Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2005

01-03-2005 | Neuro

Metastatic disease of the spine

Authors: Cosma Andreula, Mario Murrone

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Metastases of the spine occur in the spinal cord, dura extramedullary, epidural space, and vertebral bodies. Imaging modalities can be used to evaluate patient symptoms, screen and detect lesions, assess localization and the compartments involved (extradural, epidural, subdural, and paraspinal), and suggest therapeutic strategies. The suggested flow chart for metastases is (1) in asymptomatic patients suspected for metastases and (2) in the patient with neurological symptoms. Imaging modalities are indispensable in differential diagnosis because some nontumoral lesions can mimic metastases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schiff D, O’Neill BP, Suman VJ (1997) Spinal epidural metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignancy: clinical features and diagnostic approach. Neurology 49:452–456 Schiff D, O’Neill BP, Suman VJ (1997) Spinal epidural metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignancy: clinical features and diagnostic approach. Neurology 49:452–456
2.
go back to reference Layer G, Steudel A, Schuller H, van Kaick G, Grunwald F, Reiser M, Schild HH (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging to detect bone marrow metastases in the initial staging of small cell lung carcinoma and breast carcinoma. Cancer 85:1004–1009CrossRefPubMed Layer G, Steudel A, Schuller H, van Kaick G, Grunwald F, Reiser M, Schild HH (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging to detect bone marrow metastases in the initial staging of small cell lung carcinoma and breast carcinoma. Cancer 85:1004–1009CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Steinborn MM, Heuck AF, Tilling R et al (1999) Whole body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Cent Adv Telev Stud 23(1):123–129 Steinborn MM, Heuck AF, Tilling R et al (1999) Whole body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Cent Adv Telev Stud 23(1):123–129
4.
go back to reference Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V et al (1997) A comparison of whole body turbo STIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. Am J Roentgenol 169(6):1655–1661 Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V et al (1997) A comparison of whole body turbo STIR MR imaging and planar 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. Am J Roentgenol 169(6):1655–1661
5.
go back to reference Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM et al (2001) Whole body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236 Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM et al (2001) Whole body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236
6.
go back to reference Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Wohlfart K et al (2004) Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14(1):99–105CrossRefPubMed Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Wohlfart K et al (2004) Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14(1):99–105CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kavanagh E, Smith C, Eustace S (2003) Whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging: controversies and avenues for development. Eur Radiol 13(9):2196–2205CrossRefPubMed Kavanagh E, Smith C, Eustace S (2003) Whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging: controversies and avenues for development. Eur Radiol 13(9):2196–2205CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goyen M, Goehde SC, Herborn CU et al (2004) MR-based full-body preventative cardiovascular and tumor imaging: technique and preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 14(5):783–791PubMed Goyen M, Goehde SC, Herborn CU et al (2004) MR-based full-body preventative cardiovascular and tumor imaging: technique and preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 14(5):783–791PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mentzel HJ, Kentouche K, Sauner D et al (2004) Comparison of whole-body STIR-MRI and (99m) Tc-methylene-diphosphonate scintigraphy in children with suspected multifocal bone lesions. Eur Radiol 14(12):2297–2302. DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2390-5 Mentzel HJ, Kentouche K, Sauner D et al (2004) Comparison of whole-body STIR-MRI and (99m) Tc-methylene-diphosphonate scintigraphy in children with suspected multifocal bone lesions. Eur Radiol 14(12):2297–2302. DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2390-5
10.
go back to reference Kienstra GE, Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Cantal R, Bortslap AC, Tijssen JG (2000) Prediction of spina epidural metastases. Arch Neurol 57:690–695CrossRef Kienstra GE, Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Cantal R, Bortslap AC, Tijssen JG (2000) Prediction of spina epidural metastases. Arch Neurol 57:690–695CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vanel D, Bittoun J, Tardivon A (1998) MRI of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 8:1345–1351CrossRef Vanel D, Bittoun J, Tardivon A (1998) MRI of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 8:1345–1351CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yuh WTC, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ et al (1989) Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 172:215–218PubMed Yuh WTC, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ et al (1989) Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 172:215–218PubMed
13.
go back to reference Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R et al (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fracture. Radiology 207(2):349–356 Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R et al (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fracture. Radiology 207(2):349–356
14.
go back to reference Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL (2000) Diffusion weighted MR imaging offers non advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 21(5):948–953 Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL (2000) Diffusion weighted MR imaging offers non advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 21(5):948–953
15.
go back to reference Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. Am J Roentgenol 176(2):351–358PubMed Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Adam G et al (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation of benign fracture edema and tumor infiltration of the vertebral body. Am J Roentgenol 176(2):351–358PubMed
Metadata
Title
Metastatic disease of the spine
Authors
Cosma Andreula
Mario Murrone
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2627-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

European Radiology 3/2005 Go to the issue