Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Neuro

Albumin-binding MR blood pool contrast agent improves diagnostic performance in human brain tumour: comparison of two contrast agents for glioblastoma

Authors: Josep Puig, Gerard Blasco, Marco Essig, Josep Daunis-i-Estadella, Gemma Laguillo, Ana María Quiles, Sebastián Remollo, Karsten Bergmann, Carme Joly, Lluis Bernado, Javier Sánchez-González, Salvador Pedraza

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

We qualitatively and quantitatively compared MRI enhancement obtained with gadofosveset, an albumin-binding blood-pool contrast agent, and with gadobutrol, an extracellular contrast agent, in patients with glioblastoma.

Methods

Thirty-five patients (25 men; 64 ± 14 years) with histologically proven glioblastoma underwent MRI including pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted SE images acquired 5 min after gadobutrol (0.1 mmol/kg) and, 48 h later, images acquired with identical parameters 5 min and 3, 6, and 24 h after gadofosveset (0.03 mmol/kg). Lesion extent, delineation, internal morphology, multifocality, and global diagnostic preference were evaluated quantitatively for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and contrast enhancement (CE).

Results

Mean values of SNR, CNR, and tumour CE were highest 6 h after gadofosveset. Multifocality was seen in 17 (48.6 %) patients; additional lesions had stronger enhancement 6 h after gadofosveset in 12 patients (70.6 %). In 21 (60 %) patients, radiologists’ global preference was highest in images acquired 6 h after gadofosveset (kappa = 0.764). In 22 patients (62.8 %), all qualitative endpoints were better at 5 min after gadobutrol than in images acquired 5 min after gadofosveset injection.

Conclusions

Gadobutrol gives significant tumour enhancement in early postcontrast imaging. However, images acquired 6 h after gadofosveset injection have significantly better diagnostic information endpoints and contrast enhancement.

Key Points

We compared MRI enhancement with gadofosveset and gadobutrol in patients with glioblastoma.
Gadobutrol provides better enhancement in early enhanced imaging at 5 min.
Gadofosveset at 6 h post-injection provides optimal enhancement and diagnostic information endpoints.
Gadofosveset is feasible for diagnostic quality contrast-enhanced MRI in glioblastoma.
The contrast medium dose can be reduced without disminishing the image quality using gadofosveset.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giesel FL, Mehndiratta A, Essig M (2010) High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review. Eur Radiol 20:2461–2474PubMedCrossRef Giesel FL, Mehndiratta A, Essig M (2010) High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review. Eur Radiol 20:2461–2474PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smirniotopoulos JG, Murphy FM, Rushing EJ, Rees JH, Schroeder JW (2007) Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges. Radiographics 27:525–551PubMedCrossRef Smirniotopoulos JG, Murphy FM, Rushing EJ, Rees JH, Schroeder JW (2007) Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges. Radiographics 27:525–551PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jensen TR, Schmainda KM (2009) Computer-aided detection of brain tumor invasion using multiparametric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:481–489PubMedCrossRef Jensen TR, Schmainda KM (2009) Computer-aided detection of brain tumor invasion using multiparametric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:481–489PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Essig M, Weber MA, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Knopp MV, Yuh WT, Giesel FL (2006) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system tumors: agents, mechanisms, and applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17:89–106PubMedCrossRef Essig M, Weber MA, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Knopp MV, Yuh WT, Giesel FL (2006) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system tumors: agents, mechanisms, and applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging 17:89–106PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Colosimo C, Manfredi R, Tartaglione T (1997) Contrast enhancement issues in the MR evaluation of the central nervous system. Eur Radiol Suppl 5:231–237 Colosimo C, Manfredi R, Tartaglione T (1997) Contrast enhancement issues in the MR evaluation of the central nervous system. Eur Radiol Suppl 5:231–237
6.
go back to reference Tombach B, Heindel W (2002) Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 12:1550–1556PubMedCrossRef Tombach B, Heindel W (2002) Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 12:1550–1556PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Jackson CB et al (2009) Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Investig Radiol 44:251–256CrossRef Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Jackson CB et al (2009) Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Investig Radiol 44:251–256CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mohs AM, Lu ZR (2007) Gadolinium (III)-based blood-pool contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: status and clinical potential. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 4:149–164PubMedCrossRef Mohs AM, Lu ZR (2007) Gadolinium (III)-based blood-pool contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: status and clinical potential. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 4:149–164PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Farooki A, Narra V, Brown J (2004) Gadofosveset EPIX/Schering. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 5:967–976PubMed Farooki A, Narra V, Brown J (2004) Gadofosveset EPIX/Schering. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 5:967–976PubMed
10.
go back to reference Caravan P (2009) Protein-targeted gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents: design and mechanism of action. Acc Chem Res 42:851–862PubMedCrossRef Caravan P (2009) Protein-targeted gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents: design and mechanism of action. Acc Chem Res 42:851–862PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Seitz RJ, Wechsler W (1987) Immunohistochemical demonstration of serum proteins in human cerebral gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 73:145–152PubMedCrossRef Seitz RJ, Wechsler W (1987) Immunohistochemical demonstration of serum proteins in human cerebral gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 73:145–152PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Essig M, Rohrer M, Giesel F et al (2010) Human brain tumor imaging with a protein-binding MR contrast agent: initial experience. Eur Radiol 20:218–226PubMedCrossRef Essig M, Rohrer M, Giesel F et al (2010) Human brain tumor imaging with a protein-binding MR contrast agent: initial experience. Eur Radiol 20:218–226PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maravilla KR, Maldjian JA, Schmalfuss IM et al (2006) Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology 240:389–400PubMedCrossRef Maravilla KR, Maldjian JA, Schmalfuss IM et al (2006) Contrast enhancement of central nervous system lesions: multicenter intraindividual crossover comparative study of two MR contrast agents. Radiology 240:389–400PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
15.
go back to reference Adzamli K, Yablonskiy DA, Chicoine MR et al (2003) Albumin-binding MR blood pool agents as MRI contrast agents in an intracranial mouse glioma model. Magn Reson Med 49:586–590PubMedCrossRef Adzamli K, Yablonskiy DA, Chicoine MR et al (2003) Albumin-binding MR blood pool agents as MRI contrast agents in an intracranial mouse glioma model. Magn Reson Med 49:586–590PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wintersperger BJ, Runge VM, Tweedle MF, Jackson CB, Reiser MF (2009) Brain tumor enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging: dependency on the level of protein binding of applied contrast agents. Investig Radiol 44:89–94CrossRef Wintersperger BJ, Runge VM, Tweedle MF, Jackson CB, Reiser MF (2009) Brain tumor enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging: dependency on the level of protein binding of applied contrast agents. Investig Radiol 44:89–94CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Els T, Bockhorst K, Hoehn-Berlage M (1993) NMR contrast enhancement of brain tumours: Comparison of the BBB tracer GdDTPA and tumour-selective contrast agent MnTPPS. MAGMA 1:126–133CrossRef Els T, Bockhorst K, Hoehn-Berlage M (1993) NMR contrast enhancement of brain tumours: Comparison of the BBB tracer GdDTPA and tumour-selective contrast agent MnTPPS. MAGMA 1:126–133CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hahn G, Sorge I, Gruhn B et al (2009) Pharmacokinetics and safety of gadobutrol enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Investig Radiol 44:776–783CrossRef Hahn G, Sorge I, Gruhn B et al (2009) Pharmacokinetics and safety of gadobutrol enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Investig Radiol 44:776–783CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V (2011) Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12:997–1003PubMedCrossRef Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V (2011) Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12:997–1003PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yuh WT, Tali ET, Nguyen HD, Simonson TM, Mayr NA, Fisher DJ (1995) The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:373–380PubMed Yuh WT, Tali ET, Nguyen HD, Simonson TM, Mayr NA, Fisher DJ (1995) The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:373–380PubMed
Metadata
Title
Albumin-binding MR blood pool contrast agent improves diagnostic performance in human brain tumour: comparison of two contrast agents for glioblastoma
Authors
Josep Puig
Gerard Blasco
Marco Essig
Josep Daunis-i-Estadella
Gemma Laguillo
Ana María Quiles
Sebastián Remollo
Karsten Bergmann
Carme Joly
Lluis Bernado
Javier Sánchez-González
Salvador Pedraza
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2678-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

European Radiology 4/2013 Go to the issue