Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Chest

Pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules: Is measuring solid component size a better prognostic indicator?

Authors: Eui Jin Hwang, Chang Min Park, Youngjin Ryu, Sang Min Lee, Young Tae Kim, Young Whan Kim, Jin Mo Goo

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether measuring the solid portion of adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules (GGNs) can predict a patient’s prognosis accurately and how the prognosis corresponds to that of solid nodules.

Methods

501 patients (solid nodule group, 304; part-solid GGN group, 197) underwent curative surgery for stage I adenocarcinomas. Maximal diameters of the whole lesion including ground-glass opacities (D whole ) and solid components only (D solid ) were measured on CT. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of surgery.

Results

D solid was a significant prognostic factor in the part-solid GGN group, while D whole was not. Part-solid GGNs with D solid ≤2 cm showed significantly better DFS (P = 0.016) and OS (P = 0.004) than solid nodules; however, those with D solid >2 cm did not show a significant difference. Hazard ratio (HR) for increase in D solid was significantly greater in part-solid GGNs than in solid nodules (P = 0.009). For OS, HR for increase in D solid was greater in part-solid GGNs than in solid nodule, which was marginally not significant (P = 0.060).

Conclusion

D solid was better than D whole for prognosis prediction of adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid GGNs. In addition, the influence of D solid on prognosis in the part-solid GGN group was greater than in the solid nodule group.

Key points

• Dsolid is a better prognosis indicator than Dsolid in part-solid GGN adenocarcinomas
Part-solid GGN adenocarcinoma show better prognosis than solid adenocarcinomas when Dsolid ≤2 cm
• Dsolid has greater prognostic influence in part-solid GGN adenocarcinomas than solid adenocarcinomas
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference de Groot P, Munden RF (2012) Lung cancer epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention. Radiol Clin North Am 50:863–876PubMedCrossRef de Groot P, Munden RF (2012) Lung cancer epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention. Radiol Clin North Am 50:863–876PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG et al (2001) Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Radiol 84:25–32 Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG et al (2001) Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Radiol 84:25–32
4.
go back to reference Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H et al (2001) Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology 220:803–809PubMedCrossRef Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H et al (2001) Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology 220:803–809PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Godoy MC, Naidich DP (2009) Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended im guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 253:606–622PubMedCrossRef Godoy MC, Naidich DP (2009) Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended im guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 253:606–622PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R et al (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057PubMedCrossRef Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R et al (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Austin JH, Garg K, Aberle D et al (2013) Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Radiology 266:62–71PubMedCrossRef Austin JH, Garg K, Aberle D et al (2013) Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Radiology 266:62–71PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) national association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society national multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285PubMedCrossRef Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) national association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society national multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Saito H, Kameda Y, Masui K et al (2011) Correlations between thin-section CT findings, histopathological and clinical findings of small pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer 71:137–143PubMedCrossRef Saito H, Kameda Y, Masui K et al (2011) Correlations between thin-section CT findings, histopathological and clinical findings of small pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer 71:137–143PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ (2011) Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:533–543PubMedCrossRef Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ (2011) Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:533–543PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Lee CH, Chun EJ, Im JG (2007) Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics 27:391–408PubMedCrossRef Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Lee CH, Chun EJ, Im JG (2007) Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics 27:391–408PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim H, Park CM, Koh JM, Lee SM, Goo JM (2013) Pulmonary subsolid nodules: what radiologists need to know about the imaging features and management strategy. Diagn v Radiol 20:47–57 Kim H, Park CM, Koh JM, Lee SM, Goo JM (2013) Pulmonary subsolid nodules: what radiologists need to know about the imaging features and management strategy. Diagn v Radiol 20:47–57
13.
go back to reference Rami-Porta R, Ball D, Crowley J et al (2007) The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:593–602PubMedCrossRef Rami-Porta R, Ball D, Crowley J et al (2007) The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:593–602PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Edge SB, American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge SB, American Joint Committee on Cancer (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
15.
go back to reference Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Mimae T et al (2013) The prognostic role of pathologic invasive component size, excluding lepidic growth, in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:580–585PubMedCrossRef Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Mimae T et al (2013) The prognostic role of pathologic invasive component size, excluding lepidic growth, in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:580–585PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Borczuk AC, Qian F, Kazeros A et al (2009) Invasive size is an independent predictor of survival in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 33:462–469PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Borczuk AC, Qian F, Kazeros A et al (2009) Invasive size is an independent predictor of survival in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 33:462–469PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H et al (2012) Prognostic significance of using solid versus whole tumor size on high-resolution computed tomography for predicting pathologic malignant grade of tumors in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:607–612PubMedCrossRef Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H et al (2012) Prognostic significance of using solid versus whole tumor size on high-resolution computed tomography for predicting pathologic malignant grade of tumors in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:607–612PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sakao Y, Nakazono T, Tomimitsu S et al (2004) Lung adenocarcinoma can be subtyped according to tumor dimension by computed tomography mediastinal-window setting. Additional size criteria for clinical T1 adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:1211–1215PubMedCrossRef Sakao Y, Nakazono T, Tomimitsu S et al (2004) Lung adenocarcinoma can be subtyped according to tumor dimension by computed tomography mediastinal-window setting. Additional size criteria for clinical T1 adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:1211–1215PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722PubMedCrossRef Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Hess KR (1994) Assessing time-by-covariate actions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions. Stat Med 13:1045–1062PubMedCrossRef Hess KR (1994) Assessing time-by-covariate actions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions. Stat Med 13:1045–1062PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Heinzl H, Kaider A (1997) Gaining more flexibility in Cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 54:201–208PubMedCrossRef Heinzl H, Kaider A (1997) Gaining more flexibility in Cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 54:201–208PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lee SM, Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Wi JY, Kang CH (2013) Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas versus preinvasive lesions appearing as ground-glass nodules: differentiation by using CT features. Radiology 268:265–273PubMedCrossRef Lee SM, Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Wi JY, Kang CH (2013) Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas versus preinvasive lesions appearing as ground-glass nodules: differentiation by using CT features. Radiology 268:265–273PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yanagawa N, Shiono S, Abiko M, Ogata SY, Sato T, Tamura G (2013) New IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and invasive tumor size are predictive of disease recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 8:612–618PubMedCrossRef Yanagawa N, Shiono S, Abiko M, Ogata SY, Sato T, Tamura G (2013) New IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and invasive tumor size are predictive of disease recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 8:612–618PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ et al (2011) Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol 24:653–664PubMedCrossRef Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ et al (2011) Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol 24:653–664PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ikehara M, Saito H, Yamada K et al (2008) Prognosis of small adenocarcinoma of the lung based on thin-section computed tomography and pathological preparations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:426–431PubMedCrossRef Ikehara M, Saito H, Yamada K et al (2008) Prognosis of small adenocarcinoma of the lung based on thin-section computed tomography and pathological preparations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:426–431PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T et al (2011) A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol 6:751–756PubMedCrossRef Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T et al (2011) A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol 6:751–756PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Matsuguma H, Oki I, Nakahara R et al (2013) Comparison of three measurements on computed tomography for the prediction of less invasiveness in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 95:1878–1884PubMedCrossRef Matsuguma H, Oki I, Nakahara R et al (2013) Comparison of three measurements on computed tomography for the prediction of less invasiveness in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 95:1878–1884PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ohde Y, Nagai K, Yoshida J et al (2003) The proportion of consolidation to ground-glass opacity on high resolution CT is a good predictor for distinguishing the population of non-invasive peripheral adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 42:303–310PubMedCrossRef Ohde Y, Nagai K, Yoshida J et al (2003) The proportion of consolidation to ground-glass opacity on high resolution CT is a good predictor for distinguishing the population of non-invasive peripheral adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 42:303–310PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Yamanaka T et al (2013) Solid tumors versus mixed tumors with a ground-glass opacity component in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: Prognostic comparison using high-resolution computed tomography findings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:17–23PubMedCrossRef Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Yamanaka T et al (2013) Solid tumors versus mixed tumors with a ground-glass opacity component in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: Prognostic comparison using high-resolution computed tomography findings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:17–23PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienyenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G (2004) Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodule reliable? Radiology 231:453–458PubMedCrossRef Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienyenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G (2004) Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodule reliable? Radiology 231:453–458PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kakimura R, Ashizawa K, Kuriyama K et al (2012) Measurement of focal groun glass opacity diameters on CT images: observer agreement in regard to identifying increaseases in the size of ground-glass opacities. Acad Radiol 19:389–394CrossRef Kakimura R, Ashizawa K, Kuriyama K et al (2012) Measurement of focal groun glass opacity diameters on CT images: observer agreement in regard to identifying increaseases in the size of ground-glass opacities. Acad Radiol 19:389–394CrossRef
33.
34.
go back to reference Kim H, Park CM, Woo S et al (2013) Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm. Radiology 269:585–593PubMedCrossRef Kim H, Park CM, Woo S et al (2013) Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm. Radiology 269:585–593PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules: Is measuring solid component size a better prognostic indicator?
Authors
Eui Jin Hwang
Chang Min Park
Youngjin Ryu
Sang Min Lee
Young Tae Kim
Young Whan Kim
Jin Mo Goo
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3441-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

European Radiology 2/2015 Go to the issue