gesundheit BAG (2017) [Change of the Ordinance on the Determination and Adaptation of Structures of the Reimbursement System of the Health Insurance]. Bundesamt für Gesundheit, Bern
3.
George R, Lau L, Ng K (2014) Team approach to optimize radiology techniques. In: Lau L, Ng K (eds) Radiological safety and quality. Paradigms in leadership and innovation. Springer, Dordrecht
4.
Gehring K, Schwappach D, Battaglia M et al (2012) Frequency of harm associated with primary care safety incidents. Am J Manag Care 19:323–337
5.
Weaver SJ, Lubomksi LH, Wilson RF et al (2013) Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 158:369–374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zohar D, Livine Y, Tenne-Gazit O, Admi H, Donchin Y (2007) Healthcare climate: A framework for measuring and improving patient safety. Crit Care Med 35:1312–1317CrossRefPubMed
7.
DiCuccio MH (2015) The relationship between patient safety culture and patient outcomes: A systematic review. J Patient Saf 11:135–142CrossRefPubMed
8.
Azevedo KB, da Silva CA, Abrantes A (2017) Assessing the hospital survey of patient safety culture. A review of the assumptions, methods and data analysis protocol. Desenvolvimento e Sociedade 3:7-31
9.
Colla JB, Bracken AC, Kinney LM, Weeks WB (2005) Measuring patient safety climate: A review of surveys. Qual Saf Health Care 14:364–366
10.
Manser T, Brösterhaus M, Hammer A (2014) You can't improve what you don't measure: Safety climate measures available in the German-speaking countries to support safety culture development in healthcare. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 114:58–71CrossRef
11.
12.
Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB et al (2006) The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 6:44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Weingart SN, Farbstein K, Davis RB, Phillips RS (2004) Using a multihospital survey to examine the safety culture. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30:125–132
14.
Pfeiffer Y, Manser T (2010) Development of the german version of the hospital survey on patient safety culture: Dimensionality and psychometric properties. Saf Sci 48:1452–1462CrossRef
15.
Zimmermann N, Küng K, Sereika SM, Engberg S, Sexton B, Schwendimann R (2013) Assessing the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals - a validation study. BMC Health Serv Res 13:347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Gehring K, Mascherek A, Bezzola P, Schwappach D (2015) Safety climate in Swiss hospital units: Swiss version of the safety climate survey. J Eval Clin Pract 21:332–338
17.
Schutz A, Counte MA, Meurer S (2007) Development of a patient safety culture measurement tool for ambulatory health care settings: Analysis of content validity. Health Care Manag Sci 10:139–149CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hoffmann B, Domanska OM, Müller V, Gerlach FM (2009) Development of a questionnaire on the safety climate in family doctor’s services (FraSiK): Transcultural adaptation – report on methods. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 103:521–529CrossRefPubMed
19.
Modak I, Helmreich RL, Thomas EJ, Sexton BJ, Lux TR (2007) Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting: The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version. J Gen Intern Med 22:1–5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Ferris N, Kavnoudias H, Thiel C, Stuckey S (2007) The 2005 Australian MRI safety survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1388–1394CrossRef
21.
De Wet C, Spence W, Mash R, Johnson P, Bowie P (2010) The development and psychometric evaluation of a safety climate measure for primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 19:578–854PubMed
22.
Häder M (2006) Empiric social research – An introduction. Verlag für Sozialforschung, Wiesbaden
23.
Giai J, Boussat B, Occelli P et al (2017) Hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPS): variability of scoring strategies. Int J Qual Healthcare 29:685–692CrossRef
24.
Sorra J, Gray L, Streagle S et al (2016) AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: User’s Guide. AHRQ Publication No. 15-0049-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
25.
Bauer DF (1972) Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 67:687–690CrossRef
26.
Hollander M, Douglas AW (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York
27.
LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement. Organizational Research Methods 11:815–852
28.
James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group inter-rater reliability with and without response bias. J Appl Psychol 69:85–98CrossRef
29.
James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1993) rwg: An assessment of within-group inter-rater agreement. J Appl Psychol 78:306–309CrossRef
30.
Ginsburg L, Oore GD (2016) Patient safety climate strength: a concept that requires more attention. BMJ Qual Saf. 25:680–687CrossRefPubMed
31.
Smith-Crowe K, Burke MJ, Cohen A, Doveh E (2014) Statistical significance criteria for the rWG and average deviation inter-rater agreement indices. J Appl Psychol 99:239–261CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal strucutre of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef
34.
R DevelopmentCore Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Metadata
Title
Assessment of the safety climate in outpatient diagnostic services: Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire
Authors
Marianne Jossen
Fabio Valeri
Christina Heilmaier
David Schwappach
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5646-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

European Radiology 3/2019 Go to the issue

Cardiac

Left ventricular extracellular volume fraction and atrioventricular interaction in hypertension

Magnetic Resonance

Decreased cerebral blood flow and improved cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease after peritoneal dialysis: An arterial spin-labelling study

Gastrointestinal

Magnetic resonance enterography, small bowel ultrasound and colonoscopy to diagnose and stage Crohn’s disease: patient acceptability and perceived burden

Oncology

68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in comparison with 18F-fluoride-PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Urogenital

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade

Urogenital

Accessory cavitated uterine mass: MRI features and surgical correlations of a rare but under-recognised entity