Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Breast

Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study

Authors: Thomas Knogler, Peter Homolka, Mathias Hörnig, Robert Leithner, Georg Langs, Martin Waitzbauer, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Sabine Leitner, Thomas H. Helbich

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To demonstrate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography (CEDEM) using titanium (Ti) filtering at 49 kVp for high-energy images and a novel artefact reducing image-subtraction post-processing algorithm.

Methods

Fifteen patients with suspicious findings (ACR BI-RADS 4 and 5) detected with digital mammography (MG) that required biopsy were included. CEDEM examinations were performed on a modified prototype machine. Acquired HE and low-energy raw data images were registered non-rigidly to compensate for possible subtle tissue motion. Subtracted CEDEM images were generated via weighted subtraction, using a fully automatic, locally adjusted tissue thickness-dependent subtraction factor to avoid over-subtraction at the breast border. Two observers evaluated the MG and CEDEM images according to ACR BI-RADS in two reading sessions. Results were correlated with histopathology.

Results

Seven patients with benign and eight with malignant findings were included. All malignant lesions showed a strong contrast enhancement. BI-RADS assessment was altered in 66.6 % through the addition of CEDEM, resulting in increased overall accuracy. With CEDEM, additional lesions were depicted and false-positive rate was reduced compared to MG.

Conclusions

CEDEM using Ti filtering with 49 kVp for HE exposures is feasible in a clinical setting. The proposed image-processing algorithm has the potential to reduce artefacts and improve CEDEM images.

Key Points

CEDEM with a titanium filter is feasible in a clinical setting.
Breast thickness-dependent image subtraction has the potential to improve CEDEM images.
The proposed image-processing algorithm reduces artefacts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S et al (2011) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 78:112–121CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S et al (2011) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 78:112–121CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Garbay JR, Delaloge S (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69:34–42CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Garbay JR, Delaloge S (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69:34–42CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F et al (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res BCR 14:R94CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F et al (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res BCR 14:R94CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842–850CrossRefPubMed Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842–850CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ (2003) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229:261–268CrossRefPubMed Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ (2003) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229:261–268CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral Contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: Feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266:743–751CrossRefPubMed Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral Contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: Feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266:743–751CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F, Muller S, Hamm B, Bick U (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 40:397–404CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F, Muller S, Hamm B, Bick U (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 40:397–404CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Diekmann F, Bick U (2007) Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol 17:3086–3092CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Bick U (2007) Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol 17:3086–3092CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hörnig MD, Bätz T, Mertelmeier T (2012) Design of a contrast-enhanced dual-energy tomosynthesis system for breast cancer imaging. Proc SPIE 8313, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging 8313 Hörnig MD, Bätz T, Mertelmeier T (2012) Design of a contrast-enhanced dual-energy tomosynthesis system for breast cancer imaging. Proc SPIE 8313, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging 8313
10.
go back to reference Yaffe M (2000) Digital Mammography. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL (eds) Handbook of Medical Imaging. SPIE Press, Bellingham Yaffe M (2000) Digital Mammography. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL (eds) Handbook of Medical Imaging. SPIE Press, Bellingham
11.
go back to reference Bernhardt P, Mertelmeier T, Hoheisel M (2006) X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. Med Phys 33:4337–4349CrossRefPubMed Bernhardt P, Mertelmeier T, Hoheisel M (2006) X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. Med Phys 33:4337–4349CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Samei E, Saunders RS (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality. Phys Med Biol 56:6359–6378CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samei E, Saunders RS (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality. Phys Med Biol 56:6359–6378CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Diekmann F, Sommer A, Lawaczeck R et al (2007) Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents. Invest Radiol 42:319–325CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Sommer A, Lawaczeck R et al (2007) Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents. Invest Radiol 42:319–325CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Carton AK, Gavenonis SC, Currivan JA, Conant EF, Schnall MD, Maidment AD (2010) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis—a feasibility study. Br J Radiol 83:344–350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carton AK, Gavenonis SC, Currivan JA, Conant EF, Schnall MD, Maidment AD (2010) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis—a feasibility study. Br J Radiol 83:344–350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 34:208–219CrossRefPubMed Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 34:208–219CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rosado-Mendez I, Palma BA, Brandan ME (2008) Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit. Med Phys 35:5544–5557CrossRefPubMed Rosado-Mendez I, Palma BA, Brandan ME (2008) Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit. Med Phys 35:5544–5557CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721CrossRefPubMed Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carton AK, Ullberg C, Lindman K, Acciavatti R, Francke T, Maidment AD (2010) Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model. Med Phys 37:5896–5907CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carton AK, Ullberg C, Lindman K, Acciavatti R, Francke T, Maidment AD (2010) Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model. Med Phys 37:5896–5907CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I, European Society of Breast I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581–588CrossRefPubMed Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I, European Society of Breast I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581–588CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pollard BJ, Samei E, Chawla AS et al (2009) The influence of increased ambient lighting on mass detection in mammograms. Acad Radiol 16:299–304CrossRefPubMed Pollard BJ, Samei E, Chawla AS et al (2009) The influence of increased ambient lighting on mass detection in mammograms. Acad Radiol 16:299–304CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (2013) ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA (2013) ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston
22.
go back to reference Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK et al (2002) Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 29:2419–2426CrossRefPubMed Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK et al (2002) Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 29:2419–2426CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Leithner R, Knogler T, Homolka P (2013) Development and production of a prototype iodine contrast phantom for CEDEM. Phys Med Biol 58:N25–35CrossRefPubMed Leithner R, Knogler T, Homolka P (2013) Development and production of a prototype iodine contrast phantom for CEDEM. Phys Med Biol 58:N25–35CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S et al (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W528–537CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S et al (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W528–537CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study
Authors
Thomas Knogler
Peter Homolka
Mathias Hörnig
Robert Leithner
Georg Langs
Martin Waitzbauer
Katja Pinker-Domenig
Sabine Leitner
Thomas H. Helbich
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4007-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

European Radiology 6/2016 Go to the issue