Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2017

Open Access 01-11-2017 | Urogenital

MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial

Authors: Francesco Giganti, Caroline M. Moore, Nicola L. Robertson, Neil McCartan, Charles Jameson, Simon R. J. Bott, Mathias Winkler, Giulio Gambarota, Brandon Whitcher, Ramiro Castro, Mark Emberton, Clare Allen, Alex Kirkham

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo.

Methods

We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.

Results

A decrease in mean conspicuity in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54 vs 1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and conspicuity were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03 vs 0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11 vs –0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).

Conclusions

Dutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced conspicuity. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer.

Key points

Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI-visible prostate cancers.
Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI.
A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Nickel JC, Hoefner K, Andriole G, ARIA3001 ARIA3002 and ARIA3003 Study Investigators (2002) Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 60:434–441CrossRef Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Nickel JC, Hoefner K, Andriole G, ARIA3001 ARIA3002 and ARIA3003 Study Investigators (2002) Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 60:434–441CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW et al (2010) Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1192–1202CrossRef Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW et al (2010) Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1192–1202CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fleshner E, Lucia MS, Egerdie B et al (2012) Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 379:1103–1111CrossRef Fleshner E, Lucia MS, Egerdie B et al (2012) Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 379:1103–1111CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schröder F, Bangma C, Angulo JC et al (2013) Dutasteride treatment over 2 years delays prostate-specific antigen progression in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy for prostate cancer: results from the randomised, placebo-controlled Avodart After Radical Therapy for Prostate Cancer Study (ARTS). Eur Urol 63:779–787CrossRef Schröder F, Bangma C, Angulo JC et al (2013) Dutasteride treatment over 2 years delays prostate-specific antigen progression in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy for prostate cancer: results from the randomised, placebo-controlled Avodart After Radical Therapy for Prostate Cancer Study (ARTS). Eur Urol 63:779–787CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Klotz L, Nabid A, Higano C, Ryanm C, Kebabdjian M, Chin J (2014) Effect of dutasteride in men receiving intermittent androgen ablation therapy: The AVIAS trial. Can Urol Assoc J 8:E789–E794CrossRef Klotz L, Nabid A, Higano C, Ryanm C, Kebabdjian M, Chin J (2014) Effect of dutasteride in men receiving intermittent androgen ablation therapy: The AVIAS trial. Can Urol Assoc J 8:E789–E794CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marks LS, Roehrborn CG, Wolford E, Wilson TH (2007) The effect of dutasteride on the peripheral and transition zones of the prostate and the value of the transition zone index in predicting treatment response. J Urol 177:1408–1413CrossRef Marks LS, Roehrborn CG, Wolford E, Wilson TH (2007) The effect of dutasteride on the peripheral and transition zones of the prostate and the value of the transition zone index in predicting treatment response. J Urol 177:1408–1413CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Robertson NL, Moore CM, Ambler G et al (2013) MAPPED study design: A 6 month randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume using magnetic resonance imaging. Contemp Clin Trials 34:80–89CrossRef Robertson NL, Moore CM, Ambler G et al (2013) MAPPED study design: A 6 month randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume using magnetic resonance imaging. Contemp Clin Trials 34:80–89CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRef Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22:746–757CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al (2016) PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40 Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al (2016) PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40
11.
go back to reference Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group. Eur Urol 64:544–552CrossRef Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group. Eur Urol 64:544–552CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bjurlin MA, Mendhiratta N, Wysock JS, Taneja SS (2016) Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment. Cent Eur J Urol 69:9–18CrossRef Bjurlin MA, Mendhiratta N, Wysock JS, Taneja SS (2016) Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment. Cent Eur J Urol 69:9–18CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125CrossRef Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ickzkowski KA, Qiu J, Qian J et al (2005) The dual 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride induces atrophic changes and decreases relative cancer volume in human prostate. Urology 65:76–82CrossRef Ickzkowski KA, Qiu J, Qian J et al (2005) The dual 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride induces atrophic changes and decreases relative cancer volume in human prostate. Urology 65:76–82CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kauppinen RA (2002) Monitoring cytotoxic tumor treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 15:6–17CrossRef Kauppinen RA (2002) Monitoring cytotoxic tumor treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 15:6–17CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Roznovanu SL, Rădulescu D, Novac C, Stolnicu S (2005) The morphologic changes induced by hormone and radiation therapy on prostate carcinoma. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 109:337–342PubMed Roznovanu SL, Rădulescu D, Novac C, Stolnicu S (2005) The morphologic changes induced by hormone and radiation therapy on prostate carcinoma. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 109:337–342PubMed
17.
go back to reference Desouza NM, Riches SF, Van As NJ et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 63:774–782CrossRef Desouza NM, Riches SF, Van As NJ et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 63:774–782CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Van As NJ, de Souza NM, Riches SF, Morgan VA, Sohaib SA, Dearnaley DP et al (2009) A study of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance. Eur Urol 56:981–987CrossRef Van As NJ, de Souza NM, Riches SF, Morgan VA, Sohaib SA, Dearnaley DP et al (2009) A study of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance. Eur Urol 56:981–987CrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial
Authors
Francesco Giganti
Caroline M. Moore
Nicola L. Robertson
Neil McCartan
Charles Jameson
Simon R. J. Bott
Mathias Winkler
Giulio Gambarota
Brandon Whitcher
Ramiro Castro
Mark Emberton
Clare Allen
Alex Kirkham
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

European Radiology 11/2017 Go to the issue