Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Radiological Education

Evaluation of the contribution of radiological imaging to the final diagnosis in medical case reports

Authors: Isabel Wiesinger, Gregor Scharf, Natascha Platz, Lena M. Dendl, Michael T. Pawlik, Christian Stroszczynski, Andreas G. Schreyer

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical value and impact of radiological imaging in published medial case reports.

Methods

We analysed 671 consecutively published case reports of a peer-reviewed medical journal for case reports. The general use of radiological imaging as well as the specific imaging modality used in each case (ultrasound, x-ray, fluoroscopy, CT, MRI) was documented, and most importantly the ‘final problem solver’, i.e. the diagnostic modality giving the final clue to the patient's diagnosis, was identified.

Results

In 511 of 671 (76.1 %) analysed case reports at least one radiological modality was used in the diagnostic cascade. In 28.6 % of all cases the final diagnosis was achieved by radiological imaging. All other cases were solved by the patient's history and physical examination (15.2 %), histology (12.4 %), and blood analysis (9.6 %). When radiology was the ‘final problem solver’, it was mainly CT (51.6 %) and MRI (30.6 %). In 52.2 % of the case reports the radiological image was included in the article.

Conclusion

In case reports published in a prominent general medical journal radiological imaging is an important key player in the diagnostic process. In many cases, it is also the diagnostic tool which ultimately leads to determining the final diagnosis.

Key Points

Radiology was the most important specialty for finding the final diagnosis.
CT was the most successful problem-solving imaging modality followed by MRI.
MRI and CT had the best solution rates of more than 30 %.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rosen MP et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396CrossRefPubMed Rosen MP et al (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Stromberg C, Johansson G, Adolfsson A (2007) Acute abdominal pain: diagnostic impact of immediate CT scanning. World J Surg 31:2347–2354, discussion 2355-8CrossRefPubMed Stromberg C, Johansson G, Adolfsson A (2007) Acute abdominal pain: diagnostic impact of immediate CT scanning. World J Surg 31:2347–2354, discussion 2355-8CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R et al (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 307:2400–2409CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R et al (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 307:2400–2409CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L (2010) Physician orders contribute to high-tech imaging slowdown. Health Aff (Millwood) 29:189–195CrossRef Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L (2010) Physician orders contribute to high-tech imaging slowdown. Health Aff (Millwood) 29:189–195CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Male RS et al (1983) Efficacy of computed tomography in the management of cancer patients. Cancer 52:1604–1608CrossRefPubMed Male RS et al (1983) Efficacy of computed tomography in the management of cancer patients. Cancer 52:1604–1608CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tsushima Y et al (2002) Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults. Clin Radiol 57:507–513CrossRefPubMed Tsushima Y et al (2002) Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults. Clin Radiol 57:507–513CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the contribution of radiological imaging to the final diagnosis in medical case reports
Authors
Isabel Wiesinger
Gregor Scharf
Natascha Platz
Lena M. Dendl
Michael T. Pawlik
Christian Stroszczynski
Andreas G. Schreyer
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3537-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

European Radiology 5/2015 Go to the issue