Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Neuro

The value of qualitative and quantitative assessment of lesion to cerebral cortex signal ratio on double inversion recovery sequence in the differentiation of demyelinating plaques from non-specific T2 hyperintensities

Authors: Salih Hamcan, Bilal Battal, Veysel Akgun, Oguzhan Oz, Yalcin Bozkurt, Serdar Tasdemir, Sebahattin Sari, Mustafa Tasar

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the usefulness of the visual assessment and to determine diagnostic value of the lesion-to-cerebral cortex signal ratio (LCSR) measurement in the differentiation of demyelinating plaques and non-specific T2 hyperintensities on double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence.

Material and methods

DIR and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences of 25 clinically diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 25 non-MS patients with non-specific T2-hyperintense lesions were evaluated visually and LCSRs were measured by two observers independently.

Results

On DIR sequence, the calculated mean LCSR ± SD for demyelinating plaques and non-specific T2-hyperintense lesions were 1.60 ± 0.26 and 0.75 ± 0.19 for observer1, and 1.61 ± 0.27 and 0.74 ± 0.19 for observer2. LCSRs of demyelinating plaques were significantly higher than other non-specific T2-hyperintense lesions on DIR sequence. By using the visual assessment demyelinating plaques were differentiated from non-specific T2-hyperintensities with 92.8 % sensitivity, 97.5 % specificity and 95.1 % accuracy for observer1 and 92.8 % sensitivity, 95 % specificity and 93.9 % accuracy for observer2.

Conclusion

Visual assessment and LCSR measurement on DIR sequence seems to be useful for differentiating demyelinating MS plaques from supratentorial non-specific T2 hyperintensities. This feature can be used for diagnosis of MS particularly in patients with only supratentorial T2-hyperintense lesions who are categorized as radiologically possible MS.

Key Points

Demyelinating plaques and non-specific T2-hyperintensities have different SI on DIR images.
These differences can be assessed by LCSR measurement or visual assessment.
There is an excellent inter-observer agreement for both methods.
This feature can be used in radiologically possible MS cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lebrun C, Cohen M, Chaussenot A et al (2014) A prospective study of patients with brain MRI showing incidental T2 hyperintensities addressed as multiple sclerosis: a lot of work to do before treating. Neurol Ther 3:123–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lebrun C, Cohen M, Chaussenot A et al (2014) A prospective study of patients with brain MRI showing incidental T2 hyperintensities addressed as multiple sclerosis: a lot of work to do before treating. Neurol Ther 3:123–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Debette S, Markus HS (2010) The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c3666CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Debette S, Markus HS (2010) The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c3666CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Yoshita M, Fletcher E, DeCarli C (2005) Current concepts of analysis of cerebral white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 16:399–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoshita M, Fletcher E, DeCarli C (2005) Current concepts of analysis of cerebral white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 16:399–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Selchen D, Bhan V, Blevins G et al (2012) MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary. Neurology 79:S1–S15CrossRefPubMed Selchen D, Bhan V, Blevins G et al (2012) MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary. Neurology 79:S1–S15CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bedell BJ, Narayana PA (1998) Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:544–547CrossRefPubMed Bedell BJ, Narayana PA (1998) Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:544–547CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Geurts JJ, Pouwels PJ, Uitdehaag BM et al (2005) Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 236:254–260CrossRefPubMed Geurts JJ, Pouwels PJ, Uitdehaag BM et al (2005) Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 236:254–260CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Bankier AA et al (1998) Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 16:127–135CrossRefPubMed Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Bankier AA et al (1998) Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 16:127–135CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wattjes MP, Lutterbey GG, Gieseke J et al (2007) Double inversion recovery brain imaging at 3T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:54–59CrossRefPubMed Wattjes MP, Lutterbey GG, Gieseke J et al (2007) Double inversion recovery brain imaging at 3T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:54–59CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nelson F, Poonawalla AH, Hou P et al (2007) Improved identification of intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with phase-sensitive inversion recovery in combination with fast double inversion recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1645–1649CrossRefPubMed Nelson F, Poonawalla AH, Hou P et al (2007) Improved identification of intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with phase-sensitive inversion recovery in combination with fast double inversion recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1645–1649CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wardlaw JM, Smith C, Dichgans M (2013) Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 12:483–497CrossRefPubMed Wardlaw JM, Smith C, Dichgans M (2013) Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 12:483–497CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Frohman EM, Racke MK, Raine CS (2006) Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis. N Engl J Med 354:942–955CrossRefPubMed Frohman EM, Racke MK, Raine CS (2006) Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis. N Engl J Med 354:942–955CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Greenfield JG, Love S, Louis DN, Ellison D (2008) Greenfield's neuropathology, 8th edn. Hodder Arnold, London Greenfield JG, Love S, Louis DN, Ellison D (2008) Greenfield's neuropathology, 8th edn. Hodder Arnold, London
Metadata
Title
The value of qualitative and quantitative assessment of lesion to cerebral cortex signal ratio on double inversion recovery sequence in the differentiation of demyelinating plaques from non-specific T2 hyperintensities
Authors
Salih Hamcan
Bilal Battal
Veysel Akgun
Oguzhan Oz
Yalcin Bozkurt
Serdar Tasdemir
Sebahattin Sari
Mustafa Tasar
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4379-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

European Radiology 2/2017 Go to the issue