Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Subcentimeter hypervascular nodule with typical imaging findings of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with history of hepatocellular carcinoma: natural course on serial gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging

Authors: Kyoung Doo Song, Seong Hyun Kim, Hyo Keun Lim, Sin-Ho Jung, Insuk Sohn, Hyung Sik Kim

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the natural course of subcentimeter hypervascular nodules at high risk for developing into hepatocellular carcinomas (SHNHR) using serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

An SHNHR was defined as a subcentimeter hypervascular nodule having typical imaging findings of HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging. We included 39 patients with 46 SHNHRs (mean size ± standard deviation, 6.1 ± 1.6 mm; range, 3.2 – 9.0 mm). Overt HCC was defined as pathology proven HCC or a nodule larger than 1 cm with typical imaging findings of HCC. The cumulative rate and the independent predictive factors for progression to overt HCC were evaluated.

Results

The median follow-up period was 139 days (range, 64 – 392 days). The cumulative progression rate to overt HCC at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was 13.9 %, 61.7 %, 83.2 %, and 89.9 %. The initial size of SHNHR was a significant predictor of progression to overt HCC, with an optimal cut-off value of 5.5 mm.

Conclusion

The progression rate of SHNHR to overt HCC within 12 months was high (89.9 %) in patients with history of HCC. The initial size of SHNHR was an important predictor for progression to overt HCC.

Key Points

Most SHNHRs (89.9 %) progressed to overt HCCs within 12 months.
Initial size was an important predictor for progression to overt HCCs.
The optimal cut-off value for initial nodule size was 5.5 mm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J et al (2009) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1675–1681PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Kim SH, Lee J et al (2009) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus triple-phase MDCT for the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1675–1681PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim JE, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Rhim H (2011) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma 1 cm or smaller in patients with chronic liver disease: characterization with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI that includes diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W758–W765PubMedCrossRef Kim JE, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Rhim H (2011) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma 1 cm or smaller in patients with chronic liver disease: characterization with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI that includes diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W758–W765PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Park MJ, Kim YK, Lee MW et al (2012) Small hepatocellular carcinomas: improved sensitivity by combining gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging patterns. Radiology 264:761–770PubMedCrossRef Park MJ, Kim YK, Lee MW et al (2012) Small hepatocellular carcinomas: improved sensitivity by combining gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging patterns. Radiology 264:761–770PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Willatt JM, Hussain HK, Adusumilli S, Marrero JA (2008) MR Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: challenges and controversies. Radiology 247:311–330PubMedCrossRef Willatt JM, Hussain HK, Adusumilli S, Marrero JA (2008) MR Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: challenges and controversies. Radiology 247:311–330PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Minami M (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:438–444PubMedCrossRef Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Minami M (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:438–444PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C et al (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 47:97–104PubMedCrossRef Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C et al (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 47:97–104PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee EW, Wei LJ, Amato DA (1992) Cox-type regression analysis for large number of small groups of correlated failure time observations. In: Klein JP, Goel PK (eds) Survival analysis: state of the art. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 237–247CrossRef Lee EW, Wei LJ, Amato DA (1992) Cox-type regression analysis for large number of small groups of correlated failure time observations. In: Klein JP, Goel PK (eds) Survival analysis: state of the art. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 237–247CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS (2000) Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 56:337–344PubMedCrossRef Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS (2000) Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 56:337–344PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hwang SH, Yu JS, Kim KW, Kim JH, Chung JJ (2008) Small hypervascular enhancing lesions on arterial phase images of multiphase dynamic computed tomography in cirrhotic liver: fate and implications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:39–45PubMedCrossRef Hwang SH, Yu JS, Kim KW, Kim JH, Chung JJ (2008) Small hypervascular enhancing lesions on arterial phase images of multiphase dynamic computed tomography in cirrhotic liver: fate and implications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:39–45PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Byrnes V, Shi H, Kiryu S, Rofsky NM, Afdhal NH (2007) The clinical outcome of small (<20 mm) arterially enhancing nodules on MRI in the cirrhotic liver. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1654–1659PubMedCrossRef Byrnes V, Shi H, Kiryu S, Rofsky NM, Afdhal NH (2007) The clinical outcome of small (<20 mm) arterially enhancing nodules on MRI in the cirrhotic liver. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1654–1659PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Park MJ, Kim YS, Lee WJ, Lim HK, Rhim H, Lee J (2010) Outcomes of follow-up CT for small (5-10-mm) arterially enhancing nodules in the liver and risk factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma in a surveillance population. Eur Radiol 20:2397–2404PubMedCrossRef Park MJ, Kim YS, Lee WJ, Lim HK, Rhim H, Lee J (2010) Outcomes of follow-up CT for small (5-10-mm) arterially enhancing nodules in the liver and risk factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma in a surveillance population. Eur Radiol 20:2397–2404PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Guo L, Liang C, Yu T et al (2012) 3 T MRI of hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis: does T2-weighted imaging provide added value? Clin Radiol 67:319–328PubMedCrossRef Guo L, Liang C, Yu T et al (2012) 3 T MRI of hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis: does T2-weighted imaging provide added value? Clin Radiol 67:319–328PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wu LM, Xu JR, Lu Q, Hua J, Chen J, Hu J (2013) A pooled analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:227–234PubMedCrossRef Wu LM, Xu JR, Lu Q, Hua J, Chen J, Hu J (2013) A pooled analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:227–234PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Haimerl M, Wachtler M, Platzek I et al (2013) Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions. BMC Med Imaging 13:41PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Haimerl M, Wachtler M, Platzek I et al (2013) Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions. BMC Med Imaging 13:41PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barbara L, Benzi G, Gaiani S et al (1992) Natural history of small untreated hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of tumor growth rate and patient survival. Hepatology 16:132–137PubMedCrossRef Barbara L, Benzi G, Gaiani S et al (1992) Natural history of small untreated hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of tumor growth rate and patient survival. Hepatology 16:132–137PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kubota K, Ina H, Okada Y, Irie T (2003) Growth rate of primary single hepatocellular carcinoma: determining optimal screening interval with contrast enhanced computed tomography. Dig Dis Sci 48:581–586PubMedCrossRef Kubota K, Ina H, Okada Y, Irie T (2003) Growth rate of primary single hepatocellular carcinoma: determining optimal screening interval with contrast enhanced computed tomography. Dig Dis Sci 48:581–586PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Okazaki N, Yoshino M, Yoshida T et al (1989) Evaluation of the prognosis for small hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor volume doubling time. A preliminary report. Cancer 63:2207–2210PubMedCrossRef Okazaki N, Yoshino M, Yoshida T et al (1989) Evaluation of the prognosis for small hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor volume doubling time. A preliminary report. Cancer 63:2207–2210PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Park Y, Choi D, Lim HK et al (2008) Growth rate of new hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: evaluation with multiphase CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:215–220PubMedCrossRef Park Y, Choi D, Lim HK et al (2008) Growth rate of new hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: evaluation with multiphase CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:215–220PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Taouli B, Goh JS, Lu Y et al (2005) Growth rate of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with serial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:425–429PubMedCrossRef Taouli B, Goh JS, Lu Y et al (2005) Growth rate of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with serial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:425–429PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sheu JC, Sung JL, Chen DS et al (1985) Growth rate of asymptomatic hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical implications. Gastroenterology 89:259–266PubMed Sheu JC, Sung JL, Chen DS et al (1985) Growth rate of asymptomatic hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical implications. Gastroenterology 89:259–266PubMed
24.
go back to reference Takayasu K, Arii S, Sakamoto M et al (2013) Clinical implication of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma studied in 4,474 patients with solitary tumour equal or less than 3 cm. Liver Int 33:762–770PubMedCrossRef Takayasu K, Arii S, Sakamoto M et al (2013) Clinical implication of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma studied in 4,474 patients with solitary tumour equal or less than 3 cm. Liver Int 33:762–770PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Subcentimeter hypervascular nodule with typical imaging findings of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with history of hepatocellular carcinoma: natural course on serial gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging
Authors
Kyoung Doo Song
Seong Hyun Kim
Hyo Keun Lim
Sin-Ho Jung
Insuk Sohn
Hyung Sik Kim
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3680-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

European Radiology 9/2015 Go to the issue