Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2007

01-08-2007 | Gastrointestinal

Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT

Authors: O. Schaefer, M. Langer

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) all have the potential to directly visualize local and distant relapse of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nevertheless, the role of diagnostic imaging for routine follow-up of CRC patients remains controversial. Although MRI and PET have advantages over CT in the detection of local recurrence, until now only a few surveillance programs recommend the use of annual CT for routine follow-up. The objective of this review is to elucidate the current status of diagnostic imaging for the detection of recurrent rectal cancer based on the recent literature and our own experience. Furthermore, an insight into contemporary surveillance programs and an outlook concerning a novel technical approach to moving-table MRI at 1.5 Tesla for staging purposes are given.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Jessup JM, Menk HR, Fremgen A et al (1997) Diagnosing colorectal carcinoma: clinical and molecular approaches. CA Cancer J Clin 47:70–92PubMed Jessup JM, Menk HR, Fremgen A et al (1997) Diagnosing colorectal carcinoma: clinical and molecular approaches. CA Cancer J Clin 47:70–92PubMed
3.
go back to reference Arriola E, Navarro M, Pares D et al (2006) Imaging techniques contribute to increased surgical rescue of relapse in the follow-up of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:478–484PubMedCrossRef Arriola E, Navarro M, Pares D et al (2006) Imaging techniques contribute to increased surgical rescue of relapse in the follow-up of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:478–484PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Abir F, Alva S, Longo WE et al (2006) The postoperative surveillance of patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer. Am J Surg 192:100–108PubMedCrossRef Abir F, Alva S, Longo WE et al (2006) The postoperative surveillance of patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer. Am J Surg 192:100–108PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Desch CE, Benson AB, Somerfield MR et al (2005) Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 23:8512–8519PubMedCrossRef Desch CE, Benson AB, Somerfield MR et al (2005) Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 23:8512–8519PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kievit J (2002) Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: numbers needed to test and treat. Eur J Cancer 38:986–999PubMedCrossRef Kievit J (2002) Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: numbers needed to test and treat. Eur J Cancer 38:986–999PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81:7–19PubMedCrossRef Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81:7–19PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Titu LV, Nicholson AA, Hartley JE et al (2006) Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 243:348–352PubMedCrossRef Titu LV, Nicholson AA, Hartley JE et al (2006) Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 243:348–352PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller AR (1998) Multidisciplinary management of recurrent colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 7:209–221PubMedCrossRef Miller AR (1998) Multidisciplinary management of recurrent colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 7:209–221PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on the quality of life. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:349–353PubMedCrossRef Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on the quality of life. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:349–353PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goldberg RM, Fleming TR, Tangen CM et al (1998) Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, the North Central Cancer Treatment Group , and the Southwest Oncology Group. Ann Intern Med 129:27–35PubMed Goldberg RM, Fleming TR, Tangen CM et al (1998) Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, the North Central Cancer Treatment Group , and the Southwest Oncology Group. Ann Intern Med 129:27–35PubMed
12.
go back to reference Huguier M, Houry S, Barrier A (2001) Local recurrence of cancer of the rectum. Am J Surg 182:437–439PubMedCrossRef Huguier M, Houry S, Barrier A (2001) Local recurrence of cancer of the rectum. Am J Surg 182:437–439PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Cohen AM et al (2005) Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg 241:829–838PubMedCrossRef Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Cohen AM et al (2005) Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg 241:829–838PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Longo WE, Johnson FE (2002) The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82:1091–1108PubMedCrossRef Longo WE, Johnson FE (2002) The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82:1091–1108PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Giordano P, Efron J, Vernava AM et al (2006) Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 10:199–207PubMedCrossRef Giordano P, Efron J, Vernava AM et al (2006) Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 10:199–207PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R et al (1998) Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1127–1133PubMedCrossRef Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R et al (1998) Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1127–1133PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D et al (2002) Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. J Surg Oncol 28:418–423CrossRef Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D et al (2002) Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. J Surg Oncol 28:418–423CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Makela JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI (1995) Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 130:1062–1067PubMed Makela JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI (1995) Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 130:1062–1067PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H et al (1995) Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 38:619–626PubMedCrossRef Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H et al (1995) Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 38:619–626PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C et al (1997) A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 84:666–669PubMedCrossRef Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C et al (1997) A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 84:666–669PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L et al (1998) Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 114:7–14PubMedCrossRef Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L et al (1998) Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 114:7–14PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J et al (2003) Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer 3:26PubMedCrossRef Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J et al (2003) Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer 3:26PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324:1–8CrossRef Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324:1–8CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P (2002) Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Library (CD002200), Oxford Jeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P (2002) Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Library (CD002200), Oxford
25.
go back to reference Chau I, Allen MJ, Cunningham D et al (2004) The value of routine serum carcino-embryonic antigen measurement and computed tomography in the surveillance of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1420–1429PubMedCrossRef Chau I, Allen MJ, Cunningham D et al (2004) The value of routine serum carcino-embryonic antigen measurement and computed tomography in the surveillance of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1420–1429PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cutait R, Alves VA, Lopes LC et al (1991) Restaging of colorectal cancer based on the identification of lymph node micrometastases through immunoperoxidase staining of CEA and cytokeratins. Dis Colon Rectum 34:917–920PubMedCrossRef Cutait R, Alves VA, Lopes LC et al (1991) Restaging of colorectal cancer based on the identification of lymph node micrometastases through immunoperoxidase staining of CEA and cytokeratins. Dis Colon Rectum 34:917–920PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Carl J, Bentzen SM, Norgaard-Pedersen B et al (1993) Modelling of serial carcinoembryonic antigen changes in colorectal cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 53:751–755PubMed Carl J, Bentzen SM, Norgaard-Pedersen B et al (1993) Modelling of serial carcinoembryonic antigen changes in colorectal cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 53:751–755PubMed
28.
go back to reference ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of colon cancer. Ann Oncol 16:16–17CrossRef ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of colon cancer. Ann Oncol 16:16–17CrossRef
29.
go back to reference ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16:18–19CrossRef ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16:18–19CrossRef
30.
go back to reference ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16:20–21CrossRef ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16:20–21CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bleeker WA, Mulder NH, Hermans J et al (2001) Value and cost of follow-up after adjuvant treatment of patients with Dukes’ C colonic cancer. Br J Surg 88:101–106PubMedCrossRef Bleeker WA, Mulder NH, Hermans J et al (2001) Value and cost of follow-up after adjuvant treatment of patients with Dukes’ C colonic cancer. Br J Surg 88:101–106PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tepper JE, O’Connell M, Niedzwiecki D et al (2002) Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control-final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol 20:1744–1750PubMedCrossRef Tepper JE, O’Connell M, Niedzwiecki D et al (2002) Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control-final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol 20:1744–1750PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
go back to reference Stueckle CA, Haegele KF, Jendreck M et al (2005) Improvements in detection of rectal cancer recurrence by multiplanar reconstruction. Radiologe 45:930–935CrossRef Stueckle CA, Haegele KF, Jendreck M et al (2005) Improvements in detection of rectal cancer recurrence by multiplanar reconstruction. Radiologe 45:930–935CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Stueckle CA, Adams S, Stueckle KF et al (2006) Multi-detector CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrence of rectal cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5:285–289PubMed Stueckle CA, Adams S, Stueckle KF et al (2006) Multi-detector CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrence of rectal cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5:285–289PubMed
36.
go back to reference Blomqvist L, Holm T, Goranson H et al (1996) MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Acta Radiol 37:779–784PubMedCrossRef Blomqvist L, Holm T, Goranson H et al (1996) MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Acta Radiol 37:779–784PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Pema PJ, Bennett WF, Bova JG et al (1994) CT vs MRI in diagnosis of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. J Comp Assist Tomogr 18:256–261CrossRef Pema PJ, Bennett WF, Bova JG et al (1994) CT vs MRI in diagnosis of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. J Comp Assist Tomogr 18:256–261CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Castells A, Bessa X, Daniels M et al (1998) Value of postoperative surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 41:714–724PubMedCrossRef Castells A, Bessa X, Daniels M et al (1998) Value of postoperative surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 41:714–724PubMedCrossRef
39.
40.
41.
go back to reference Markus J, Morrissey B, deGara C et al (1997) MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22:338–342PubMedCrossRef Markus J, Morrissey B, deGara C et al (1997) MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22:338–342PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Torricelli P, Pecchi A, Luppi G et al (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:19–27PubMedCrossRef Torricelli P, Pecchi A, Luppi G et al (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:19–27PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Dicle O, Obuz F, Cakmakci H (1999) Differentiation of recurrent rectal cancer and scarring with dynamic MR imaging. Br J Radiol 72:1155–1159PubMed Dicle O, Obuz F, Cakmakci H (1999) Differentiation of recurrent rectal cancer and scarring with dynamic MR imaging. Br J Radiol 72:1155–1159PubMed
44.
go back to reference Akhurst T, Larson SM (1999) Positron emission tomography imaging of colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 26:577–583PubMed Akhurst T, Larson SM (1999) Positron emission tomography imaging of colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 26:577–583PubMed
45.
go back to reference Fukunaga H, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M et al (2004) Fusion image of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12:1–9 Fukunaga H, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M et al (2004) Fusion image of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12:1–9
46.
go back to reference Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE et al (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–1189PubMed Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE et al (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–1189PubMed
47.
go back to reference Gearhart SL, Frassica D, Rosen R et al (2005) Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13:397–404CrossRef Gearhart SL, Frassica D, Rosen R et al (2005) Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13:397–404CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Moore HG, Akhurst T, Larson SM et al (2003) A case-controlled study of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of pelvic recurrence in previously irradiated rectal cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 197:22–28PubMedCrossRef Moore HG, Akhurst T, Larson SM et al (2003) A case-controlled study of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of pelvic recurrence in previously irradiated rectal cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 197:22–28PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H et al (2004) Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology 232:815–822PubMedCrossRef Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H et al (2004) Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology 232:815–822PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF (2006) Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology 238:405–422CrossRef von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF (2006) Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology 238:405–422CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Kamel IR, Cohade C, Neyman E et al (2004) Incremental value of CT in PET/CT of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:663–668PubMedCrossRef Kamel IR, Cohade C, Neyman E et al (2004) Incremental value of CT in PET/CT of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:663–668PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Bhattacharjya S, Bhattacharjya T, Baber S et al (2004) Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of colorectal liver metastases for liver resection. Br J Surg 91:1361–1369PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharjya S, Bhattacharjya T, Baber S et al (2004) Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of colorectal liver metastases for liver resection. Br J Surg 91:1361–1369PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M et al (2002) Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224:748–756PubMedCrossRef Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M et al (2002) Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224:748–756PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EFI et al (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EFI et al (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Herzog P et al (2005) High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system. Invest Radiol 40:743–753PubMedCrossRef Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Herzog P et al (2005) High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system. Invest Radiol 40:743–753PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference MERCURY Study Group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ, DOI 10.1136/bmj.3897.646400.55 MERCURY Study Group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ, DOI 10.​1136/​bmj.​3897.​646400.​55
57.
go back to reference Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJM et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging-a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773–783PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJM et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging-a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773–783PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2006) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:379–389PubMedCrossRef Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2006) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:379–389PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Brown G (2005) Thin section MRI in multidisciplinary pre-operative descision making for patients with rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 78:117–127CrossRef Brown G (2005) Thin section MRI in multidisciplinary pre-operative descision making for patients with rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 78:117–127CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Kim CK, Kim SH, Chun HK et al (2006) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16:972–980PubMedCrossRef Kim CK, Kim SH, Chun HK et al (2006) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16:972–980PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Torkzad MR, Hansson KA, Lindholm J et al (2006) Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print] Torkzad MR, Hansson KA, Lindholm J et al (2006) Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print]
62.
go back to reference Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2005) The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15:1184–1191PubMedCrossRef Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2005) The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15:1184–1191PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Fautz H-P, Kannengiesser SAR (2006) Sliding multislice (SMS): a new technique for minimum FOV usage in axial continously moving-table acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 55:363–370PubMedCrossRef Fautz H-P, Kannengiesser SAR (2006) Sliding multislice (SMS): a new technique for minimum FOV usage in axial continously moving-table acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 55:363–370PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Ludwig U, Sommer G, Zaitsev M et al (2006) 2D axial moving table acquisitions with dynamic slice adaption. Magn Reson Med 55:423–430PubMedCrossRef Ludwig U, Sommer G, Zaitsev M et al (2006) 2D axial moving table acquisitions with dynamic slice adaption. Magn Reson Med 55:423–430PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Sommer G, Fautz H-P, Ludwig U et al (2006) Multicontrast sequences with continuous table motion: a novel acquisition technique for extended field of view imaging. Magn Reson Med 55:918–922PubMedCrossRef Sommer G, Fautz H-P, Ludwig U et al (2006) Multicontrast sequences with continuous table motion: a novel acquisition technique for extended field of view imaging. Magn Reson Med 55:918–922PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Chassin MR, Galwin RW (1998) The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health care Quality. JAMA 280:1000–1005PubMedCrossRef Chassin MR, Galwin RW (1998) The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health care Quality. JAMA 280:1000–1005PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT
Authors
O. Schaefer
M. Langer
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0613-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

European Radiology 8/2007 Go to the issue