Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Chest

The relationship of cancer characteristics and patient outcome with time to lung cancer diagnosis after an abnormal screening CT

Authors: Sushilkumar K. Sonavane, Paul Pinsky, Jubal Watts Jr, David S. Gierada, Reginald Munden, Satinder P. Singh, Hrudaya Nath

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated a reduction in lung cancer and all-cause mortality with low-dose CT (LDCT) screening. The aim of our study was to examine the time to diagnosis (TTD) of lung cancer in the LDCT arm of the NLST and assess its relationship with cancer characteristics and survival.

Methods

The subjects (N = 462) with a positive baseline screen and subsequent lung cancer diagnosis within 3 years were evaluated by data and image review to confirm the baseline abnormality. The cases were analysed for the relationship between TTD and imaging features, cancer type, stage and survival for 7 years from baseline screen.

Results

Cancer was judged to be present at baseline in 397/462 cases. The factors that showed significant association (p value trend less than 0.05) with longer TTD included smaller nodule size, pure ground glass nodules (GGNs), smooth/lobulated margins, stages I/II, adenocarcinoma, and decreasing lung cancer mortality. The logistic regression model for lung cancer death showed significant inverse relationships with size less than 20 mm (OR = 0.32), pure GGNs (OR = 0.24), adenocarcinoma (OR = 0.57) and direct relationship with age (OR = 1.4).

Conclusion

TTD after a positive LDCT screen in the NLST showed a strong association with imaging features, stage and mortality.

Key Points

NLST observed variable time to lung cancer diagnosis from positive baseline screen.
Time to diagnosis was associated with imaging features, cancer type and stage.
In univariate but not multivariate analysis, longer TTD correlated with decreased mortality.
Literature
3.
go back to reference National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253CrossRefPubMedCentral National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Olsson JK, Schultz EM, Gould MK (2009) Timeliness of care in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review. Thorax 64:749–756CrossRefPubMed Olsson JK, Schultz EM, Gould MK (2009) Timeliness of care in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review. Thorax 64:749–756CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koyi H, Hillerdal G, Brandén E (2002) Patient’s and doctors’ delays in the diagnosis of chest tumors. Lung Cancer 35:53–57CrossRefPubMed Koyi H, Hillerdal G, Brandén E (2002) Patient’s and doctors’ delays in the diagnosis of chest tumors. Lung Cancer 35:53–57CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Porta M, Gallén M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of ‘diagnostic delay’ upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Porta M, Gallén M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of ‘diagnostic delay’ upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Pita-Fernández S, Montero-Martinez C, Pértega-Diaz S, Verea-Hernando H (2003) Relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 56:820–825CrossRefPubMed Pita-Fernández S, Montero-Martinez C, Pértega-Diaz S, Verea-Hernando H (2003) Relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 56:820–825CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Salomaa ER, Sällinen S, Hiekkanen H, Liippo K (2005) Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Chest 128:2282–2288CrossRefPubMed Salomaa ER, Sällinen S, Hiekkanen H, Liippo K (2005) Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Chest 128:2282–2288CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kanashiki M, Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Yamashita YT, Ohtsuka M, Sekizawa K (2003) Time from finding abnormality on mass screening to final diagnosis of lung cancer. Oncol Rep 10:649–652PubMed Kanashiki M, Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Yamashita YT, Ohtsuka M, Sekizawa K (2003) Time from finding abnormality on mass screening to final diagnosis of lung cancer. Oncol Rep 10:649–652PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kashiwabara K, Koshi S, Itonaga K, Nakahara O, Tanaka M, Toyonaga M (2003) Outcome in patients with lung cancer found on lung cancer mass screening roentgenograms, but who did not subsequently consult a doctor. Lung Cancer 40:67–72CrossRefPubMed Kashiwabara K, Koshi S, Itonaga K, Nakahara O, Tanaka M, Toyonaga M (2003) Outcome in patients with lung cancer found on lung cancer mass screening roentgenograms, but who did not subsequently consult a doctor. Lung Cancer 40:67–72CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tørring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Vedsted P (2013) Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer 49:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed Tørring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Vedsted P (2013) Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer 49:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Myrdal G, Lambe M, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K, Agustsson T, Ståhle E (2004) Effect of delays on prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 59:45–49PubMedPubMedCentral Myrdal G, Lambe M, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K, Agustsson T, Ståhle E (2004) Effect of delays on prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 59:45–49PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Comber H, Cronin DP, Deady S, Lorcain PO, Riordan P (2005) Delays in treatment in the cancer services: impact on cancer stage and survival. Ir Med J 98:238–299PubMed Comber H, Cronin DP, Deady S, Lorcain PO, Riordan P (2005) Delays in treatment in the cancer services: impact on cancer stage and survival. Ir Med J 98:238–299PubMed
16.
go back to reference Annakkaya AN, Arbak P, Balbay O, Bilgin C, Erbas M, Bulut I (2007) Effect of symptom-to-treatment interval on prognosis in lung cancer. Tumori 93:61–67PubMed Annakkaya AN, Arbak P, Balbay O, Bilgin C, Erbas M, Bulut I (2007) Effect of symptom-to-treatment interval on prognosis in lung cancer. Tumori 93:61–67PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H et al (2001) Prognostic value of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer 33:17–25CrossRefPubMed Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H et al (2001) Prognostic value of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer 33:17–25CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference ELCAP Group, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057CrossRef ELCAP Group, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E et al (2009) Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 64:148–154CrossRefPubMed Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E et al (2009) Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 64:148–154CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Heyneman LE, Patz EF (2002) PET imaging in patients with bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer 38:261–266CrossRefPubMed Heyneman LE, Patz EF (2002) PET imaging in patients with bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer 38:261–266CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wu HB, Wang L, Wang QS et al (2015) Adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as the nonsolid nodule is prone to be false-negative on 18 F-FDGPET/CT. Biomed Res Int 2015:243681PubMedPubMedCentral Wu HB, Wang L, Wang QS et al (2015) Adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as the nonsolid nodule is prone to be false-negative on 18 F-FDGPET/CT. Biomed Res Int 2015:243681PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH et al (2013) Natural history of pure ground glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest 143:172–178CrossRefPubMed Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH et al (2013) Natural history of pure ground glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest 143:172–178CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Hu M et al (2016) Lung cancer deaths in the National Lung Screening Trial attributed to nonsolid nodules. Radiology 281:589–596CrossRefPubMed Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Hu M et al (2016) Lung cancer deaths in the National Lung Screening Trial attributed to nonsolid nodules. Radiology 281:589–596CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659 MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2017161659
25.
go back to reference Guideline Development Group, Baldwin DR, Callister ME (2015) The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 70:794–798CrossRef Guideline Development Group, Baldwin DR, Callister ME (2015) The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 70:794–798CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lung-RADS™ Version 1.0 Assessment Categories. Release date April 28, 2014 Lung-RADS™ Version 1.0 Assessment Categories. Release date April 28, 2014
Metadata
Title
The relationship of cancer characteristics and patient outcome with time to lung cancer diagnosis after an abnormal screening CT
Authors
Sushilkumar K. Sonavane
Paul Pinsky
Jubal Watts Jr
David S. Gierada
Reginald Munden
Satinder P. Singh
Hrudaya Nath
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4886-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

European Radiology 12/2017 Go to the issue