Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2016

Open Access 01-08-2016 | Gastrointestinal

Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial

Authors: Charlotte J. Tutein Nolthenius, Thierry N. Boellaard, Margriet C. de Haan, C. Yung Nio, Maarten G. J. Thomeer, Shandra Bipat, Alexander D. Montauban van Swijndregt, Marc J. van de Vijver, Katharina Biermann, Ernst J. Kuipers, Evelien Dekker, Jaap Stoker

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is a viable option for 6-9 mm polyps at CTC screening for colorectal cancer. We established participation and diagnostic yield of surveillance and determined overall yield of CTC screening.

Material and methods

In an invitational CTC screening trial 82 of 982 participants harboured 6-9 mm polyps as the largest lesion(s) for which surveillance CTC was advised. Only participants with one or more lesion(s) ≥6 mm at surveillance CTC were offered colonoscopy (OC); 13 had undergone preliminary OC. The surveillance CTC yield was defined as the number of participants with advanced neoplasia in the 82 surveillance participants, and was added to the primary screening yield.

Results

Sixty-five of 82 participants were eligible for surveillance CTC of which 56 (86.2 %) participated. Advanced neoplasia was diagnosed in 15/56 participants (26.8 %) and 9/13 (69.2 %) with preliminary OC. Total surveillance yield was 24/82 (29.3 %). No carcinomas were detected. Adding surveillance results to initial screening CTC yield significantly increased the advanced neoplasia yield per 100 CTC participants (6.1 to 8.6; p < 0.001) and per 100 invitees (2.1 to 2.9; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps has a substantial yield of advanced adenomas and significantly increased the CTC yield in population screening.

Key Points

The participation rate in surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is 86 %.
Advanced adenoma prevalence in a 6-9 mm CTC surveillance population is high.
Surveillance CTC significantly increases the yield of population screening by CTC.
Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps is a safe strategy.
Surveillance CTC is unlikely to yield new important extracolonic findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G (2008) Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135:1100–1105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G (2008) Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135:1100–1105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ (2013) Management of subcentimetric polyps detected by CT colonography. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:119–124CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ (2013) Management of subcentimetric polyps detected by CT colonography. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:119–124CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ (2007) Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:940–944CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ (2007) Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:940–944CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O et al (2015) Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol 25:331–345CrossRefPubMed Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O et al (2015) Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol 25:331–345CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR et al (2012) Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:55–64CrossRefPubMed Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR et al (2012) Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:55–64CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9CrossRefPubMed Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM et al (2010) Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 10:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM et al (2010) Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 10:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Liedenbaum MH, Denters MJ, Zijta FM et al (2011) Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance. Clin Radiol 66:30–37CrossRefPubMed Liedenbaum MH, Denters MJ, Zijta FM et al (2011) Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance. Clin Radiol 66:30–37CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS (2006) Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:343–348CrossRefPubMed Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS (2006) Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:343–348CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:873–885PubMed Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:873–885PubMed
16.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2002) The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 12:1–9CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2002) The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 12:1–9CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer M et al (2012) Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography. Radiology 264:771–778CrossRefPubMed de Haan MC, Nio CY, Thomeer M et al (2012) Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography. Radiology 264:771–778CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD et al (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14:711–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD et al (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14:711–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al (1996) Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 39:449–456CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al (1996) Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 39:449–456CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Ginnerup Pedersen B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TE, Laurberg S (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 52:1744–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ginnerup Pedersen B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TE, Laurberg S (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 52:1744–1747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916CrossRefPubMed Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al (2005) Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 236:519–526CrossRefPubMed Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al (2005) Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 236:519–526CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J, Kim DC, Megibow AJ, Babb JS (2011) CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging, and polyp prevalence. Radiology 259:767–774CrossRefPubMed Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J, Kim DC, Megibow AJ, Babb JS (2011) CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging, and polyp prevalence. Radiology 259:767–774CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Wise SM, Kim DH (2010) Positive predictive value for polyps detected at screening CT colonography. Eur Radiol 20:1651–1656CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Wise SM, Kim DH (2010) Positive predictive value for polyps detected at screening CT colonography. Eur Radiol 20:1651–1656CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Huang CS, Farraye FA, Yang S, O'Brien MJ (2011) The clinical significance of serrated polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 106:229–240, quiz 241CrossRefPubMed Huang CS, Farraye FA, Yang S, O'Brien MJ (2011) The clinical significance of serrated polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 106:229–240, quiz 241CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jass JR (2007) Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 50:113–130CrossRefPubMed Jass JR (2007) Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 50:113–130CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2009) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:40–46CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2009) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:40–46CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial
Authors
Charlotte J. Tutein Nolthenius
Thierry N. Boellaard
Margriet C. de Haan
C. Yung Nio
Maarten G. J. Thomeer
Shandra Bipat
Alexander D. Montauban van Swijndregt
Marc J. van de Vijver
Katharina Biermann
Ernst J. Kuipers
Evelien Dekker
Jaap Stoker
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4081-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

European Radiology 8/2016 Go to the issue