Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2009

01-03-2009 | Musculoskeletal

Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences

Authors: T. Meindl, S. Wirth, S. Weckbach, O. Dietrich, M. Reiser, S. O. Schoenberg

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

To compare an isotropic three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution T2-weighted (w) MR sequence and its reformations with conventional sequences for imaging of the cervical spine. Fifteen volunteers were examined at 1.5 T using sagittal and axial 3D T2-w, sagittal and axial 2D T2w, and axial 2D T2*w MR sequences. Axial reformations of the sagittal 3D dataset were generated (3D MPR T2w). Signal-to-noise and image homogeneity were evaluated in a phantom and in vivo. Visibility of ten anatomical structures of the cervical spine was evaluated. Artifacts were assessed. For statistical analysis, Cohen’s kappa, Wilcoxon matched pairs, and t-testing were utilized. There were no significant differences in homogeneity between the sequences. Sagittal 3D T2w enabled better delineation of nerve roots, neural foramina, and intraforaminal structures compared to sagittal 2D T2w. Axial 3D T2w and axial 3D MPR T2w resulted in superior visibility of most anatomical structures compared to axial 2D T2w and comparable results to 2D T2*w concerning the spinal cord, nerve roots, intraforaminal structures, and fat. Artifacts were most pronounced in axial 2D T2w and axial 3D T2w. Acquisition of a 3D T2w data set is feasible in the cervical spine with superior delineation of anatomical structures compared to 2D sequences.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boutin RD, Steinbach LS, Finnesey K (2000) MR imaging of degenerative diseases in the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:471–490PubMed Boutin RD, Steinbach LS, Finnesey K (2000) MR imaging of degenerative diseases in the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:471–490PubMed
2.
go back to reference Isoda H, Ramsey RG (1998) MR imaging of acute transverse myelitis (myelopathy). Radiat Med 16:179–186PubMed Isoda H, Ramsey RG (1998) MR imaging of acute transverse myelitis (myelopathy). Radiat Med 16:179–186PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ruiz A, Post MJ, Sklar EM et al (2000) MR imaging of infections of the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:561–580PubMed Ruiz A, Post MJ, Sklar EM et al (2000) MR imaging of infections of the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:561–580PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lee RR (2000) MR imaging of intradural tumors of the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:529–540PubMed Lee RR (2000) MR imaging of intradural tumors of the cervical spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:529–540PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sevick RJ, Wallace CJ (1999) MR imaging of neoplasms of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:539–553PubMed Sevick RJ, Wallace CJ (1999) MR imaging of neoplasms of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:539–553PubMed
6.
go back to reference Pattany PM, Saraf-Lavi E, Bowen BC (2003) MR angiography of the spine and spinal cord. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14:444–460CrossRefPubMed Pattany PM, Saraf-Lavi E, Bowen BC (2003) MR angiography of the spine and spinal cord. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14:444–460CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Katzberg RW, Benedetti PF, Drake CM et al (1999) Acute cervical spine injuries: prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. Radiology 213:203–212PubMed Katzberg RW, Benedetti PF, Drake CM et al (1999) Acute cervical spine injuries: prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. Radiology 213:203–212PubMed
8.
go back to reference Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K (1995) Trauma radiology: part V. Imaging of acute cervical spine trauma. J Intensive Care Med 10:15–33PubMed Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K (1995) Trauma radiology: part V. Imaging of acute cervical spine trauma. J Intensive Care Med 10:15–33PubMed
9.
go back to reference Melhem ER (2000) Technical challenges in MR imaging of the cervical spine and cord. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:435–452PubMed Melhem ER (2000) Technical challenges in MR imaging of the cervical spine and cord. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:435–452PubMed
10.
go back to reference Runge VM, Wood ML, Kaufman DM et al (1988) The straight and narrow path to good head and spine MRI. Radiographics 8:507–531PubMed Runge VM, Wood ML, Kaufman DM et al (1988) The straight and narrow path to good head and spine MRI. Radiographics 8:507–531PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wolansky LJ, Parikh DD, Shah KJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for cervical disc disease: what is your neighbour up to? J Neuroimaging 15:183–187PubMed Wolansky LJ, Parikh DD, Shah KJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for cervical disc disease: what is your neighbour up to? J Neuroimaging 15:183–187PubMed
12.
go back to reference Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Glaser C, Dietrich O et al (2007) MR imaging of the cervical spine: assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements. Eur Radiol 17(5):1147–1155, Epub 2006 Oct 27CrossRefPubMed Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Glaser C, Dietrich O et al (2007) MR imaging of the cervical spine: assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements. Eur Radiol 17(5):1147–1155, Epub 2006 Oct 27CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ramli N, Cooper A, Jaspan T (2001) High resolution CISS imaging of the spine. Br J Radiol 74:862–873PubMed Ramli N, Cooper A, Jaspan T (2001) High resolution CISS imaging of the spine. Br J Radiol 74:862–873PubMed
14.
go back to reference Lichy MP, Wietek BM, Mugler JP et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 40:754–760CrossRefPubMed Lichy MP, Wietek BM, Mugler JP et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 40:754–760CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mugler JP, Bao S, Mulkern RV et al (2000) Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 216:891–899PubMed Mugler JP, Bao S, Mulkern RV et al (2000) Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 216:891–899PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB et al (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(2):375–385CrossRefPubMed Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB et al (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(2):375–385CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Li T, Mirowitz SA (2002) Comparative study of fast MR imaging: quantitative analysis on image quality and efficiency among various time frames and contrast behaviors. Magn Reson Imaging 20(6):471–478CrossRefPubMed Li T, Mirowitz SA (2002) Comparative study of fast MR imaging: quantitative analysis on image quality and efficiency among various time frames and contrast behaviors. Magn Reson Imaging 20(6):471–478CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wicks DA, Barker GJ, Tofts PS (1993) Correction of intensity nonuniformity in MR images of any orientation. Magn Reson Imaging 11(2):183–196CrossRefPubMed Wicks DA, Barker GJ, Tofts PS (1993) Correction of intensity nonuniformity in MR images of any orientation. Magn Reson Imaging 11(2):183–196CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Georgy BA, Hesselink JR (1994) MR imaging of the spine: recent advances in pulse sequences and special techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:923–934PubMed Georgy BA, Hesselink JR (1994) MR imaging of the spine: recent advances in pulse sequences and special techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:923–934PubMed
20.
go back to reference Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW et al (1988) Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:1149–1155PubMed Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW et al (1988) Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:1149–1155PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tsuruda JS, Remley K (1991) Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12:237–241PubMed Tsuruda JS, Remley K (1991) Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12:237–241PubMed
22.
go back to reference Freund M, Sartor K (2006) Degenerative spine disorders in the context of clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 58(1):15–26, Epub 2006 Jan 24CrossRefPubMed Freund M, Sartor K (2006) Degenerative spine disorders in the context of clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 58(1):15–26, Epub 2006 Jan 24CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hayes CW, Jensen ME, Conway WF (1989) Non-neoplastic lesions of vertebral bodies: findings in magnetic resonance imaging. Radiographics 9:883–903PubMed Hayes CW, Jensen ME, Conway WF (1989) Non-neoplastic lesions of vertebral bodies: findings in magnetic resonance imaging. Radiographics 9:883–903PubMed
24.
go back to reference Miller DH, Grossman RI, Reingold SC et al (1998) The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis. Brain 121(Pt 1):3–24CrossRefPubMed Miller DH, Grossman RI, Reingold SC et al (1998) The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis. Brain 121(Pt 1):3–24CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Aoki C et al (2003) Application of multi-detector row helical scanning to postmyelographic CT. Eur Radiol 13(6):1438–1443, Epub 2002 Nov 19PubMed Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Aoki C et al (2003) Application of multi-detector row helical scanning to postmyelographic CT. Eur Radiol 13(6):1438–1443, Epub 2002 Nov 19PubMed
26.
go back to reference Dorenbeck U, Schreyer AG, Schlaier J et al (2004) Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT. Neuroradiology 46(4):306–309, Epub 2004 Mar 19CrossRefPubMed Dorenbeck U, Schreyer AG, Schlaier J et al (2004) Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT. Neuroradiology 46(4):306–309, Epub 2004 Mar 19CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Held P, Seitz J, Frund R et al (2001) Comparison of two-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and two-dimensional turbo gradient spin echo sequences in MRI of the cervical spinal cord anatomy. Eur J Radiol 38(1):64–71CrossRefPubMed Held P, Seitz J, Frund R et al (2001) Comparison of two-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and two-dimensional turbo gradient spin echo sequences in MRI of the cervical spinal cord anatomy. Eur J Radiol 38(1):64–71CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences
Authors
T. Meindl
S. Wirth
S. Weckbach
O. Dietrich
M. Reiser
S. O. Schoenberg
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1175-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

European Radiology 3/2009 Go to the issue