Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 6/2012

01-06-2012 | Interventional

A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria

Authors: R. Zotova, J. Vassileva, J. Hristova, M. Pirinen, H. Järvinen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

A national study on patient dose values in interventional radiology and cardiology was performed in order to assess current practice in Bulgaria, to estimate the typical patient doses and to propose reference levels for the most common procedures.

Methods

Fifteen units and more than 1,000 cases were included. Average values of the measured parameters for three procedures—coronary angiography (CA), combined procedure (CA + PCI) and lower limb arteriography (LLA)—were compared with data published in the literature.

Results

Substantial variations were observed in equipment and procedure protocols used. This resulted in variations in patient dose: air-kerma area product ranges were 4–339, 6–1,003 and 0.2–288 Gy cm2 for CA, CA + PCI and LLA respectively. Reference levels for air kerma-area product were proposed: 40 Gy cm2 for CA, 140 Gy cm2 for CA + PCI and 45 Gy cm2 for LLA. Auxiliary reference intervals were proposed for other dose-related parameters: fluoroscopy time, number of images and entrance surface air kerma rate in fluoroscopy and cine mode.

Conclusions

There is an apparent necessity for improvement in the classification of peripheral procedures and for standardisation of the protocols applied. It is important that patient doses are routinely recorded and compared with reference levels.

Key Points

• Patient doses in interventional radiology are high and vary greatly
• Better standardisation of procedures and techniques is needed to improve practice
• Dose reference levels for most common procedures are proposed
Literature
1.
World Health Organisation (2000) Efficacy and radiation safety in interventional radiology. WHO, Geneva
2.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85. Annals of the ICRP. 30(2). Pergamon Press, Oxford
3.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2007) Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code of practice. Technical Reports Series No. 457. IAEA, Vienna
4.
ICRU (2005) Patient dosimetry for X-rays used in medical imaging. Report 74. J ICRU 5(2)
5.
International Electrotechnical Commission (2000) Medical electrical equipment—dose area product meters, 2nd edn, 2000–01. Publication 60580. IEC, Geneva
6.
National Radiation Protection Board (1992) National protocol for patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. NRPB, Chilton
7.
International Organisation for Standardisation (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva
8.
International Electrotechnical Commission (2008) Medical electrical equipment. General requirements for safety. Collateral standard. General requirements for radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment. Publication 60601-1-3. IEC, Englewood
9.
Trianni A, Gasparini D, Padovani R (2009) Trigger levels to prevent tissue reaction in interventional radiology procedures. IFMBE Proceedings 25:410–413CrossRef
10.
Žontar D, Kuhelj D, Škrk D, Zdešar U (2010) Patient peak skin doses from cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:262–265PubMedCrossRef
11.
Vano E, Jarvinen H, Kosunen A et al (2008) Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:39–45PubMedCrossRef
12.
Padovani R, Vano E, Trianni A et al (2008) Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:104–107PubMedCrossRef
13.
Hart D, Hillier M, Wall B (2007) Doses to patients from radiographic and fluoroscopic x-ray imaging procedures in the UK—2005 review. HPA-RPD-029. Health Protection Agency, Porton Down
14.
Holm L-E, Leitz W (2002) Regulations and general advice on diagnostic standard doses and reference levels within medical X-ray diagnostics. SSI FS 2002:2. Swedish Radiation Protection Authority, Stockholm
15.
Balter S, Miller D, Vano E et al (2008) A pilot study exploring the possibility of establishing guidance levels in X-ray directed interventional procedures. Med Phys 35:673–680PubMedCrossRef
16.
D’Helft C, McGee A, Rainford L et al (2008) Proposed preliminary diagnostic reference levels for three common interventional cardiology procedures in Ireland. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:63–66PubMedCrossRef
17.
Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer J-C et al (2007) How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at national level. Eur Radiol 17:1621–1633PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ruiz Cruces R, Garcia-Granados J, Diaz Romero FJ, Hernandez Armas J (1998) Estimation of effective dose in some digital angiographic and interventional procedures. Br J Radiol 71:42–47PubMed
19.
Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Guibelalde E (1995) Patient dose values in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol 68:1215–1220PubMedCrossRef
20.
Neofotistou V, Vano E, Padovani R et al (2003) Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol 13:2259–2263PubMedCrossRef
21.
Veit R, Bauer B (2003) Introduction of diagnostic reference levels into diagnostic radiology in Germany. Internal Report. Federal Office for Radiological Protection. Salzgitter
22.
Bleeser F, Hoornaert MT, Smans K et al (2008) Diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional radiology: a Belgian multi-centre study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:50–55PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria
Authors
R. Zotova
J. Vassileva
J. Hristova
M. Pirinen
H. Järvinen
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2386-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

European Radiology 6/2012 Go to the issue

Cardiac

Coronary artery assessment by multidetector computed tomography in patients with prosthetic heart valves

Contrast Media

Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections?

Musculoskeletal

Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software

Gastrointestinal

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice

Gastrointestinal

Assessment of arterial hypervascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of contrast-enhanced US and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging

Cardiac

Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT