Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2015

Open Access 01-09-2015 | Special Report

ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening

Authors: Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Lorenzo Bonomo, Mina Gaga, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Nir Peled, Mathias Prokop, Martine Remy-Jardin, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Jean-Paul Sculier, on behalf of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most frequently fatal cancer, with poor survival once the disease is advanced. Annual low-dose computed tomography has shown a survival benefit in screening individuals at high risk for lung cancer. Based on the available evidence, the European Society of Radiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend lung cancer screening in comprehensive, quality-assured, longitudinal programmes within a clinical trial or in routine clinical practice at certified multidisciplinary medical centres. Minimum requirements include: standardised operating procedures for low-dose image acquisition, computer-assisted nodule evaluation, and positive screening results and their management; inclusion/exclusion criteria; expectation management; and smoking cessation programmes. Further refinements are recommended to increase quality, outcome and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening: inclusion of risk models, reduction of effective radiation dose, computer-assisted volumetric measurements and assessment of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vascular calcification). All these requirements should be adjusted to the regional infrastructure and healthcare system, in order to exactly define eligibility using a risk model, nodule management and a quality assurance plan. The establishment of a central registry, including a biobank and an image bank, and preferably on a European level, is strongly encouraged.

Key points

Lung cancer screening using low dose computed tomography reduces mortality.
Leading US medical societies recommend large scale screening for high-risk individuals.
There are no lung cancer screening recommendations or reimbursed screening programmes in Europe as of yet.
The European Society of Radiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend lung cancer screening within a clinical trial or in routine clinical practice at certified multidisciplinary medical centres.
High risk, eligible individuals should be enrolled in comprehensive, quality-controlled longitudinal programmes.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K et al (2007) The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2:706–714PubMedCrossRef Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K et al (2007) The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2:706–714PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shi CL, Zhang XY, Han BH et al (2011) A clinicopathological study of resected non-small cell lung cancers 2 cm or less in diameter: a prognostic assessment. Med Oncol 28:1441–1446PubMedCrossRef Shi CL, Zhang XY, Han BH et al (2011) A clinicopathological study of resected non-small cell lung cancers 2 cm or less in diameter: a prognostic assessment. Med Oncol 28:1441–1446PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shlomi D, Ben-Avi R, Balmor GR et al (2014) Screening for lung cancer: time for large-scale screening by chest computed tomography. Eur Respir J 44:217–238PubMedCrossRef Shlomi D, Ben-Avi R, Balmor GR et al (2014) Screening for lung cancer: time for large-scale screening by chest computed tomography. Eur Respir J 44:217–238PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRef Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G et al (2013) The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer 119:3976–3983PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G et al (2013) The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer 119:3976–3983PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al (2007) Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 120:868–874PubMedCrossRef van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al (2007) Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 120:868–874PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saghir Z, Dirksen A, Ashraf H et al (2012) CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax 67:296–301PubMedCrossRef Saghir Z, Dirksen A, Ashraf H et al (2012) CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax 67:296–301PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V et al (2012) Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur J Cancer Prev 21:308–315PubMedCrossRef Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V et al (2012) Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur J Cancer Prev 21:308–315PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Baldwin DR, Duffy SW, Wald NJ et al (2011) UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Thorax 66:308–313PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Baldwin DR, Duffy SW, Wald NJ et al (2011) UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Thorax 66:308–313PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Becker N, Motsch E, Gross ML et al (2012) Randomized study on early detection of lung cancer with MSCT in Germany: study design and results of the first screening round. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:1475–1486PubMedCrossRef Becker N, Motsch E, Gross ML et al (2012) Randomized study on early detection of lung cancer with MSCT in Germany: study design and results of the first screening round. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:1475–1486PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS et al (2012) Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10:240–265PubMed Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS et al (2012) Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10:240–265PubMed
16.
go back to reference Wood DE, Kazerooni E, Baum SL et al (2015) Lung cancer screening, version 1. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13:23–34PubMed Wood DE, Kazerooni E, Baum SL et al (2015) Lung cancer screening, version 1. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13:23–34PubMed
17.
go back to reference Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA et al (2011) Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA 306:1865–1873PubMedCrossRef Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA et al (2011) Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA 306:1865–1873PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH et al (2012) The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:33–38PubMedCrossRef Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH et al (2012) The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:33–38PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Detterbeck FC, Mazzone PJ, Naidich DP et al (2013) Screening for lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:e78S–e92SPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Detterbeck FC, Mazzone PJ, Naidich DP et al (2013) Screening for lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:e78S–e92SPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Detterbeck FC, Lewis SZ, Diekemper R et al (2013) Executive summary: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:7S–37SPubMedCrossRef Detterbeck FC, Lewis SZ, Diekemper R et al (2013) Executive summary: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:7S–37SPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Moyer VA (2014) Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160:330–338PubMed Moyer VA (2014) Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 160:330–338PubMed
28.
go back to reference Simonato L, Agudo A, Ahrens W et al (2001) Lung cancer and cigarette smoking in Europe: an update of risk estimates and an assessment of inter-country heterogeneity. Int J Cancer 91:876–887PubMedCrossRef Simonato L, Agudo A, Ahrens W et al (2001) Lung cancer and cigarette smoking in Europe: an update of risk estimates and an assessment of inter-country heterogeneity. Int J Cancer 91:876–887PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Department US (1990) of Health and Human Services. From the Centers for Disease Control. Health benefits of smoking cessation. JAMA 264:1930 Department US (1990) of Health and Human Services. From the Centers for Disease Control. Health benefits of smoking cessation. JAMA 264:1930
30.
go back to reference Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM et al (2000) Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1308–1316PubMedCrossRef Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM et al (2000) Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1308–1316PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kubik AK, Parkin DM, Zatloukal P (2000) Czech Study on Lung Cancer Screening: post-trial follow-up of lung cancer deaths up to year 15 since enrollment. Cancer 89:2363–2368PubMedCrossRef Kubik AK, Parkin DM, Zatloukal P (2000) Czech Study on Lung Cancer Screening: post-trial follow-up of lung cancer deaths up to year 15 since enrollment. Cancer 89:2363–2368PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR et al (2013) Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 368:1980–1991PubMedCrossRef Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR et al (2013) Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 368:1980–1991PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR et al (2009) A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:445–453PubMedCrossRef Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR et al (2009) A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:445–453PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bach PB (2008) Overdiagnosis in lung cancer: different perspectives, definitions, implications. Thorax 63:298–300PubMedCrossRef Bach PB (2008) Overdiagnosis in lung cancer: different perspectives, definitions, implications. Thorax 63:298–300PubMedCrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Raji OY, Duffy SW, Agbaje OF et al (2012) Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a case-control and cohort validation study. Ann Intern Med 157:242–250PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Raji OY, Duffy SW, Agbaje OF et al (2012) Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a case-control and cohort validation study. Ann Intern Med 157:242–250PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD et al (2013) Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med 369:245–254PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD et al (2013) Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med 369:245–254PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference de Koning HJ, Meza R, Plevritis SK et al (2014) Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 160:311–320PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Koning HJ, Meza R, Plevritis SK et al (2014) Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 160:311–320PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference McCarthy WJ, Meza R, Jeon J et al (2012) Chapter 6: lung cancer in never smokers: epidemiology and risk prediction models. Risk Anal 32(suppl 1):S69–S84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McCarthy WJ, Meza R, Jeon J et al (2012) Chapter 6: lung cancer in never smokers: epidemiology and risk prediction models. Risk Anal 32(suppl 1):S69–S84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Yano T, Haro A, Shikada Y et al (2011) Non-small cell lung cancer in never smokers as a representative ‘non-smoking-associated lung cancer’: epidemiology and clinical features. Int J Clin Oncol 16:287–293PubMedCrossRef Yano T, Haro A, Shikada Y et al (2011) Non-small cell lung cancer in never smokers as a representative ‘non-smoking-associated lung cancer’: epidemiology and clinical features. Int J Clin Oncol 16:287–293PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H et al (2006) Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 54:177–184PubMedCrossRef Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H et al (2006) Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 54:177–184PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361:2221–2229PubMedCrossRef van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361:2221–2229PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference McKee BJ, Regis SM, McKee AB et al (2015) Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a Clinical CT Lung Screening Program. J Am Coll Radiol 12:273–276PubMedCrossRef McKee BJ, Regis SM, McKee AB et al (2015) Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a Clinical CT Lung Screening Program. J Am Coll Radiol 12:273–276PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Manos D, Seely JM, Taylor J et al (2014) The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:121–134PubMedCrossRef Manos D, Seely JM, Taylor J et al (2014) The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:121–134PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Field JK, Hansell DM, Duffy SW et al (2013) CT screening for lung cancer: countdown to implementation. Lancet Oncol 14:e591–e600PubMedCrossRef Field JK, Hansell DM, Duffy SW et al (2013) CT screening for lung cancer: countdown to implementation. Lancet Oncol 14:e591–e600PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Xu DM, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Oudkerk M et al (2009) Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology 250:264–272PubMedCrossRef Xu DM, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Oudkerk M et al (2009) Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology 250:264–272PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ahn MI, Gleeson TG, Chan IH et al (2010) Perifissural nodules seen at CT screening for lung cancer. Radiology 254:949–956PubMedCrossRef Ahn MI, Gleeson TG, Chan IH et al (2010) Perifissural nodules seen at CT screening for lung cancer. Radiology 254:949–956PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference van’t Westeinde SC, Horeweg N, Vernhout RM et al (2012) The role of conventional bronchoscopy in the workup of suspicious CT scan screen-detected pulmonary nodules. Chest 142:377–384CrossRef van’t Westeinde SC, Horeweg N, Vernhout RM et al (2012) The role of conventional bronchoscopy in the workup of suspicious CT scan screen-detected pulmonary nodules. Chest 142:377–384CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Prokop M (2014) Lung cancer screening: the radiologist’s perspective. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 35:91–98PubMedCrossRef Prokop M (2014) Lung cancer screening: the radiologist’s perspective. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 35:91–98PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Van’t Westeinde SC, Horeweg N, De Leyn P et al (2012) Complications following lung surgery in the Dutch-Belgian randomized lung cancer screening trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:420–429CrossRef Van’t Westeinde SC, Horeweg N, De Leyn P et al (2012) Complications following lung surgery in the Dutch-Belgian randomized lung cancer screening trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:420–429CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Marshall HM, Bowman RV, Yang IA et al (2013) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status. J Thorac Dis 5(suppl 5):S524–S539PubMedCentralPubMed Marshall HM, Bowman RV, Yang IA et al (2013) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a review of current status. J Thorac Dis 5(suppl 5):S524–S539PubMedCentralPubMed
53.
go back to reference Mulshine JL, D’Amico TA (2014) Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program. CA Cancer J Clin 64:352–363PubMedCrossRef Mulshine JL, D’Amico TA (2014) Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program. CA Cancer J Clin 64:352–363PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253PubMedCrossRef Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Cagnon CH, Cody DD, McNitt-Gray MF et al (2006) Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial. Acad Radiol 13:1431–1441PubMedCrossRef Cagnon CH, Cody DD, McNitt-Gray MF et al (2006) Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial. Acad Radiol 13:1431–1441PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 48:206–212PubMed Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 48:206–212PubMed
57.
go back to reference National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII. Washington, The National Academies Press, 2006. National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII. Washington, The National Academies Press, 2006.
58.
go back to reference Pierce DA, Sharp GB, Mabuchi K (2003) Joint effects of radiation and smoking on lung cancer risk among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 159:511–520PubMedCrossRef Pierce DA, Sharp GB, Mabuchi K (2003) Joint effects of radiation and smoking on lung cancer risk among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 159:511–520PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Furukawa K, Preston DL, Lonn S et al (2010) Radiation and smoking effects on lung cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 174:72–82PubMedCrossRef Furukawa K, Preston DL, Lonn S et al (2010) Radiation and smoking effects on lung cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 174:72–82PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Berg CD (2008) Low-dose lung computed tomography screening before age 55: estimates of the mortality reduction required to outweigh the radiation-induced cancer risk. J Med Screen 15:153–158PubMedCrossRef Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Berg CD (2008) Low-dose lung computed tomography screening before age 55: estimates of the mortality reduction required to outweigh the radiation-induced cancer risk. J Med Screen 15:153–158PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference McCunney RJ, Li J (2014) Radiation risks in lung cancer screening programs: a comparison with nuclear industry workers and atomic bomb survivors. Chest 145:618–624PubMedCrossRef McCunney RJ, Li J (2014) Radiation risks in lung cancer screening programs: a comparison with nuclear industry workers and atomic bomb survivors. Chest 145:618–624PubMedCrossRef
63.
64.
go back to reference Marshall D, Simpson KN, Earle CC et al (2001) Potential cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for lung cancer (LC) in a high risk cohort. Lung Cancer 32:227–236PubMedCrossRef Marshall D, Simpson KN, Earle CC et al (2001) Potential cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for lung cancer (LC) in a high risk cohort. Lung Cancer 32:227–236PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Wisnivesky JP, Mushlin AI, Sicherman N et al (2003) The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening. Chest 124:614–621PubMedCrossRef Wisnivesky JP, Mushlin AI, Sicherman N et al (2003) The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening. Chest 124:614–621PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Mahadevia PJ, Fleisher LA, Frick KD et al (2003) Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 289:313–322PubMedCrossRef Mahadevia PJ, Fleisher LA, Frick KD et al (2003) Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 289:313–322PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Manser R, Dalton A, Carter R et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting. Lung Cancer 48:171–185PubMedCrossRef Manser R, Dalton A, Carter R et al (2005) Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting. Lung Cancer 48:171–185PubMedCrossRef
68.
69.
go back to reference Folland SGA, Stano M (2010) Economic Effiencey and Cost-Benefit Analysis. The Economics of Health and Health Care. Prentice Hall, Boston Folland SGA, Stano M (2010) Economic Effiencey and Cost-Benefit Analysis. The Economics of Health and Health Care. Prentice Hall, Boston
70.
go back to reference Horeweg N, van der Aalst CM, Thunnissen E et al (2013) Characteristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screening in the randomized NELSON trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187:848–854PubMedCrossRef Horeweg N, van der Aalst CM, Thunnissen E et al (2013) Characteristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screening in the randomized NELSON trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187:848–854PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Devaraj A (2015) Missed cancers in lung cancer screening—more than meets the eye. Eur Radiol 25:89–91PubMedCrossRef Devaraj A (2015) Missed cancers in lung cancer screening—more than meets the eye. Eur Radiol 25:89–91PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG et al (2013) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187:347–365PubMedCrossRef Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG et al (2013) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187:347–365PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Masala S, Magrini A, Taglieri A et al (2014) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs): improvement of pulmonary function after percutaneous vertebroplasty (VTP). Eur Radiol 24:1577–1585PubMedCrossRef Masala S, Magrini A, Taglieri A et al (2014) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs): improvement of pulmonary function after percutaneous vertebroplasty (VTP). Eur Radiol 24:1577–1585PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H et al (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722PubMedCrossRef Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H et al (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Washko GR, Lynch DA, Matsuoka S et al (2010) Identification of early interstitial lung disease in smokers from the COPDGene Study. Acad Radiol 17:48–53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Washko GR, Lynch DA, Matsuoka S et al (2010) Identification of early interstitial lung disease in smokers from the COPDGene Study. Acad Radiol 17:48–53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Castaldi PJ (2013) San Jose Estepar R, et al. Distinct quantitative computed tomography emphysema patterns are associated with physiology and function in smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:1083–1090PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Castaldi PJ (2013) San Jose Estepar R, et al. Distinct quantitative computed tomography emphysema patterns are associated with physiology and function in smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:1083–1090PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Estepar RS, Kinney GL, Black-Shinn JL et al (2013) Computed tomographic measures of pulmonary vascular morphology in smokers and their clinical implications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:231–239PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Estepar RS, Kinney GL, Black-Shinn JL et al (2013) Computed tomographic measures of pulmonary vascular morphology in smokers and their clinical implications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:231–239PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Shemesh J, Henschke CI, Shaham D et al (2010) Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease. Radiology 257:541–548PubMedCrossRef Shemesh J, Henschke CI, Shaham D et al (2010) Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease. Radiology 257:541–548PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Kinney GL et al (2011) Coronary artery and thoracic calcium on noncontrast thoracic CT scans: comparison of ungated and gated examinations in patients from the COPD Gene cohort. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:113–118PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Kinney GL et al (2011) Coronary artery and thoracic calcium on noncontrast thoracic CT scans: comparison of ungated and gated examinations in patients from the COPD Gene cohort. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:113–118PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Mets OM, Vliegenthart R, Gondrie MJ et al (2013) Lung cancer screening CT-based prediction of cardiovascular events. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:899–907PubMedCrossRef Mets OM, Vliegenthart R, Gondrie MJ et al (2013) Lung cancer screening CT-based prediction of cardiovascular events. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:899–907PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Pecot CV, Li M, Zhang XJ et al (2012) Added value of a serum proteomic signature in the diagnostic evaluation of lung nodules. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:786–792PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pecot CV, Li M, Zhang XJ et al (2012) Added value of a serum proteomic signature in the diagnostic evaluation of lung nodules. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:786–792PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Daly S, Rinewalt D, Fhied C et al (2013) Development and validation of a plasma biomarker panel for discerning clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Oncol 8:31–36PubMedCrossRef Daly S, Rinewalt D, Fhied C et al (2013) Development and validation of a plasma biomarker panel for discerning clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Oncol 8:31–36PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Jett JR, Peek LJ, Fredericks L et al (2014) Audit of the autoantibody test, EarlyCDT(R)-lung, in 1600 patients: an evaluation of its performance in routine clinical practice. Lung Cancer 83:51–55PubMedCrossRef Jett JR, Peek LJ, Fredericks L et al (2014) Audit of the autoantibody test, EarlyCDT(R)-lung, in 1600 patients: an evaluation of its performance in routine clinical practice. Lung Cancer 83:51–55PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening
Authors
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Lorenzo Bonomo
Mina Gaga
Kristiaan Nackaerts
Nir Peled
Mathias Prokop
Martine Remy-Jardin
Oyunbileg von Stackelberg
Jean-Paul Sculier
on behalf of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3697-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

European Radiology 9/2015 Go to the issue