Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2007

01-03-2007 | Magnetic Resonance

The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography

Authors: Johannes T. Heverhagen, Isabelle Reitz, Martina Pavlicova, Andrea L. Levine, Klaus J. Klose, Hans-Joachim Wagner

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

To show the effects of different concentrations of contrast agent on signal time curves and image contrast of abdominal aorta, vena cava and portal vein in comparison to each other as well as liver and spleen. Imaging was carried out in a 1.0 Tesla clinical scanner. Sixty patients were prospectively included and divided into three contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) dosage groups (0.1 mmol/kg, 0.2 mmol/kg and 0.3 mmol/kg). All patients were scanned using a time-resolved 3D FLASH sequence (58 phases) with a 3.75 second acquisition time per phase. Signal time curves and image contrast levels were evaluated. No significant differences were found for the maximum signal enhancement between the groups in the investigated vessels. Image masking, the subtraction of the baseline images, resulted in a substantial improvement in image contrast. However, statistically significant differences between the contrast agent dosage groups could only be found for vena cava and liver. Vessel conspicuity is not significantly improved with an increase of contrast agent dose. However, an increase in contrast agent dosage increases vessel contrast. Our findings suggest that a single dose single station investigation seems to be sufficient for high quality abdominal MRA.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC et al (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785–792PubMed Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC et al (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785–792PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rofsky NM, Adelman MA (2000) MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 214:325–338PubMed Rofsky NM, Adelman MA (2000) MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 214:325–338PubMed
4.
go back to reference Meaney JF, Prince MR (1999) Pulmonary MR angiography. Magn Reson.Imaging Clin N Am 7:393–409, xPubMed Meaney JF, Prince MR (1999) Pulmonary MR angiography. Magn Reson.Imaging Clin N Am 7:393–409, xPubMed
5.
go back to reference Foo TK, Ho VB, Choyke PL (1999) Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography. Imaging principles and physics. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 9:263–284PubMed Foo TK, Ho VB, Choyke PL (1999) Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography. Imaging principles and physics. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 9:263–284PubMed
6.
go back to reference Leiner T, de Haan MW, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 15:2219–2229PubMedCrossRef Leiner T, de Haan MW, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 15:2219–2229PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schmitt R, Coblenz G, Cherevatyy O et al (2005) Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries. Eur Radiol 15:2513–2524PubMedCrossRef Schmitt R, Coblenz G, Cherevatyy O et al (2005) Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries. Eur Radiol 15:2513–2524PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Korner M, Baumgartner I, Do DD et al (1999) PTA of the subclavian and innominate arteries: long-term results. Vasa 28:117–122PubMedCrossRef Korner M, Baumgartner I, Do DD et al (1999) PTA of the subclavian and innominate arteries: long-term results. Vasa 28:117–122PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sawlani V, Phadke RV, Baijal SS et al (1996) Arterial complications of pancreatitis and their radiological management. Australas Radiol 40:381–386PubMed Sawlani V, Phadke RV, Baijal SS et al (1996) Arterial complications of pancreatitis and their radiological management. Australas Radiol 40:381–386PubMed
10.
go back to reference Patel YD (1993) Vascular interventions in the abdomen: current status. Ann Acad Med Singapore 22:768–775PubMed Patel YD (1993) Vascular interventions in the abdomen: current status. Ann Acad Med Singapore 22:768–775PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dunnick NR, Sfakianakis GN (1991) Screening for renovascular hypertension. Radiol Clin North Am 29:497–510PubMed Dunnick NR, Sfakianakis GN (1991) Screening for renovascular hypertension. Radiol Clin North Am 29:497–510PubMed
12.
go back to reference Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, et al (1995) Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:431–437PubMed Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, et al (1995) Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:431–437PubMed
13.
go back to reference Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM et al (1996) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36:345–351PubMed Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM et al (1996) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36:345–351PubMed
14.
go back to reference Merlino B, Salcuni M, Salute L et al (2001) Total body MR angiography and atherosclerosis. Rays 26:305–314PubMed Merlino B, Salcuni M, Salute L et al (2001) Total body MR angiography and atherosclerosis. Rays 26:305–314PubMed
15.
go back to reference Saini S, Fretz CJ, Fisel CR et al (1991) In vitro evaluation of a mechanical injector for infusion of magnetic resonance contrast media. Invest Radiol 26:748–751PubMedCrossRef Saini S, Fretz CJ, Fisel CR et al (1991) In vitro evaluation of a mechanical injector for infusion of magnetic resonance contrast media. Invest Radiol 26:748–751PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Frayne R, Grist TM, Swan JS et al (2000) 3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:476–487PubMedCrossRef Frayne R, Grist TM, Swan JS et al (2000) 3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:476–487PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Miller RG (1981) Simultaneous statistical inference. 2nd edn, Springer Berlin Heidelberlg New York Miller RG (1981) Simultaneous statistical inference. 2nd edn, Springer Berlin Heidelberlg New York
18.
go back to reference Hommel G (1988) A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75:383–386CrossRef Hommel G (1988) A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75:383–386CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Svensson J, Petersson JS, Stahlberg F et al (1999) Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:919–928PubMedCrossRef Svensson J, Petersson JS, Stahlberg F et al (1999) Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:919–928PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR et al (1996) Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 201:705–710PubMed Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR et al (1996) Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 201:705–710PubMed
21.
go back to reference Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffler K et al (1998) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. Invest Radiol 33:538–546PubMedCrossRef Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffler K et al (1998) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. Invest Radiol 33:538–546PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography
Authors
Johannes T. Heverhagen
Isabelle Reitz
Martina Pavlicova
Andrea L. Levine
Klaus J. Klose
Hans-Joachim Wagner
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0419-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

European Radiology 3/2007 Go to the issue