Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2018

Open Access 01-10-2018 | Magnetic Resonance

Initial experience of an investigational 3T MR scanner designed for use on neonatal wards

Authors: Paul D. Griffiths, Deborah Jarvis, Leanne Armstrong, Daniel J. A. Connolly, Pauline Bayliss, Julie Cook, Anthony R. Hart, Elizabeth Pilling, Tamanna Williams, Martyn N. J. Paley

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

MR imaging of neonates is difficult for many reasons and a major factor is safe transport to the MR facilities. In this article we describe the use of a small, investigational 3-T MR customised for brain imaging and sited on a neonatal unit of a tertiary centre in the UK, which is in contrast to a 300-m journey to the whole-body MR scanner used at present for clinical cases.

Methods

We describe our methods for preparing babies for safe transport and scanning on an investigational 3-T MR scanner on a neonatal unit and the development of appropriate MR sequences. The MR scanner does not have CE marking at present so this early development work was undertaken on normal neonates whose parents consented to a research examination.

Results

Fifty-two babies were scanned and there were no serious adverse events. The MR examinations were considered to be diagnostically evaluable in all 52 cases and in 90% the imaging was considered to be at least as good as the quality obtained on the 1.5-T scanner currently used for clinical cases.

Conclusion

We have shown that this investigational 3-T MR scanner can be used safely on a neonatal unit and we have refined the MR sequences to a point that they are clinically usable.

Key Points

• Access to neonatal MR imaging is limited.
• We describe an investigational 3-T MR scanner site on a neonatal unit.
• The scanner produces images suitable for clinical practice.
Literature
2.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission (2008) Medical electrical equipment – Particular requirements for the safety of MR equipment for medical diagnosis IEC 60601-2-33 ed 2.2 (Geneva IEC) with amendments 1 and 2 International Electrotechnical Commission (2008) Medical electrical equipment – Particular requirements for the safety of MR equipment for medical diagnosis IEC 60601-2-33 ed 2.2 (Geneva IEC) with amendments 1 and 2
3.
go back to reference Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Lonneker-Lammers T et al (2004) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the neonate in a magnetic resonance-compatible incubator with a built-in coil. Pediatrics 113(2):150–152CrossRef Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Lonneker-Lammers T et al (2004) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of the neonate in a magnetic resonance-compatible incubator with a built-in coil. Pediatrics 113(2):150–152CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Paley MN, Hart AR, Lait M, Griffiths PD (2012) An MR-compatible neonatal incubator. Br J Radiol 85(1015):952–983CrossRef Paley MN, Hart AR, Lait M, Griffiths PD (2012) An MR-compatible neonatal incubator. Br J Radiol 85(1015):952–983CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Merchant N, Groves A, Larkman DJ et al (2009) A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 85(12):779–783CrossRef Merchant N, Groves A, Larkman DJ et al (2009) A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 85(12):779–783CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hughes EJ, Winchman T, Padormo F et al (2017) A dedicated neonatal brain imaging system. Magn Reson Med 78(2):794–804CrossRef Hughes EJ, Winchman T, Padormo F et al (2017) A dedicated neonatal brain imaging system. Magn Reson Med 78(2):794–804CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Rutter S et al (2004) Frequency and natural history of subdural haemorrhages in babies and relation to obstetric factors. Lancet 363(9412):846–851CrossRef Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Rutter S et al (2004) Frequency and natural history of subdural haemorrhages in babies and relation to obstetric factors. Lancet 363(9412):846–851CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lother S, Schiff SJ, Neuberger T, Jakob PM, Fidler F (2016) Design of a mobile, homogeneous, and efficient electromagnet with a large field of view for neonatal low-field MRI. MAGMA 29(4):691–698CrossRef Lother S, Schiff SJ, Neuberger T, Jakob PM, Fidler F (2016) Design of a mobile, homogeneous, and efficient electromagnet with a large field of view for neonatal low-field MRI. MAGMA 29(4):691–698CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tkach JA, Merhar SL, Kline-Fath BM et al (2014) MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system. Am J Roentgenol 202(1):95–105CrossRef Tkach JA, Merhar SL, Kline-Fath BM et al (2014) MRI in the neonatal ICU: initial experience using a small-footprint 1.5-T system. Am J Roentgenol 202(1):95–105CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Merhar SL, Tkach JA, Woods JC et al (2017) Neonatal imaging using an on-site small footprint MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol 47(8):1001–1011CrossRef Merhar SL, Tkach JA, Woods JC et al (2017) Neonatal imaging using an on-site small footprint MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol 47(8):1001–1011CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cawley P, Few K, Greenwood R et al (2016) Does magnetic resonance brain scanning at 3.0 Tesla pose a hyperthermic challenge to term neonates? J Pediatrics 175:228-30.e1CrossRef Cawley P, Few K, Greenwood R et al (2016) Does magnetic resonance brain scanning at 3.0 Tesla pose a hyperthermic challenge to term neonates? J Pediatrics 175:228-30.e1CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Initial experience of an investigational 3T MR scanner designed for use on neonatal wards
Authors
Paul D. Griffiths
Deborah Jarvis
Leanne Armstrong
Daniel J. A. Connolly
Pauline Bayliss
Julie Cook
Anthony R. Hart
Elizabeth Pilling
Tamanna Williams
Martyn N. J. Paley
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5357-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

European Radiology 10/2018 Go to the issue